Langmann Elisabeth, Kainradl Anna-Christina, Weßel Merle, Rokvity Alekszandra
Institute of Ethics and History of Health in Society, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care (CIRAC), University of Graz, Schubertstraße 23/I, Graz, 8010, Austria.
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10245-4. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Endometriosis, a chronic inflammatory condition affecting 10% of biological women, is widely understudied and particularly overlooked in later life. Discussions surrounding endometriosis predominantly centre on medical gender bias during reproductive years, with limited attention to intersecting factors of discrimination and the impact of ageism on affected individuals. As endometriosis is framed as a disease of reproductive age, research is lacking when it comes to the effects of the illness on the older population. Symptoms in (post)menopausal individuals are frequently misattributed to other ailments due to ageist and sexist preconceptions, leading to prolonged diagnoses and mistreatment. This is a social justice issue in which age and sex contribute to the discrimination of a certain population - namely older biological women living with endometriosis. In this paper, we approach this issue from the perspective of epistemic justice. The experiences of the affected persons are shaped by a lack of knowledge about endometriosis among both the healthcare personal and the affected person, as well as a lack of acknowledgement and consideration of the persons experiences. Using the lens of epistemic justice, we develop an analytical model to understand the intersection of age and gender in the experiences of endometriosis patients. This article contributes to ongoing debates on epistemic injustice and intersectionality within medicine and healthcare, offering an analytical model that connects the critical approaches of epistemic injustice and intersectionality to address health injustice. Ultimately, this work advocates for a comprehensive, lifespan approach to endometriosis that acknowledges and addresses intersecting forms of discrimination.
子宫内膜异位症是一种影响10%育龄女性的慢性炎症性疾病,目前对其研究广泛不足,在晚年尤其被忽视。围绕子宫内膜异位症的讨论主要集中在生育年龄期间的医学性别偏见上,对歧视的交叉因素以及年龄歧视对患者的影响关注有限。由于子宫内膜异位症被视为一种育龄疾病,因此对于该疾病对老年人群的影响缺乏研究。由于年龄歧视和性别歧视的先入之见,(绝经后)个体的症状常常被误诊为其他疾病,导致诊断延误和治疗不当。这是一个社会正义问题,年龄和性别导致了对特定人群的歧视——即患有子宫内膜异位症的老年育龄女性。在本文中,我们从认知正义的角度探讨这个问题。患者的经历受到医疗人员和患者自身对子宫内膜异位症缺乏了解,以及对患者经历缺乏认可和考虑的影响。通过认知正义的视角,我们开发了一个分析模型,以理解子宫内膜异位症患者经历中年龄和性别的交叉点。本文有助于医学和医疗保健领域正在进行的关于认知不公正和交叉性的辩论,提供了一个将认知不公正和交叉性的关键方法联系起来以解决健康不公正问题的分析模型。最终,这项工作倡导采用一种全面的、贯穿一生的方法来应对子宫内膜异位症,承认并解决交叉形式的歧视。