Hussain Basharat, Wheat Hannah, Oh Tomasina M, Byng Richard
Community and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70133. doi: 10.1111/hex.70133.
In this viewpoint we highlight a gap in the literature relating to the involvement of professional stakeholders in healthcare evaluation research.
Using the Dementia-PersonAlised Care Team (D-PACT) project as an example, we illustrate how professional stakeholder work can serve various functions, from understanding commissioning and policy context to contributing to detail of intervention components.
We argue that identifying these project-specific functions can help researchers to effectively plan when, how and for whom they will engage in professional stakeholder work across the course of an evaluation. In addition, we call for further evidence-based guidance and sufficient allocation of resources (provided by those funding research projects) to support effective stakeholder work.
Such support will not only enhance evaluation findings but also promote continued learning on best practice for professional stakeholder work.
Public and patient involvement contributors were involved in the main D-PACT study design, development of data collection tools and interpretation of study findings.
在本观点文章中,我们强调了专业利益相关者参与医疗保健评估研究方面文献的一个空白。
以痴呆症个性化护理团队(D-PACT)项目为例,我们阐述了专业利益相关者的工作如何能发挥多种作用,从理解委托和政策背景到为干预组成部分的细节提供帮助。
我们认为,识别这些特定项目的作用有助于研究人员有效地规划在评估过程中何时、如何以及为谁开展专业利益相关者工作。此外,我们呼吁提供更多基于证据的指导以及(由资助研究项目的机构)充分分配资源,以支持有效的利益相关者工作。
这种支持不仅会增强评估结果,还会促进对专业利益相关者工作最佳实践的持续学习。
公众和患者参与贡献者参与了主要的D-PACT研究设计、数据收集工具的开发以及研究结果的解读。