Suppr超能文献

激光荧光在评估各种龋病去除技术中的准确性:一项体外验证研究

Accuracy of laser fluorescence in assessment of various caries removal techniques: an in vitro validation.

作者信息

Kanar Özlem, Tağtekin Dilek, Korkut Bora, Yanıkoğlu Funda, Kargül Betül

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Complex Health Campus, Başıbüyük Yolu 9/3 34854 Başıbüyük, Maltepe, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Kent University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):1529. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05323-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of laser fluorescence (LF) readings in detection of caries removal by various techniques (CRTs).

METHODS

A hundred and eighty extracted human molar teeth included in the study which were scored 3, 4, and 5 according to ICDAS. Each score group was randomly assigned to 4 subgroups according to CRT including ceramic bur (Group A), carbide bur (Group B), carbide bur with alumina abrasion (Group C), and carbide bur with bioactive glass (BAG) abrasion (Group D) (n = 15 for each group). A LF device (DIAGNOdent Pen, Kavo) was used to determine remaining caries. Histological sections of the teeth were examined under a dental operating microscope for validation. The data were analyzed using Fisher Freeman Halton, Fisher's Exact, Pearson Chi-Square, Bonferroni Adjusted Z tests, ROC analysis, Kappa statistic and Binary Logistic Regression(p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Histological examination revealed no significant differences among the CRTs and ICDAS scores (p > 0.05 for each). However, a significant difference was found between histological assessment and LF in ICDAS 5 score, specifically between Group B and Group D (p = 0.022), regarding caries presence. LF readings demonstrated over 0.9 area under curve (AUC) value regardless of CRT, except for ICDAS-4 score, and Group D in ICDAS-5 score. Overall, the AUC of LF was found to be 0.880 for the 38 cut-off point (p < 0.001), indicating a high level of accuracy. The univariate and multiple models showed the tested CRTs had no effect on the caries presence (p > 0.050).

CONCLUSIONS

The CRTs examined in this study demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of caries removal. However, the application of bioactive glass on caries-affected dentin may lead to overestimations in the LF readings. Additionally, LF on the cavity floor may not be clinically suitable for teeth with ICDAS 4 scores.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The clinical determination of caries removal endpoint is based on a multifactorial decision. However, when selective removal of soft dentin is performed, especially with bioactive glass abrasion in deep caries lesions, higher cut-off points might be determined in laser fluorescence readings to decide further operative intervention.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估激光荧光(LF)读数在检测各种龋病去除技术(CRT)去除龋坏组织方面的准确性。

方法

本研究纳入180颗拔除的人类磨牙,根据国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)进行评分,分为3分、4分和5分三组。每个评分组根据CRT随机分为4个亚组,包括陶瓷车针组(A组)、硬质合金车针组(B组)、氧化铝研磨硬质合金车针组(C组)和生物活性玻璃(BAG)研磨硬质合金车针组(D组)(每组n = 15)。使用LF设备(DIAGNOdent Pen,卡瓦公司)确定剩余龋坏。对牙齿的组织学切片在牙科手术显微镜下进行检查以进行验证。使用Fisher Freeman Halton检验、Fisher精确检验、Pearson卡方检验、Bonferroni校正Z检验、ROC分析、Kappa统计量和二元逻辑回归分析数据(p < 0.05)。

结果

组织学检查显示CRT和ICDAS评分之间无显著差异(每项p > 0.05)。然而,在ICDAS 5分的情况下,组织学评估和LF之间存在显著差异,特别是B组和D组之间(p = 0.022),关于龋病的存在情况。除ICDAS - 4分以及ICDAS - 5分的D组外,无论CRT如何,LF读数的曲线下面积(AUC)值均超过0.9。总体而言,LF在38的截断点时AUC为0.880(p < 0.001),表明准确性较高。单因素和多因素模型显示所测试的CRT对龋病的存在没有影响(p > 0.050)。

结论

本研究中检查的CRT在去除龋坏组织方面显示出相似的疗效。然而,在受龋病影响的牙本质上应用生物活性玻璃可能导致LF读数高估。此外,对于ICDAS评分为4分的牙齿,窝洞底部的LF在临床上可能不适用。

临床相关性

龋病去除终点的临床判定基于多因素决策。然而,当进行选择性去除软牙本质时,特别是在深龋病变中使用生物活性玻璃研磨时,在激光荧光读数中可能需要确定更高的截断点来决定进一步的手术干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b9/11662415/a726e4a35ce1/12903_2024_5323_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

10
Performance of laser fluorescence at tooth surface and histological section.激光荧光在牙面和组织切片上的性能。
Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Mar;26(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0768-y. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

6
STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies (STARCARDDS).STAndard 报告的 CAries 检测和诊断研究(STARCARDDS)。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1947-1955. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04173-3. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验