Suppr超能文献

评估用于纳入感染诊断算法的Vitros®抗克氏锥虫检测法。

Evaluation of the Vitros® Anti-T. cruzi assay for its incorporation into the infection diagnostic algorithm.

作者信息

Campos-Ruiz Miriam, Wang-Wang Jun Hao, Rivaya Belén, Rodriguez-Ponga Beatriz, López Noelia, González Victoria, Cardona Pere-Joan, Fernández-Rivas Gema

机构信息

Microbiology Department, Clinical Laboratory North Metropolitan Area, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, 08916 Badalona, Spain.

Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08916 Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Nov 28;10(23):e40673. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40673. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Serological screening for Chagas disease (CD) in Latin American adults living in Europe is a cost-effective strategy for transmission prevention. The World Health Organization recommends two different serological tests including native and recombinant antigens for IgG detection. In Spain, most commercialized native tests require manual processing. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the automated Vitros® Anti-T. cruzi native antigen-based test.

METHODS

A total of 556 serum samples were tested using two different tests: 1) our reference assay, a chemiluminescence immunoassay employing a recombinant multi-antigen protein (Liaison® XL Murex Chagas); 2) a chemiluminescence immunoassay with native antigen (Vitros® Anti-T. cruzi assay). Additionally, 180 samples were also processed by a manual indirect immunofluorescent assay (Chagas IFA). Sensibility, specificity and kappa index were calculated.

RESULTS

Vitros® showed a kappa index of 0.94 (IC 95 %: 0.86-1.03) compared to Liaison® XL with a sensitivity of 93.6 % and specificity of 99.5 %. Compared to IFA, Vitros® showed a kappa index of 0.61 (IC 95 %: 0.47-0.76), sensitivity of 97.5 % and specificity of 70.37 %. Discrepant results were obtained mainly in treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Vitros® Anti-T. cruzi assay showed potential for implementation as an automated serological screening test, enhancing the diagnostic process in high-throughput microbiology laboratories.

摘要

背景与目的

对居住在欧洲的拉丁美洲成年人进行恰加斯病(CD)血清学筛查是预防传播的一种具有成本效益的策略。世界卫生组织推荐了两种不同的血清学检测方法,包括用于检测IgG的天然抗原和重组抗原检测。在西班牙,大多数商业化的天然抗原检测需要手工操作。我们旨在评估基于抗克氏锥虫天然抗原的自动化维特罗斯(Vitros®)检测的敏感性和特异性。

方法

使用两种不同的检测方法对总共556份血清样本进行检测:(1)我们的参考检测方法,即采用重组多抗原蛋白的化学发光免疫分析(利昂XL美罗恰加斯检测法);(2)采用天然抗原的化学发光免疫分析(维特罗斯抗克氏锥虫检测法)。此外,180份样本还通过手工间接免疫荧光检测法(恰加斯免疫荧光检测法)进行处理。计算敏感性、特异性和kappa指数。

结果

与利昂XL相比,维特罗斯检测法的kappa指数为0.94(95%置信区间:0.86 - 1.03),敏感性为93.6%,特异性为99.5%。与免疫荧光检测法相比,维特罗斯检测法的kappa指数为0.61(95%置信区间:0.47 - 0.76),敏感性为97.5%且特异性为70.37%。不一致的结果主要出现在接受治疗的患者中。

结论

维特罗斯抗克氏锥虫检测法显示出作为自动化血清学筛查检测方法实施的潜力,可改善高通量微生物实验室的诊断流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85ab/11664266/fc500c49041f/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验