Lima Thiago Bezerra Wanderley E, Fonseca Jessica Danielle Medeiros da, Silva Ana Aline Marcelino da, Vieira Rayane Grayce da Silva, Montemezzo Dayane, Otto-Yáñez Matias, Torres-Castro Rodrigo, Júnior Mário Emílio Teixeira Dourado, Resqueti Vanessa Regiane, Fregonezi Guilherme Augusto de Freitas
PneumoCardioVascular Lab/Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes (HUOL), Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Laboratório de Inovação Tecnológica em Reabilitação, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0315846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315846. eCollection 2024.
The normalization process is important to determine the best approach for normalizing electromyographic signals from respiratory muscles in healthy subjects and those with ALS. The aim of this study is to compare different methods of normalizing the sEMG signal of respiratory muscles in both healthy subjects and those with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). This cross-sectional study was conducted in 67 subjects (50 healthy and 17 with ALS). The electrical activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (ESC), diaphragm (DIA), parasternal (PS), external intercostal (EI), external oblique (EO), and rectus abdominal (RA) muscles were analyzed during maximal inspiratory pressure maneuvers (MIP), maximal nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and maximal voluntary isometric contraction of SCM and ESC (MVICSCM/ESC) and RA (MVICRA) using surface electromyography (sEMG). In the healthy group, inspiratory and expiratory muscles displayed higher electrical activity during MVICSCM/ESC and MIVCRA maneuvers, respectively (p<0.05). In the ALS group, inspiratory muscle activity was higher during the SNIP maneuver, while expiratory muscles showed higher activity during MVICRA (p<0.05). Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the MVIC resulted in greater inspiratory muscle activity, being the ideal method of normalization for inspiratory and expiratory muscles in healthy subjects. In ALS patients, the SNIP maneuver resulted in greater inspiratory muscle activity, while MVIC resulted in greater muscle activity in expiratory muscles.
归一化过程对于确定健康受试者和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者呼吸肌肌电信号的最佳归一化方法很重要。本研究的目的是比较健康受试者和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者呼吸肌表面肌电信号(sEMG)的不同归一化方法。这项横断面研究在67名受试者中进行(50名健康受试者和17名ALS患者)。在最大吸气压力动作(MIP)、最大鼻吸气压力(SNIP)、最大呼气压力(MEP)以及胸锁乳突肌(SCM)和斜角肌(ESC)与腹直肌(RA)的最大自主等长收缩(MVICSCM/ESC和MVICRA)期间,使用表面肌电图(sEMG)分析了胸锁乳突肌(SCM)、斜角肌(ESC)、膈肌(DIA)、胸骨旁肌(PS)、肋间外肌(EI)、腹外斜肌(EO)和腹直肌(RA)的电活动。在健康组中,吸气肌和呼气肌在MVICSCM/ESC和MIVCRA动作期间分别表现出更高的电活动(p<0.05)。在ALS组中,吸气肌活动在SNIP动作期间更高,而呼气肌在MVICRA期间表现出更高的活动(p<0.05)。基于这些发现,可以得出结论,MVIC导致更大的吸气肌活动,是健康受试者吸气肌和呼气肌归一化的理想方法。在ALS患者中,SNIP动作导致更大的吸气肌活动,而MVIC导致呼气肌更大的肌肉活动。