• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚吸烟者和非吸烟者对香烟包装上图片警示的比较认知及影响

A comparative perception and impact of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging among Malaysian smokers and non-smokers.

作者信息

Yahya Nurul Asyikin, Mohamed Kutty Nur Aqilah, Saleh Nurul Afira

机构信息

Department of Family Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Dec 18;12:e18713. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18713. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.18713
PMID:39713134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11662890/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that pictorial warnings on tobacco products be used to educate consumers on the negative health impacts associated with tobacco use. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging among smokers and non-smokers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted in Kuala Lumpur. Four components assessed the respondents' socio-demographics, smoking status, perceptions, and impact of pictorial warnings. Six standard cigarette pictorial warning images were included in the questionnaire. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 29.0. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical data, while means and standard deviations were used for continuous data. Statistically significant results were set at -value < 0.05. Non-parametric tests, the Chi-square test and the One-Way ANOVA test were used to calculate the differences between the variables, as the data was not normally distributed.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-eight respondents participated in this study, with smokers and non-smokers divided equally, 189. Most respondents were 20-29 years old ( = 223, 59.0%) and had tertiary education ( = 207, 54.8%). Most smokers were male ( = 172, 91.0%), and most non-smokers were female ( = 119, 63.0%). Most respondents ( = 364, 96.3%, = 0.276) noticed the pictorial warnings on cigarette packs. Nevertheless, significantly ( < 0.001) more smokers ( = 73, 38.6%) seldomly read the content compared to non-smokers ( = 57, 30.2%). Most smokers ( = 48, 12.7%) sometimes consider quitting smoking upon exposure to pictorial warnings on cigarette packs. However, most non-smokers ( = 161, 42.6%) never had the urge to smoke upon looking at the pictorial warnings. The most impactful image on cigarette packs among smokers was 'Lung cancer' ( = 74, 39.2%), while for non-smokers was 'Mouth cancer' ( = 59, 31.2%) with < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

While non-smokers demonstrated greater engagement with and emotional responses to the warnings, smokers showed less frequent interaction and a tendency toward desensitisation. Although pictorial warnings play a vital role in raising awareness of the health risks of smoking, particularly lung and mouth cancer, their effectiveness in encouraging smoking cessation among smokers remains limited.

摘要

引言

2003年,世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在烟草制品上使用图片警示,以教育消费者了解与烟草使用相关的负面健康影响。本研究旨在评估香烟包装上的图片警示对吸烟者和非吸烟者的有效性。

方法

在吉隆坡进行了一项使用自填式问卷的横断面研究。四个部分评估了受访者的社会人口统计学特征、吸烟状况、认知以及图片警示的影响。问卷中包含了六张标准的香烟图片警示图像。收集到的数据使用SPSS 29.0版本进行分析。分类数据使用频率和百分比表示,连续数据使用均值和标准差表示。统计学显著结果设定为p值<0.05。由于数据非正态分布,使用非参数检验、卡方检验和单因素方差分析来计算变量之间的差异。

结果

378名受访者参与了本研究,吸烟者和非吸烟者各189名,人数相等。大多数受访者年龄在20 - 29岁之间(n = 223,59.0%),拥有高等教育学历(n = 207,54.8%)。大多数吸烟者为男性(n = 172,91.0%),大多数非吸烟者为女性(n = 119,63.0%)。大多数受访者(n = 364,96.3%,p = 0.276)注意到了香烟包装上的图片警示。然而,与非吸烟者(n = 57,30.2%)相比,吸烟者中很少阅读警示内容的比例显著更高(p < 0.001)(n = 73,38.6%)。大多数吸烟者(n = 48,12.7%)在看到香烟包装上的图片警示后有时会考虑戒烟。然而,大多数非吸烟者(n = 161,42.6%)在看到图片警示后从未有过吸烟的冲动。吸烟者中对香烟包装影响最大的图片是“肺癌”(n = 74,39.2%),而非吸烟者中是“口腔癌”(n = 59,31.2%),p < 0.001。

