• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-Term Effects of Neurofeedback and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Traumatic Brain Injury: A Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-Based Secondary Analysis.神经反馈和高压氧治疗对创伤性脑损伤的长期影响:基于主成分分析(PCA)的二次分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11):e74305. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74305. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Longitudinal Outcomes of Neurofeedback and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Treating a Traumatic Brain Injury Patient: A Case Report.神经反馈和高压氧治疗创伤性脑损伤患者的纵向结果:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 19;16(7):e64918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64918. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Evaluating the Impact of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Neurofeedback on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report.评估高压氧治疗和神经反馈对轻度创伤性脑损伤的影响:一例报告。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 10;17(1):e77228. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77228. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury.高压氧疗法辅助治疗创伤性脑损伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD004609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004609.pub3.
6
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Psychometric and Nonparametric Analysis of a Retrospective Case Series.高压氧疗法治疗小儿重度创伤性脑损伤:回顾性病例系列的二次心理测量与非参数分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 27;17(2):e79777. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79777. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
Impacts of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) on Verbal Scores in Children With Autism: A Secondary Analysis of the HBOT Trial Using Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA).高压氧疗法(HBOT)对自闭症儿童语言评分的影响:使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)对HBOT试验进行的二次分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 14;16(9):e69421. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69421. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Outcomes of Neurofeedback and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Treating a Traumatic Brain Injury Patient: A Case Report.神经反馈和高压氧治疗创伤性脑损伤患者的纵向结果:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 19;16(7):e64918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64918. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery.神经康复进展:创伤性脑损伤恢复的策略与结果
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62242. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62242. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Adaptive Neuroplasticity in Brain Injury Recovery: Strategies and Insights.脑损伤恢复中的适应性神经可塑性:策略与见解
Cureus. 2023 Sep 24;15(9):e45873. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45873. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Innovative Approaches and Therapies to Enhance Neuroplasticity and Promote Recovery in Patients With Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.增强神经可塑性及促进神经系统疾病患者康复的创新方法与疗法:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):e41914. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41914. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Effects of Neurofeedback on Cognitive Function, Productive Activity, and Quality of Life in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.神经反馈对创伤性脑损伤患者认知功能、生产性活动和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 May;37(5):277-287. doi: 10.1177/15459683231170539. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Impact of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Patient-Reported Outcome Trajectories after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).社会人口学、病前及损伤相关因素对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后患者报告结局轨迹的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 14;12(6):2246. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062246.
7
EEG-Neurofeedback as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for Cognitive Deficits in Patients with Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury.脑电图神经反馈作为痴呆症、多发性硬化症、中风和创伤性脑损伤患者认知缺陷的一种潜在治疗方法。
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;13(2):365. doi: 10.3390/life13020365.
8
Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:预防、临床护理和研究方面的进展和挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Systematic Review and Dosage Analysis: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Efficacy in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Persistent Postconcussion Syndrome.系统评价与剂量分析:高压氧治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤持续性脑震荡后综合征的疗效
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 17;13:815056. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.815056. eCollection 2022.
10
Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Combining Neurofeedback and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in a Single Case Study.治疗重度创伤性脑损伤:单病例研究中神经反馈与高压氧治疗相结合
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022 Nov;53(6):519-531. doi: 10.1177/15500594211068255. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

神经反馈和高压氧治疗对创伤性脑损伤的长期影响:基于主成分分析(PCA)的二次分析

Long-Term Effects of Neurofeedback and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Traumatic Brain Injury: A Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-Based Secondary Analysis.

作者信息

Peterson Tami, AbouAssaly JeAnnah, Burgin Sheila, Sherwin Robert, Strale Frederick

机构信息

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, The Oxford Center, Brighton, USA.

