• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朝着乳腺癌手术中的以患者为中心的决策发展:预测 1 年随访时个体患者报告结局的机器学习方法。

Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up.

机构信息

Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value & Experience (PROVE) Center, Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e144-e152. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862
PMID:33914464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9762704/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction. Current decision-making relies on group-level evidence which may lead to suboptimal treatment recommendations for individuals.

METHODS

We trained, tested, and validated 3 machine learning algorithms using data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction conducted at eleven study sites in North America from 2011 to 2016. Data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction were collected before surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Data from 10 of the 11 sites were randomly split into training and test samples (2:1 ratio) to develop and test 3 algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty, extreme gradient boosting tree, and neural network) which were further validated using the additional site's data.AUC to predict clinically-significant changes in satisfaction with breasts at 1-year follow-up using the validated BREAST-Q were the outcome measures.

RESULTS

The 3 algorithms performed equally well when predicting both improved or decreased satisfaction with breasts in both testing and validation datasets: For the testing dataset median accuracy = 0.81 (range 0.73-0.83), median AUC = 0.84 (range 0.78-0.85). For the validation dataset median accuracy = 0.83 (range 0.81-0.84), median AUC = 0.86 (range 0.83-0.89).

CONCLUSION

Individual patient-reported outcomes can be accurately predicted using machine learning algorithms, which may facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women undergoing breast cancer treatment.

摘要

目的

我们开发、测试和验证了机器学习算法,以预测接受乳腺癌相关乳房切除术和重建的患者在 1 年随访时的个体报告结局,从而为接受乳腺癌治疗的女性提供个体化、以患者为中心的决策。

背景资料概要

对接受癌症相关乳房切除术和重建的女性而言,对乳房的满意度是一个关键结局。目前的决策依赖于基于群体的证据,这可能导致对个体的治疗建议不够理想。

方法

我们使用 2011 年至 2016 年期间北美 11 个研究点接受癌症相关乳房切除术和重建的 1921 名女性的数据,训练、测试和验证了 3 种机器学习算法。在手术前和 1 年随访时收集了 1921 名接受癌症相关乳房切除术和重建的女性的数据。11 个研究点中的 10 个随机分为训练和测试样本(2:1 比例),以开发和测试 3 种算法(逻辑回归与弹性网络罚分、极端梯度提升树和神经网络),然后使用其他研究点的数据对其进行验证。使用验证后的 BREAST-Q 预测 1 年随访时对乳房满意度的临床显著变化的 AUC 是结局指标。

结果

当预测测试和验证数据集中的乳房满意度提高或降低时,这 3 种算法的性能相当:对于测试数据集,中位数准确性=0.81(范围 0.73-0.83),中位数 AUC=0.84(范围 0.78-0.85)。对于验证数据集,中位数准确性=0.83(范围 0.81-0.84),中位数 AUC=0.86(范围 0.83-0.89)。

结论

使用机器学习算法可以准确预测个体患者报告结局,从而为接受乳腺癌治疗的女性提供个体化、以患者为中心的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/3f16f7c5d3b5/sla-277-e144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/b753acc79f13/sla-277-e144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/534c6400d4a1/sla-277-e144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/038686119dcb/sla-277-e144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/255a83161e7a/sla-277-e144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/3f16f7c5d3b5/sla-277-e144-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/b753acc79f13/sla-277-e144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/534c6400d4a1/sla-277-e144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/038686119dcb/sla-277-e144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/255a83161e7a/sla-277-e144-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87a/9762704/3f16f7c5d3b5/sla-277-e144-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up.朝着乳腺癌手术中的以患者为中心的决策发展:预测 1 年随访时个体患者报告结局的机器学习方法。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e144-e152. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001).机器学习预测接受癌症相关性乳房切除术和乳房重建的女性患者在 2 年随访时的个体报告结局(INSPiRED-001)。
Breast. 2021 Dec;60:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Enhanced Surgical Decision-Making Tools in Breast Cancer: Predicting 2-Year Postoperative Physical, Sexual, and Psychosocial Well-Being following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction (INSPiRED 004).乳腺癌增强手术决策工具:预测乳房切除术和乳房重建后 2 年的术后身体、性和心理社会健康(INSPiRED 004)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7046-7059. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13971-w. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
4
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
5
Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌根治术后患者长期报告的结局。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677.
6
Accuracy of Predictions of Patients With Breast Cancer of Future Well-being After Immediate Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌患者即刻乳房重建后未来健康状况预测的准确性。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 18;153(4):e176112. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6112.
7
Psychosocial well-being at time of diagnosis of breast cancer affects the decision whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction.乳腺癌诊断时的心理社会健康状况会影响是否进行乳房重建的决定。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;46(8):1441-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making.乳房切除术后乳房重建的可及性以及患者对重建决策的看法。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Oct;149(10):1015-21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.548.
9
A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures.一份关于乳腺癌手术满意度的全国性概况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):361-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.即刻乳房重建术后1年患者报告的结局:乳房切除术重建结局联盟研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2499-2506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Recipient Nerve Selection for Breast Neurotization with Abdominal Flaps: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Anterior and Lateral Intercostal Approaches.腹部皮瓣乳房神经化的最佳受区神经选择:肋间前支和外侧支入路的综合Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 3;14(15):5461. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155461.
2
A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making.关于使用患者报告结局测量信息(PROMs)和机器学习来影响基于价值的临床决策的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03083-8.
3
Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.
利用人工智能根据患者报告的结局指标预测患者预后:一项范围综述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 11;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02365-z.
4
Artificial Intelligence and Breast Cancer Management: From Data to the Clinic.人工智能与乳腺癌管理:从数据到临床
Cancer Innov. 2025 Feb 20;4(2):e159. doi: 10.1002/cai2.159. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.机器学习预测接受新辅助全身治疗的乳腺癌患者发生与治疗相关毒性的个体风险
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Dec;8:e2400010. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00010. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
6
Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review.探索健康相关生活质量测量在肿瘤学预测模型中的作用:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):305-323. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03820-y. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
7
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.
8
Artificial intelligence methods available for cancer research.人工智能方法可用于癌症研究。
Front Med. 2024 Oct;18(5):778-797. doi: 10.1007/s11684-024-1085-3. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
9
Effect of Online Clinic on Follow-Up Compliance and Survival Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Cohort Study from Endemic Area.在线诊疗对鼻咽癌随访依从性和生存结局的影响:来自流行地区的真实世界队列研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;12(14):1452. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141452.
10
Balancing Innovation and Patient Care in Breast Cancer: Integrating Hypofractionated Proton Therapy With Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.乳腺癌治疗中创新与患者护理的平衡:将大分割质子治疗与乳房重建结果相结合
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58056. eCollection 2024 Apr.