• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.机器学习预测接受新辅助全身治疗的乳腺癌患者发生与治疗相关毒性的个体风险
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Dec;8:e2400010. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00010. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Predicting Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: Development of Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models in a Retrospective Study.预测乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗后的病理完全缓解:一项回顾性研究中基于机器学习的预测模型的开发
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 18;11:e64685. doi: 10.2196/64685.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
7
An artificial intelligence model to predict mortality among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective validated cohort study.一种预测血液透析患者死亡率的人工智能模型:一项回顾性验证队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06576-8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Prediction of additional hospital days in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with machine learning methods.运用机器学习方法预测行颈椎手术患者的额外住院天数。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2024 Dec;29(1):2345066. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2024.2345066. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
10
Proposal for Using AI to Assess Clinical Data Integrity and Generate Metadata: Algorithm Development and Validation.关于使用人工智能评估临床数据完整性并生成元数据的提案:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 30;13:e60204. doi: 10.2196/60204.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning-Assisted Analysis of the Oral Cancer Immune Microenvironment: From Single-Cell Level to Prognostic Model Construction.机器学习辅助的口腔癌免疫微环境分析:从单细胞水平到预后模型构建
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Jun;29(11):e70637. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70637.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction to techniques for data pre-processing, hyperparameter tuning, and model comparison.机器学习在医学中的应用:数据预处理、超参数调优和模型比较技术的实用介绍。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 1;22(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01758-8.
2
Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南:乳腺癌》第 3.2022 版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jun;20(6):691-722. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030.
3
Systematic Bias in Medical Algorithms: To Include or Not Include Discriminatory Demographic Information?医学算法中的系统偏差:是否纳入歧视性人口统计学信息?
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Feb;6:e2100146. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00146.
4
Intelligent Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy to Identify Breast Cancer Patients With Pathologic Complete Response (ypT0 and ypN0) After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Omission of Breast and Axillary Surgery.智能真空辅助活检识别新辅助全身治疗后省略乳房和腋窝手术的乳腺癌患者的病理完全缓解(ypT0 和 ypN0)。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;40(17):1903-1915. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02439. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Contrast of Digital and Health Literacy Between IT and Health Care Specialists Highlights the Importance of Multidisciplinary Teams for Digital Health-A Pilot Study.数字素养与健康素养在 IT 专家和医疗保健专家之间的对比凸显了多学科团队在数字健康方面的重要性——一项试点研究。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jun;5:734-745. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00032.
6
Updated recommendations regarding the management of older patients with breast cancer: a joint paper from the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).关于老年乳腺癌患者管理的最新建议:欧洲乳腺肿瘤学会(EUSOMA)和国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)的联合文件。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):e327-e340. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30741-5. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up.朝着乳腺癌手术中的以患者为中心的决策发展:预测 1 年随访时个体患者报告结局的机器学习方法。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e144-e152. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
8
Long-term patient reported outcomes and hematologic toxicity among patients who received Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors during chemotherapy for early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌化疗中应用粒细胞集落刺激因子的患者的长期患者报告结局和血液学毒性。
Breast. 2021 Jun;57:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
9
The Impact of AC and AC-T Chemotherapy's Toxicities on Quality of Life Among Women with Breast Cancer in Ethiopia: A Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes Study.埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌女性中AC和AC-T化疗毒性对生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性患者报告结局研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Feb 24;13:107-132. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S289014. eCollection 2021.
10
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

机器学习预测接受新辅助全身治疗的乳腺癌患者发生与治疗相关毒性的个体风险

Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.

作者信息

Cai Lie, Deutsch Thomas M, Sidey-Gibbons Chris, Kobel Michelle, Riedel Fabian, Smetanay Katharina, Fremd Carlo, Michel Laura, Golatta Michael, Heil Joerg, Schneeweiss Andreas, Pfob André

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care (Integrated Systems for Patient-Reported Data), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Dec;8:e2400010. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00010. Epub 2024 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00010
PMID:39715466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11670908/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Toxicity to systemic cancer treatment represents a major anxiety for patients and a challenge to treatment plans. We aimed to develop machine learning algorithms for the upfront prediction of an individual's risk of experiencing treatment-relevant toxicity during the course of treatment.

METHODS

Clinical records were retrieved from a single-center, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. We developed and validated machine learning algorithms to predict grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, deviation of liver enzymes, nephrotoxicity, thrombopenia, electrolyte disturbance, or neuropathy). We used 10-fold cross-validation to develop two algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty [GLM] and support vector machines [SVMs]). Algorithm predictions were compared with documented toxicity events and diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

A total of 590 patients were identified, 432 in the development set and 158 in the validation set. The median age was 51 years, and 55.8% (329 of 590) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The performance improved significantly when adding referenced treatment information (referenced regimen, referenced summation dose intensity product) in addition to patient and tumor variables: GLM AUROC 0.59 versus 0.75, = .02; SVM AUROC 0.64 versus 0.75, = .01.

CONCLUSION

The individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity can be predicted using machine learning algorithms. We demonstrate a promising way to improve efficacy and facilitate proactive toxicity management of systemic cancer treatment.

摘要

目的

全身癌症治疗的毒性是患者的主要担忧,也是治疗计划面临的挑战。我们旨在开发机器学习算法,用于在治疗过程中预先预测个体发生与治疗相关毒性的风险。

方法

从一个单中心连续队列中检索接受早期乳腺癌新辅助治疗患者的临床记录。我们开发并验证了机器学习算法以预测3级或4级毒性(贫血、中性粒细胞减少、肝酶偏差、肾毒性、血小板减少、电解质紊乱或神经病变)。我们使用10折交叉验证来开发两种算法(带弹性网罚项的逻辑回归[GLM]和支持向量机[SVM])。将算法预测结果与记录的毒性事件进行比较,并通过曲线下面积(AUROC)评估诊断性能。

结果

共纳入590例患者,其中432例在开发集,158例在验证集。中位年龄为51岁,55.8%(590例中的329例)发生3级或4级毒性。除患者和肿瘤变量外,加入参考治疗信息(参考方案、参考总剂量强度乘积)时性能显著提高:GLM的AUROC从0.59提高到0.75,P = 0.02;SVM的AUROC从0.64提高到0.75,P = 0.01。

结论

可使用机器学习算法预测与治疗相关毒性的个体风险。我们展示了一种有望提高全身癌症治疗疗效并促进主动毒性管理的方法。