Chua Michael, Tse Lai Nam, Rickard Mandy, Wang Peter, Silangcruz Jan Michael, Dos Santos Joana, Varghese Abby, Brownrigg Natasha, Ming Jessica, Lorenzo Armando, Bagli Darius
Global Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Health Care Transit. 2023 Aug 22;1:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100013. eCollection 2023.
To generate a scoping review that summarizes perceptions and attitudes of urology providers towards the transitional urologic care process. Likewise, summarize their identified barriers, facilitators, and ideal transition care for patients with genitourinary conditions.
A systematic literature search was performed in Oct 2021. Records were identified for studies relevant to assessing urology specialists' practice variation, perception of barriers, and attitudes toward transitional care of patients needing life-long urologic care. The methodological quality of the cross-sectional studies was assessed using AXIS. The information extracted was clustered according to identified themes from the included studies. This scoping review was part of a systematic review registered on PROSPERO-(CRD42022306229).
A total of 641 records were retrieved from electronic medical databases and cross-referencing. Ultimately, ten studies were included in this scoping review, conducted in the USA (n = 7), Canada, United Kingdom, and Italy. There is a wide variation in transitional care practices and preferences. However, the common themes extracted were: appropriate age to start the transition, additional training of the providers involved in transitional care, common transition plans, and practices, characteristics of multidisciplinary teams, potential barriers, areas of improvement, or facilitators for a better transitional process.
Common to all reports, multiple barriers are perceived. Areas that require improvement and multidisciplinary systems are needed to enhance urologic transition care. In addition, factors such as the age cut-off between pediatric and adult care or which specialist should handle specific procedures and conditions before, during, and after transition are still unclear and typically depend on the stakeholders.
进行一项范围综述,总结泌尿外科医护人员对泌尿外科过渡性护理过程的看法和态度。同样,总结他们所确定的影响因素、促进因素以及针对泌尿生殖系统疾病患者的理想过渡性护理。
2021年10月进行了系统的文献检索。识别出与评估泌尿外科专家的实践差异、对障碍的认知以及对需要终身泌尿外科护理的患者过渡性护理态度相关的研究记录。使用AXIS评估横断面研究的方法学质量。提取的信息根据纳入研究中确定的主题进行归类。本范围综述是在PROSPERO上注册的系统综述的一部分(注册号:CRD42022306229)。
通过电子医学数据库检索和交叉引用共获取641条记录。最终,本范围综述纳入了10项研究,这些研究分别在美国(n = 7)、加拿大、英国和意大利开展。过渡性护理实践和偏好存在很大差异。然而,提取出的共同主题包括:开始过渡的合适年龄、参与过渡性护理的医护人员的额外培训、常见的过渡计划和实践、多学科团队的特点、潜在障碍、改进领域或促进更好过渡过程的因素。
所有报告都指出存在多种障碍。需要改进的领域以及多学科系统来加强泌尿外科过渡性护理。此外,诸如儿科和成人护理之间的年龄界限,或者在过渡前、过渡期间和过渡后应由哪位专家处理特定程序和病情等因素仍不明确,通常取决于利益相关者。