• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞优于切口浸润在减少腹腔镜手术后阿片类药物的使用。

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Is Superior to Port Site Infiltration in Reducing Post-Operative Opioid Use in Laparoscopic Surgery.

机构信息

12281University of North Dakota, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA.

Department of Graduate Medical Education-24195Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2022 Sep;88(9):2094-2099. doi: 10.1177/00031348221087923. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1177/00031348221087923
PMID:35481763
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can be time-consuming, costly, and technically challenging in the bariatric patient population. Laparoscopic-assisted TAP (L-TAP) block was developed and has been shown to be non-inferior to ultrasound-guided blocks. Postoperative pain can be significant, and pain control in the morbidly obese patients can be challenging. This study's aim was to compare L-TAP block to traditional port site infiltration in terms of postoperative opioid requirement for morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from February 2019 through February 2020. Two study groups: L-TAP block and port site infiltration. Outcomes examined the amount of opioid used at different time segments relative to the operation. All intravenous (IV) and oral opioids used were converted into IV morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for standardization.

RESULTS

150 patients were included. The patient characteristics were not statistically significant between the two groups. Post-operative opioid use trended lower in the L-TAP block group in all time segments. A significant difference was detected in IV opioid use during post-operative day 0 with the mean MME for the L-TAP block group being 1.1±3.8 and port site infiltration group being 2.8±4.5 (P = .02)

CONCLUSIONS

The L-TAP block more effectively reduces postoperative opioid use in comparison to port site infiltration in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Based on these findings, as well as the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of L-TAP blocks, its routine use in laparoscopy should be considered.

摘要

背景

在肥胖患者人群中,超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞可能既耗时又昂贵,并且技术上具有挑战性。腹腔镜辅助 TAP(L-TAP)阻滞已经被开发出来,并已被证明不劣于超声引导下阻滞。术后疼痛可能很明显,肥胖患者的疼痛控制可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是比较 L-TAP 阻滞与传统的端口部位浸润在腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路(RYGB)手术后肥胖患者术后阿片类药物需求方面的差异。

方法

回顾性图表审查于 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 2 月进行。两个研究组:L-TAP 阻滞和端口部位浸润。结果检查了与手术相关的不同时间段内使用的阿片类药物的数量。所有静脉(IV)和口服阿片类药物均转换为 IV 吗啡毫克当量(MME)进行标准化。

结果

共纳入 150 例患者。两组患者的特征在统计学上无显著差异。在所有时间段内,L-TAP 阻滞组的术后阿片类药物使用量呈下降趋势。在术后第 0 天,L-TAP 阻滞组的 IV 阿片类药物使用量存在显著差异,其平均 MME 为 1.1±3.8,而端口部位浸润组为 2.8±4.5(P=.02)。

结论

与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路(RYGB)手术中的端口部位浸润相比,L-TAP 阻滞更有效地减少了术后阿片类药物的使用。基于这些发现,以及 L-TAP 阻滞的效率和成本效益,应考虑在腹腔镜手术中常规使用。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Is Superior to Port Site Infiltration in Reducing Post-Operative Opioid Use in Laparoscopic Surgery.腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞优于切口浸润在减少腹腔镜手术后阿片类药物的使用。
Am Surg. 2022 Sep;88(9):2094-2099. doi: 10.1177/00031348221087923. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞作为术后加速康复(ERAS)方案中腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术多模式镇痛的一部分:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3376-8.
3
A comparative evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a critical evaluation on the impact of postoperative pain and opioid requirements.机器人与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的比较评估:术后疼痛和阿片类药物需求影响的批判性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7700-7708. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09124-x. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
The Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Timing on Milliequivalents of Opioid Use and Immediate Postoperative Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.经腹横肌平面阻滞时机对行微创子宫切除术患者术中使用的阿片类药物毫当量数和即刻术后疼痛评分的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Mar;31(3):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.12.013. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
5
Transversus abdominis plane block under laparoscopic guide versus port-site local anaesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.腹腔镜引导下腹横肌平面阻滞与切口局部麻醉浸润在子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜切除术中的比较:一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):647-654. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15502. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Port-Site Infiltration with Local Anesthetics in Bariatric Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与局部麻醉药切口浸润在减重手术中的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3383-3390. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06825-7. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
7
Preoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Bariatric Patients to Reduce the Use of Opioid Analgesics.术前腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞联合脂质体布比卡因用于肥胖患者以减少阿片类镇痛药的使用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1099-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03668-5.
8
Association of the addition of a transversus abdominis plane block to an enhanced recovery program with opioid consumption, postoperative antiemetic use, and discharge time in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study.在接受腹腔镜减重手术的患者中,添加腹横肌平面阻滞与增强恢复方案联合应用对阿片类药物消耗、术后止吐药使用和出院时间的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):180-186. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101009. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
9
Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative opioid requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜横腹肌腱膜平面阻滞可减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术后阿片类药物的需求。
Surgery. 2023 Mar;173(3):864-869. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.053. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain management and surgery side effects in laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.腹腔镜横腹平面阻滞对腹腔镜减重手术术后疼痛管理和手术副作用的疗效。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Mar;407(2):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02400-9. Epub 2022 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Analgesic efficacy of a laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus no transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric gastric bypass surgery a retrospective analysis among 332 individuals.腹腔镜引导下的腹横肌平面阻滞与未行腹横肌平面阻滞在减重胃旁路手术中的镇痛效果:332例患者的回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02880-2.
2
Nerve block techniques utilized in post-bariatric surgery: a narrative review.减肥手术后使用的神经阻滞技术:一项叙述性综述。
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02801-3.
3
Comparing Ultrasound- and Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Blocks in Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients.
比较袖状胃切除术患者中超声引导和腹腔镜引导下的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞
Cureus. 2024 Dec 19;16(12):e76033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76033. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Ultrasound guided-transabdominal plane block (UG-TAPB) reduces pain, opioid consumption and PONV, and is associated with faster recovery for patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis in a high-volume Italian center.超声引导下经腹横肌平面阻滞(UG-TAPB)可减轻肥胖症手术患者的疼痛、减少阿片类药物用量及术后恶心呕吐(PONV),并与更快的恢复相关:一项在意大利一家大型中心进行的回顾性分析。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
Laparoscopic assisted versus ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜辅助与超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜减重手术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 6;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02498-6.
6
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Port-Site Infiltration with Local Anesthetics in Bariatric Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与局部麻醉药切口浸润在减重手术中的比较:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3383-3390. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06825-7. Epub 2023 Sep 23.