Suppr超能文献

比较袖状胃切除术患者中超声引导和腹腔镜引导下的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞

Comparing Ultrasound- and Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Blocks in Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients.

作者信息

Baumgartner William C, Richards Fielding M, Arnsberger Brandon J, Sheets Deirdre, Powell John

机构信息

General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Community Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, USA.

General and Bariatric Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Community Osteopathic Hospital, Harrisburg, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 19;16(12):e76033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76033. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction Obesity is a major disease process in the United States with increasing prevalence and is associated with various comorbid conditions. Bariatric surgery, particularly laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), is an effective weight loss intervention but presents challenges in postoperative pain management. This study compares the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (UTAP) blocks, laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) blocks, and no regional anesthesia on overall opioid use and postoperative outcomes in LSG patients. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 1,239 obese patients who underwent LSG at a single hospital from January 2019 to June 2023. Patients were categorized into the following three groups: UTAP, LTAP, and no TAP. The primary outcome was the total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used within the first 24 h and 48 h, and the average amount of MME during the hospital stay (all reported in median interquartile ranges). Secondary outcomes included total anesthesia time, postoperative pain scores, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and emergency room visit rates. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multiple linear regression. Results The UTAP group had significantly lower median MME within the first 24 h (63 MME) compared to the LTAP group (98.8 MME, p<0.0001) and throughout the hospital stay (93 MME vs. 120 MME, p=0.0004). Both UTAP and LTAP groups had significantly lower total MME compared to the no TAP group (p<0.0001 for both). Total anesthesia time was longer for UTAP (98.5 min) compared to LTAP (92.5 min, p=0.0472). LOS was significantly longer in the UTAP group (1.59 days) compared to LTAP (1.18 days, p=0.0061). There were no significant differences in pain scores at various time points or in 30-day readmission and emergency room visit rates between the UTAP and LTAP groups. Conclusion UTAP blocks demonstrated reduced opioid use compared to LTAP and no TAP, likely due to enhanced accuracy with ultrasound guidance. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and refine pain management strategies for bariatric surgery patients.

摘要

引言

肥胖是美国一种患病率不断上升的主要疾病进程,且与多种合并症相关。减重手术,尤其是腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG),是一种有效的减肥干预措施,但在术后疼痛管理方面存在挑战。本研究比较了超声引导下腹横肌平面(UTAP)阻滞、腹腔镜引导下腹横肌平面(LTAP)阻滞以及不进行区域麻醉对LSG患者总体阿片类药物使用及术后结局的影响。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年1月至2023年6月在一家医院接受LSG的1239例肥胖患者。患者被分为以下三组:UTAP组、LTAP组和非腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞组。主要结局是术后24小时和48小时内使用的吗啡毫克当量(MME)总量,以及住院期间MME的平均用量(均以中位数四分位间距报告)。次要结局包括总麻醉时间、术后疼痛评分、住院时间(LOS)、30天再入院率和急诊就诊率。统计分析包括卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、独立t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和多元线性回归。

结果

与LTAP组(98.8 MME,p<0.0001)相比,UTAP组术后24小时内的MME中位数(63 MME)显著更低,且在整个住院期间也是如此(93 MME对120 MME,p=0.0004)。与非TAP阻滞组相比,UTAP组和LTAP组的MME总量均显著更低(两组p均<0.0001)。UTAP组的总麻醉时间(98.5分钟)比LTAP组长(92.5分钟,p=0.0472)。与LTAP组(1.18天)相比,UTAP组的住院时间显著更长(1.59天,p=0.0061)。UTAP组和LTAP组在各个时间点的疼痛评分、30天再入院率和急诊就诊率方面均无显著差异。

结论

与LTAP组和非TAP阻滞组相比,UTAP阻滞显示出阿片类药物使用减少,这可能是由于超声引导提高了准确性。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现,并完善减重手术患者的疼痛管理策略。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery.结直肠手术中加速康复外科路径的实施
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):102-108. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676474. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验