Ghasemiardekani Maryam, Plummer Virginia, Lam Louisa, Banik Biswajit, Cross Wendy
School of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Victoria, Australia.
Federation University Australia, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 13;7:100267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100267. eCollection 2024 Dec.
To identify and synthesize the primary evidence on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on and cardiovascular disease and diseases that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
An integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl method (2005).
Eleven articles met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. The integration of evidence was abundant in three themes 1) Physical activity 2) Weight and Body Mass Index, and 3) Food consumption and each theme having the same six sub-themes of self-efficacy, response-efficacy, response cost, severity, vulnerability and reward. No studies have addressed all clinical factors and behavioral changes associated with cardiovascular disease.
Due to the limited literature on the effectiveness of Protection Motivation Theory on behavioral changes in patients with cardiovascular diseases, generalizations and practice recommendations are limited. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of this theory in patient outcomes.
识别并综合关于保护动机理论对心血管疾病及作为心血管疾病危险因素的疾病有效性的主要证据。
采用惠特莫尔和克纳夫方法(2005年)进行综合评价。
11篇文章符合纳入和质量评估标准。证据整合在三个主题中较为丰富:1)身体活动;2)体重和体重指数;3)食物消费,且每个主题都有相同的六个子主题,即自我效能、反应效能、反应成本、严重性、易感性和奖励。尚无研究涉及与心血管疾病相关的所有临床因素和行为变化。
由于关于保护动机理论对心血管疾病患者行为改变有效性的文献有限,概括和实践建议也受到限制。需要进一步研究以评估该理论在患者预后方面的有效性。