Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 中肺部远程康复的完全远程与混合监督:一项随机临床试验

Fully remote versus hybrid supervision of pulmonary telerehabilitation in COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Vian Bruna S, Ratti Lígia S, Resende Mariangela R, de O Conterno Lucieni, Pereira Mônica C

机构信息

Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Service, University Hospital, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil -

Division of Pneumology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;61(1):141-153. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08634-9. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impeded the traditional rehabilitation process, prompting the widespread adoption of remote programs for the recovery of survivors.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a pulmonary telerehabilitation program (PTRP) in the exclusively remote modality versus the hybrid modality (remote and face-to-face) in patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, and to compare the functional capacity of patients who participated in a PTRP with those who did not.

DESIGN

A randomised, interventional, prospective clinical trial was conducted. In parallel, an observational cohort study was conducted.

SETTING

Outpatient rehabilitation clinic and home-based rehabilitation program.

POPULATION

Thirty patients post-COVID-19 were randomised into two groups: G1 (fully remote supervision of PTRP) or G2 (hybrid supervision of PTRP). Thirty-seven post-COVID-19 patients were followed up without participating in PTRP (non-intervention group - NIG).

METHODS

Patients with persistent respiratory dysfunction and reduced functional capacity, as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), after hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia, were considered eligible for a PTRP. To assess the efficacy of the PTRP, the primary outcome (I) was distance walked on the 6MWT (6MWD) and the secondary outcome (II) was quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Both G1 and G2 demonstrated similar improvement in 6MWD, P<0.001 and quality of life (P<0.05). The IG showed higher 6MWD than the NIG (P<0.001). The increase in 6MWD for the IG was 140.5 m, while for the NIG it was 16.8 m (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The PTRP was found to be a feasible and highly effective intervention for restoring functional capacity and improving quality of life, regardless of the type of supervision. Furthermore, this functional gain was maintained over the long term. In patients with pulmonary dysfunction, participation in the PTRP improved functional capacity compared with those who were simply advised to resume physical activity during recovery.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Telerehabilitation has been demonstrated to be a viable and efficacious alternative to traditional in-person programs in low-income contexts.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情带来的限制阻碍了传统康复进程,促使远程康复项目被广泛采用以帮助幸存者恢复。

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较肺部远程康复项目(PTRP)在完全远程模式与混合模式(远程和面对面结合)下,对新冠肺炎住院后仍存在持续呼吸功能障碍患者的有效性,并比较参与PTRP的患者与未参与患者的功能能力。

设计

进行了一项随机、干预性、前瞻性临床试验。同时,开展了一项观察性队列研究。

地点

门诊康复诊所和居家康复项目。

研究对象

30名新冠康复患者被随机分为两组:G1组(PTRP完全远程监督)或G2组(PTRP混合监督)。37名新冠康复患者未参与PTRP,进行随访(非干预组 - NIG)。

方法

新冠肺炎住院后,通过六分钟步行试验(6MWT)测量存在持续呼吸功能障碍且功能能力下降的患者被认为适合参加PTRP。为评估PTRP的疗效,主要结局指标(I)是6MWT的步行距离(6MWD),次要结局指标(II)是通过SF - 36问卷评估的生活质量。

结果

G1组和G2组在6MWD方面均有相似改善(P<0.001),生活质量也有改善(P<0.05)。干预组的6MWD高于非干预组(P<0.001)。干预组6MWD增加了140.5米,而非干预组增加了16.8米(P = 0.002)。

结论

无论监督类型如何,PTRP被认为是恢复功能能力和改善生活质量的可行且高效的干预措施。此外,这种功能改善在长期内得以维持。对于肺功能障碍患者,与仅被建议在恢复期间恢复体育活动的患者相比,参与PTRP可改善功能能力。

临床康复影响

在低收入环境中,远程康复已被证明是传统面对面项目的可行且有效的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f5/11920754/59f0c412b172/8634-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验