Neurofeedback, The Oxford Center, Brighton, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11):e74305. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74305. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.74305
PMID:39717339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11666294/
Abstract

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses significant public health challenges, but treatments like neurofeedback and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) show promise in aiding recovery. Neurofeedback enhances brain healing through operant conditioning, while HBOT increases cerebral oxygenation, supporting cognitive recovery. A 33-year-old woman, after suffering a severe TBI in 2018 and a long rehabilitation, began HBOT and neurofeedback in late 2021. By early 2022, she demonstrated significant cognitive, emotional, and social improvements. After numerous sessions, a June 2024 quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) revealed substantial brain recovery, with marked gains (Peterson et al.'s initial study) in daily functioning and specific tasks. This secondary analysis conducted in November 2024 used principal component analysis (PCA) on the initial pretest, posttest, and difference score data from the treatment period to explore the neurophysiological effects of the combined therapies. The results showed notable factor structure differences in brainwave patterns and electrode activity from the pretest to the posttest. The simpler structure observed in pretests evolved into a more complex factor structure with posttest and difference scores, indicating neurophysiological adaptations due to the interventions. This study's PCA findings align with the post-treatment qEEG statistical results conducted in June 2024 (Peterson et al.'s initial study), which identified moderate to large improvement effect sizes in the patient's brain's average frequency band parameters (g = 0.612) and small to moderate effect sizes on 19 electrode placement outcomes (uV² g = 0.339 and Hz g = 0.333). The June 2024 results indicated significant progress over a 31-month treatment period. In June 2024, the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) showed substantial improvements in cognitive abilities such as feeding, toileting, grooming, and communication skills. According to the qEEG effect sizes, as well as DRS and GOSE scores from the pretest (2021) and posttest (2024), the patient demonstrated meaningful gains in brain recovery and overall quality of life. The cognitive improvements identified in the June 2024 Wilcoxon test were further corroborated by the factor structure analysis conducted in the November 2024 PCA. This alignment between the Wilcoxon test results and the PCA findings underscores the robustness of the observed cognitive gains, providing a comprehensive validation of the patient's progress. The consistency across these distinct analytical methods highlights the significant strides made in cognitive function, reinforcing the efficacy of the treatment regimen over the observed period.

摘要

重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)给公共卫生带来了重大挑战,但诸如神经反馈和高压氧疗法(HBOT)等治疗方法在促进康复方面显示出了前景。神经反馈通过操作性条件反射增强大脑愈合,而HBOT则增加大脑氧合,支持认知恢复。一名33岁女性在2018年遭受重度TBI并经过长期康复后,于2021年末开始接受HBOT和神经反馈治疗。到2022年初,她在认知、情感和社交方面有了显著改善。经过多次治疗后,2024年6月的定量脑电图(qEEG)显示大脑有了实质性恢复,在日常功能和特定任务方面有了显著进展(彼得森等人的初步研究)。这项于2024年11月进行的二次分析对治疗期间的初始预测试、后测试和差异分数数据进行主成分分析(PCA),以探索联合疗法的神经生理效应。结果显示,从预测试到后测试,脑电波模式和电极活动在因子结构上有显著差异。预测试中观察到的较简单结构在后测试和差异分数时演变成了更复杂的因子结构,表明干预导致了神经生理适应。本研究的PCA结果与2024年6月进行的治疗后qEEG统计结果(彼得森等人的初步研究)一致,该结果确定患者大脑平均频段参数有中度至较大改善效应大小(g = 0.612),在19个电极放置结果上有小至中度效应大小(uV² g = 0.339和Hz g = 0.333)。2024年6月的结果表明在31个月的治疗期内取得了显著进展。2024年6月,残疾评定量表(DRS)和扩展格拉斯哥预后量表(GOSE)显示在进食、如厕、梳洗和沟通技能等认知能力方面有了实质性改善。根据qEEG效应大小以及预测试(2021年)和后测试(2024年)的DRS和GOSE分数,患者在大脑恢复和整体生活质量方面有了有意义的进展。2024年6月威尔科克森测试中确定的认知改善在2024年11月PCA进行的因子结构分析中得到了进一步证实。威尔科克森测试结果与PCA结果之间的这种一致性强调了所观察到的认知进展的稳健性,为患者的进展提供了全面验证。这些不同分析方法之间的一致性突出了认知功能方面取得的重大进展,强化了观察期内治疗方案的疗效。