• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1990年至2020年期间,作为“2030年计划生育倡议”的一部分,48个重点国家在减少现代避孕方法使用方面的社会经济不平等方面取得的进展:一项基于人群的分析。

Progress in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in the use of modern contraceptives in 48 focus countries as part of the FP2030 initiative between 1990 and 2020: a population-based analysis.

作者信息

Cardona Carolina, Rusatira Jean Christophe, Salmeron Carolina, Martinez-Baack Michelle, Rimon Jose G, Anglewicz Philip, Ahmed Saifuddin

机构信息

Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e38-e49. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00424-8.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00424-8
PMID:39706659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11659844/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increases in modern contraception use, socioeconomic inequalities in family planning persist. In this study, we aimed to measure progress in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) and demand for family planning satisfied by modern methods (mDFPS) in 48 countries as part of the Family Planning 2030 (FP2030) initiative between 1990 and 2020 for which Demographic and Health Survey data were available.

METHODS

We analysed two rounds of Demographic and Health Survey data per country. Changes in concentration indices between two survey rounds were compared to measure reductions in overall socioeconomic-related inequalities in modern contraceptive use. Poisson regression models were used to measure the adjusted average annual rate of change across wealth quintiles.

FINDINGS

In this population-based analysis study, all countries reduced socioeconomic-related inequalities in modern contraceptive use among in-union women of reproductive age (15-49 years) during the observed 30-year period. On average, mCPR increased at an annual rate of 2·1% (95% CI 2·1-2·2), and the rate of increase for the poorest women was 3·1% (3·0-3·2), which outpaced the rate of increase for the richest women of 1·3% (1·3-1·4%). The pattern of progress was similar for mDFPS, but at a slower pace. Overall, levels of mCPR and mDFPS increased, and socioeconomic-related inequalities were reduced during this period.

INTERPRETATION

Substantial progress has been made in reducing socioeconomic-related inequalities in family planning across the 48 studied countries, which account for 86% of the population of the 82 FP2030 initiative countries. During the past three decades, poorer women have seen greater improvements in modern contraceptive use and demand satisfaction compared with richer women. As contraceptive prevalence rates are near their maximum, it is crucial to ensure marginalised and vulnerable groups are not left behind.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

TRANSLATIONS

For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

尽管现代避孕措施的使用有所增加,但计划生育方面的社会经济不平等现象依然存在。在本研究中,作为“2030年计划生育”(FP2030)倡议的一部分,我们旨在衡量1990年至2020年期间48个国家在减少现代避孕普及率(mCPR)和现代方法满足的计划生育需求(mDFPS)方面的社会经济不平等方面取得的进展,这些国家可获取人口与健康调查数据。

方法

我们分析了每个国家两轮的人口与健康调查数据。比较两轮调查之间集中指数的变化,以衡量现代避孕使用中总体社会经济相关不平等现象的减少情况。使用泊松回归模型来衡量各财富五分位数的调整后平均年变化率。

结果

在这项基于人群的分析研究中,在观察到的30年期间,所有国家都减少了育龄(15 - 49岁)已婚女性在现代避孕使用方面的社会经济相关不平等现象。平均而言,mCPR以每年2.1%(95%CI 2.1 - 2.2)的速度增长,最贫困女性的增长率为3.1%(3.0 - 3.2),超过了最富有女性1.3%(1.3 - 1.4%)的增长率。mDFPS的进展模式相似,但速度较慢。总体而言,在此期间mCPR和mDFPS水平有所提高,社会经济相关不平等现象有所减少。

解读

在48个被研究国家中,在减少计划生育方面的社会经济相关不平等现象方面取得了重大进展,这些国家占82个FP2030倡议国家人口的86%。在过去三十年中,与富裕女性相比,贫困女性在现代避孕使用和需求满足方面有了更大的改善。由于避孕普及率已接近最高水平,确保边缘化和弱势群体不被落下至关重要。

