Hodson Nathan, Majid Madiha, James Richard, Graham Eileen K, Mroczek Daniel K, Beidas Rinad S
Unit of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Feb;30(1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/camh.12746. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
To evaluate the effect of financial incentives on engagement in parenting programs for disruptive behavior disorders, as well as effect on child behavior. As a secondary aim, demographic differences were investigated as effect modifiers.
We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Cochrane Trials, and PsycINFO for randomized controlled trials and quasi experimental studies offering parents a financial incentive for engagement with parenting programs targeting disruptive behavior in children aged under 18, vs no incentive. Engagement in each group was evaluated at four stages: connection, attendance, participation, and enaction. Per protocol (CRD42022336210) random effects meta-analysis was conducted using Stata-16. Meta-analyses of binary data used a log odds ratio and continuous data was standardized using Hedges' g.
We identified 2438 papers and screened 35 at full length. We included eight independent cohorts from seven papers. Parents invited to incentive arms were more likely to complete a threshold of sessions than parents invited to control arms (odds ratio 2.51 95% CI 1.42-4.48). Parents were more likely to agree to participate when they knew they were joining the incentive program (odds ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.65) and parents in the incentive group were more likely than parents in the control group to reach a completion threshold of sessions (odds ratio 1.76 95% CI 1.17-2.66).
Incentives increase parenting programs engagement among parents who are invited and among parents who have begun attending programs. Incentives are an effective potential tool for increasing engagement but further research is needed to establish acceptability and optimal design.
评估经济激励措施对患有破坏性行为障碍儿童的家长参与育儿项目的影响,以及对儿童行为的影响。作为次要目标,研究人口统计学差异作为效应修饰因素。
我们在PubMed、CINAHL、社会学文摘、Cochrane试验和PsycINFO中检索随机对照试验和准实验研究,这些研究为家长提供经济激励以参与针对18岁以下儿童破坏性行为的育儿项目,与无激励措施的情况进行对比。对每组在四个阶段进行参与度评估:联系、出勤、参与和实施。按照方案(CRD42022336210)使用Stata-16进行随机效应荟萃分析。二元数据的荟萃分析使用对数优势比,连续数据使用Hedges' g进行标准化。
我们识别出2438篇论文并全文筛选了35篇。我们纳入了来自七篇论文的八个独立队列。被邀请参加激励组的家长比被邀请参加对照组的家长更有可能完成一定数量的课程(优势比2.51,95%置信区间1.42 - 4.48)。当家长知道自己加入激励项目时,他们更有可能同意参与(优势比1.40,95%置信区间1.20 - 1.65),并且激励组的家长比对照组的家长更有可能达到课程完成门槛(优势比1.76,95%置信区间1.17 - 2.66)。
激励措施增加了被邀请家长以及已开始参加项目的家长对育儿项目的参与度。激励措施是提高参与度的一种有效潜在工具,但需要进一步研究以确定其可接受性和最佳设计。