结论

虽然非吸烟者对警示的参与度更高且情感反应更强烈,但吸烟者与警示的互动较少且有脱敏倾向。尽管图片警示在提高对吸烟健康风险(特别是肺癌和口腔癌)的认识方面发挥了重要作用,但其在鼓励吸烟者戒烟方面的有效性仍然有限。

相似文献

1
A comparative perception and impact of pictorial warnings on cigarette packaging among Malaysian smokers and non-smokers.马来西亚吸烟者和非吸烟者对香烟包装上图片警示的比较认知及影响
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 18;12:e18713. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18713. eCollection 2024.
2
[How smokers perceive pictorial and non-pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: An online survey].[吸烟者如何看待香烟包装上的图片和非图片健康警示:一项在线调查]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2025 Jan 9;71(12):756-765. doi: 10.11236/jph.24-009. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs among Lebanese school and university students.图片健康警示对黎巴嫩中小学生及大学生在香烟包装上的效果。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e72-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050745. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
4
Trajectories of Responses to Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings.对图片卷烟包装警示的反应轨迹。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):876-881. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx182.
5
Cigarette packaging and health warnings: the impact of plain packaging and message framing on young smokers.香烟包装与健康警示:素面包装及信息呈现方式对年轻吸烟者的影响
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e87-92. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051234. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
6
Frequency and Content of Conversations About Pictorial Warnings on Cigarette Packs.关于香烟包装上的图形警示语的对话频率和内容。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jun 7;20(7):882-887. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx180.
7
Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.香烟包装图案警示对吸烟行为变化的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2621.
8
Implicit motivational impact of pictorial health warning on cigarette packs.烟盒图形健康警示的潜在动机影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e72117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072117. eCollection 2013.
9
Perceptions and acceptability of pictorial health warning labels vs text only--a cross-sectional study in Lao PDR.图文健康警示标签与纯文字警示标签的认知度和可接受性——老挝的一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 28;15:1094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2415-9.
10
The lower effectiveness of text-only health warnings in China compared to pictorial health warnings in Malaysia.中国的文字健康警语效果不如马来西亚的图像健康警语。
Tob Control. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 4:iv6-13. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052616. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The pattern in prevalence and sociodemographic factors of smoking in Malaysia, 2011-2019: Findings from national surveys.2011 - 2019年马来西亚吸烟流行情况及社会人口学因素模式:全国调查结果
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Oct 1;20:84. doi: 10.18332/tid/152410. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessment of association between smoking and all-cause mortality among Malaysian adult population: Findings from a retrospective cohort study.马来西亚成年人群吸烟与全因死亡率之间关联的评估:一项回顾性队列研究的结果
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 May 31;20:50. doi: 10.18332/tid/147656. eCollection 2022.
3
Emotional Impact of Graphic Health Warnings on Tobacco Packaging: Analysis of Their Content.
图形健康警示对烟草包装的情感影响:对其内容的分析
Eur J Psychol. 2022 Feb 25;18(1):40-52. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2885. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
A Qualitative Study of Pictorial Health Warnings on Malaysian Cigarette Packs: How Do the Adults Understand Them?马来西亚香烟包装上图片健康警示的定性研究:成年人如何理解这些警示?
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;9(12):1669. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121669.
5
Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.美国年轻成年人全国代表性样本中对图片与仅文字雪茄烟警示语的反应。
Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):211-217. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056288. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年吸烟流行率、时空分布特征及归因疾病负担:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2337-2360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01169-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Impact of Pictorial Cigarette Warnings Compared With Surgeon General's Warnings on Understanding of the Negative Health Consequences of Smoking.图片警语与卫生署署长警语对理解吸烟之负面健康后果的影响比较。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1795-1804. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa032.
8
Impact of nations meeting the MPOWER targets between 2014 and 2016: an update.各国在 2014 年至 2016 年期间实现 MPOWER 目标的影响:最新情况。
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):231-233. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054837. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings on changes in smoking behaviour in Asia: a literature review.亚洲地区图形健康警示对吸烟行为改变效果的认知:文献综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):1165. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6072-7.
10
Desensitisation to cigarette package graphic health warnings: a cohort comparison between London and Singapore.对香烟包装图形健康警示的脱敏:伦敦与新加坡的队列比较
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e012693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012693.