资金来源

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

翻译

摘要的法语和西班牙语翻译见补充材料部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/6da3410f6793/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d2a22aa88228/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/5af5e49a57d4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/2dffc64f7096/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d096870bf0a0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d9d2ecabb0e1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/6da3410f6793/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d2a22aa88228/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/5af5e49a57d4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/2dffc64f7096/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d096870bf0a0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/d9d2ecabb0e1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9e/11659844/6da3410f6793/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Progress in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in the use of modern contraceptives in 48 focus countries as part of the FP2030 initiative between 1990 and 2020: a population-based analysis.1990年至2020年期间,作为“2030年计划生育倡议”的一部分,48个重点国家在减少现代避孕方法使用方面的社会经济不平等方面取得的进展:一项基于人群的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e38-e49. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00424-8.
2
Inequality in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception among women of reproductive age in Zambia. A trend and decomposition analysis 2007-2018.赞比亚育龄妇女现代避孕方法使用情况及未满足的避孕需求的不平等。2007 - 2018年趋势与分解分析
Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 9;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01909-8.
3
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕使用教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.
4
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.改善感染艾滋病毒女性避孕措施使用情况的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 9;2016(8):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub3.
5
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people.提高年轻人避孕措施使用率的简短教育策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 30;3(3):CD012025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012025.pub2.
6
School-based interventions for improving contraceptive use in adolescents.以学校为基础的干预措施,用于提高青少年的避孕措施使用率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 29;2016(6):CD012249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012249.
7
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Theory-based interventions for contraception.基于理论的避孕干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5.
10
Association between alcohol use and femicide in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间南非饮酒与女性杀人案之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jul;13(7):e1291-e1300. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00115-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between women's empowerment and use of modern contraception methods in Bangladesh: evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2022.孟加拉国妇女赋权与现代避孕方法使用之间的关联:来自2022年孟加拉国人口与健康调查的证据
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Jul 18;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00383-2.
2
Perception and experiences of having children and contraceptive use among women in low-income groups: a qualitative study.低收入群体女性生育观念与避孕经历的质性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08058-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequalities in demand satisfied with modern methods of family planning among women aged 15-49 years: a secondary data analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys of six South Asian countries.15-49 岁女性对现代计划生育方法需求满足情况的不平等:对 6 个南亚国家人口与健康调查的二次数据分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):e049630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049630.
2
The wealth gradient and the effect of COVID-19 restrictions on income loss, food insecurity and health care access in four sub-Saharan African geographies.四个撒哈拉以南非洲地理区域的财富梯度和 COVID-19 限制对收入损失、粮食不安全和获得医疗保健的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 15;16(12):e0260823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260823. eCollection 2021.
3
Assessing Wealth-Related Inequalities in Demand for Family Planning Satisfied in 43 African Countries.
评估43个非洲国家计划生育需求满足情况中与财富相关的不平等现象。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Jul 26;2:674227. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.674227. eCollection 2021.
4
COVID-19 and Global Income Inequality.新冠疫情与全球收入不平等
LSE Public Policy Rev. 2021;1(4). doi: 10.31389/lseppr.26. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Wealth-related inequalities in demand for family planning satisfied among married and unmarried adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲已婚和未婚青少年女孩及年轻妇女对计划生育需求的与财富相关的不平等。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(Suppl 1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01076-0.
6
Socio-demographic and economic inequalities in modern contraception in 11 low- and middle-income countries: an analysis of the PMA2020 surveys.11 个中低收入国家现代避孕方法使用的社会人口经济学不平等:PMA2020 调查分析。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 1;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00931-w.
7
Inequalities in reproductive health care use in five West-African countries: A decomposition analysis of the wealth-based gaps.五个西非国家生殖健康服务利用的不平等:基于财富差距的分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 27;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01167-7.
8
Time trends in demand for family planning satisfied: analysis of 73 countries using national health surveys over a 24-year period.计划生育需求的时间趋势:24 年间 73 个国家利用国家卫生调查进行的分析。
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020423. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020423.
9
Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification.比较模型误设下对数二项式和稳健泊松回归模型估计风险比的性能。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0519-5.
10
conindex: Estimation of concentration indices.浓度指数:浓度指数的估计。
Stata J. 2016;16(1):112-138.