• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endometriosis in later life: an intersectional analysis from the perspective of epistemic injustice.晚年子宫内膜异位症:基于认知不公正视角的交叉性分析
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10245-4. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
2
Applying the Concept of Epistemic Injustice as a Philosophical Window to Examine Discrimination Experiences of LGBTQIA+ Migrants With Nurses.运用认识论不公正的概念作为哲学窗口,审视护士群体中 LGBTQIA+ 移民的歧视经历。
Nurs Philos. 2025 Jan;26(1):e70007. doi: 10.1111/nup.70007.
3
Ageism, Racism, Sexism, and Work With Older Healthcare Clients: Why an Intersectional Approach Is Needed in Practice, Policy, Education, and Research.年龄歧视、种族主义、性别歧视与为老年医疗保健客户工作:为何在实践、政策、教育和研究中需要采用交叉视角。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2024 Jan;98(1):27-38. doi: 10.1177/00914150231171843. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
'We Don't Have to Prove to People How We're Feeling': Understanding the Role of Peer Support Groups in Countering Epistemic Injustices in Long COVID at a US Centre.“我们不必向他人证明自己的感受”:在美国一个中心理解同伴支持小组在对抗长期新冠认知不公正方面的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70266. doi: 10.1111/hex.70266.
5
Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.认知斗争:倡导在促进心理健康中的认知正义和权利中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis.医疗保健中的认知不公正:哲学分析
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Nov;17(4):529-40. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2.
7
"It's the not being seen that is most tiresome": Older women, invisibility and social (in)justice.“最令人厌烦的是不被看见”:老年女性、隐形与社会(不)公正。
J Women Aging. 2023 Nov-Dec;35(6):557-572. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2023.2197658. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.探究慢性疼痛中的信任、专业知识与认知不公正
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare.医学和医疗保健中的认知团结。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):681-692. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10112-0. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
10
Striking the balance with epistemic injustice in healthcare: the case of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.在医疗保健中实现知识正义的平衡:慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎案例。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Sep;23(3):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09945-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Endometriosis in Menopausal Women-A New Age Is Coming? Literature Review.绝经后女性的子宫内膜异位症——新时代即将来临?文献综述
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;14(4):485. doi: 10.3390/life14040485.
2
The association of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the severity of menopause symptoms: a study of 68,864 women.种族、民族和社会经济地位对绝经症状严重程度的影响:一项对 68864 名女性的研究。
Menopause. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):476-483. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002349. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Female aging: when translational models don't translate.女性衰老:转化模型为何不适用。
Nat Aging. 2023 Dec;3(12):1500-1508. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00509-8. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
4
Undermine Sufferers' Testimonies to Avoid Social Impacts of Pain.诋毁患者的证词以避免疼痛带来的社会影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 6;11(9):1339. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091339.
5
Menopause knowledge and education in women under 40: Results from an online survey.绝经知识和教育在 40 岁以下女性中的应用:一项在线调查的结果。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221139660. doi: 10.1177/17455057221139660.
6
Menopause and healthcare professional education: A scoping review.绝经与医疗保健专业教育:范围综述。
Maturitas. 2022 Dec;166:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
Menopause, wellbeing and health: A care pathway from the European Menopause and Andropause Society.绝经、健康和幸福感:欧洲绝经和雄激素缺乏学会的护理路径。
Maturitas. 2022 Sep;163:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Revisiting the impact of race/ethnicity in endometriosis.重新审视种族/民族在子宫内膜异位症中的影响。
Reprod Fertil. 2022 Mar 17;3(2):R34-R41. doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0106. eCollection 2022 Apr 1.
9
ESHRE guideline: endometriosis.ESHRE 指南:子宫内膜异位症。
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 26;2022(2):hoac009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009. eCollection 2022.
10
A systematic review on the prevalence of endometriosis in women.一篇关于子宫内膜异位症在女性中的患病率的系统综述。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 Mar;154(3):446-454. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_817_18.

晚年子宫内膜异位症:基于认知不公正视角的交叉性分析

Endometriosis in later life: an intersectional analysis from the perspective of epistemic injustice.

作者信息

Langmann Elisabeth, Kainradl Anna-Christina, Weßel Merle, Rokvity Alekszandra

机构信息

Institute of Ethics and History of Health in Society, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care (CIRAC), University of Graz, Schubertstraße 23/I, Graz, 8010, Austria.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10245-4. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-024-10245-4
PMID:39704896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11805771/
Abstract

Endometriosis, a chronic inflammatory condition affecting 10% of biological women, is widely understudied and particularly overlooked in later life. Discussions surrounding endometriosis predominantly centre on medical gender bias during reproductive years, with limited attention to intersecting factors of discrimination and the impact of ageism on affected individuals. As endometriosis is framed as a disease of reproductive age, research is lacking when it comes to the effects of the illness on the older population. Symptoms in (post)menopausal individuals are frequently misattributed to other ailments due to ageist and sexist preconceptions, leading to prolonged diagnoses and mistreatment. This is a social justice issue in which age and sex contribute to the discrimination of a certain population - namely older biological women living with endometriosis. In this paper, we approach this issue from the perspective of epistemic justice. The experiences of the affected persons are shaped by a lack of knowledge about endometriosis among both the healthcare personal and the affected person, as well as a lack of acknowledgement and consideration of the persons experiences. Using the lens of epistemic justice, we develop an analytical model to understand the intersection of age and gender in the experiences of endometriosis patients. This article contributes to ongoing debates on epistemic injustice and intersectionality within medicine and healthcare, offering an analytical model that connects the critical approaches of epistemic injustice and intersectionality to address health injustice. Ultimately, this work advocates for a comprehensive, lifespan approach to endometriosis that acknowledges and addresses intersecting forms of discrimination.

摘要

子宫内膜异位症是一种影响10%育龄女性的慢性炎症性疾病,目前对其研究广泛不足,在晚年尤其被忽视。围绕子宫内膜异位症的讨论主要集中在生育年龄期间的医学性别偏见上,对歧视的交叉因素以及年龄歧视对患者的影响关注有限。由于子宫内膜异位症被视为一种育龄疾病,因此对于该疾病对老年人群的影响缺乏研究。由于年龄歧视和性别歧视的先入之见,(绝经后)个体的症状常常被误诊为其他疾病,导致诊断延误和治疗不当。这是一个社会正义问题,年龄和性别导致了对特定人群的歧视——即患有子宫内膜异位症的老年育龄女性。在本文中,我们从认知正义的角度探讨这个问题。患者的经历受到医疗人员和患者自身对子宫内膜异位症缺乏了解,以及对患者经历缺乏认可和考虑的影响。通过认知正义的视角,我们开发了一个分析模型,以理解子宫内膜异位症患者经历中年龄和性别的交叉点。本文有助于医学和医疗保健领域正在进行的关于认知不公正和交叉性的辩论,提供了一个将认知不公正和交叉性的关键方法联系起来以解决健康不公正问题的分析模型。最终,这项工作倡导采用一种全面的、贯穿一生的方法来应对子宫内膜异位症,承认并解决交叉形式的歧视。