Suppr超能文献

通过体内中子活化法和胴体分析法对大鼠体内蛋白质测定的比较。

A comparison of body protein determination in rats by in vivo neutron activation and carcass analysis.

作者信息

Preston T, Reeds P J, East B W, Holmes P H

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1985 Mar;68(3):349-55. doi: 10.1042/cs0680349.

Abstract

Total body nitrogen (TBN) was determined in 16 rat carcasses ranging in weight from 55 to 550 g, by non-destructive 14 MeV neutron activation analysis (NAA). The rat carcasses were subsequently analysed for TBN by Kjeldahl digestion, for total body water (TBW) by loss of weight after freeze-drying and for body fat by adiabatic bomb calorimetry after subtraction of protein energy. TBN results by the two methods were in good agreement, the precision by NAA (coefficient of variation = 1.5%) being superior to that by chemical analysis (coefficient of variation = 2.8%). Body fat calculated by difference from a combination of measured TBW and NAA data agreed closely with bomb calorimetry measurements. The use of indirect estimates of TBW to determine fat gave poor results. A group of four growing rats was analysed sequentially by NAA four times in 2 weeks. The maximum total radiation dose received by each animal was less than 50 rem (less than 500 mSv) and no significant differences in growth rate were observed compared with non-irradiated control groups. 14 MeV NAA in vivo can be conducted with sufficient precision to measure 0.14 g TBN changes in growing rats at 2 weeks post-weaning.

摘要

通过非破坏性14兆电子伏特中子活化分析(NAA)测定了16具体重在55至550克之间的大鼠尸体的全身氮(TBN)。随后通过凯氏定氮法分析大鼠尸体的TBN,通过冷冻干燥后的失重分析全身水(TBW),并在减去蛋白质能量后通过绝热弹式量热法分析体脂。两种方法得到的TBN结果吻合良好,NAA的精密度(变异系数=1.5%)优于化学分析(变异系数=2.8%)。通过结合测量的TBW和NAA数据差值计算得到的体脂与弹式量热法测量结果非常接近。使用TBW的间接估计值来确定脂肪得到的结果较差。一组4只生长中的大鼠在2周内通过NAA依次分析了4次。每只动物接受的最大总辐射剂量小于50雷姆(小于500毫希沃特),与未辐照的对照组相比,未观察到生长速率有显著差异。断奶后2周,体内14兆电子伏特NAA能够以足够的精密度测量生长中大鼠0.14克TBN的变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验