Suppr超能文献

抗病毒药物和单克隆抗体治疗感染奥密克戎变异株的COVID-19患者的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative Effectiveness of Antivirals and Monoclonal Antibodies for Treating COVID-19 Patients Infected With Omicron Variant: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lau Kristy T K, Xiong Xi, Wong Carlos K H, Au Ivan C H, Lui Angel Y C, Tsai Gavin Y T, Wu Tingting, Li Lanlan, Lau Eric H Y, Cowling Benjamin J, Leung Gabriel M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Dec;18(12):e70065. doi: 10.1111/irv.70065.

Abstract

Antiviral drugs likely remain effective against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, while monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have experienced drops in neutralizing ability. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to estimate the comparative effectiveness of antivirals and mAb therapies for treating COVID-19 patients infected with Omicron, capturing primarily acute outcomes. We searched multiple databases from July 4 to July 19, 2022, with updates through November 4, 2022. Studies comparing the effectiveness of antivirals or mAb to either nonuser controls or other treatments were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Data extraction and verification involved five independent researchers. Among 39 studies (727,893 individuals with COVID-19, including 38 nonrandomized trials), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab were associated with lower risks of mortality (HR = 0.317, 95% credible intervals [CrI] = 0.144-0.678; HR = 0.176, 95%CrI = 0.052-0.527) and hospitalization (HR = 0.479, 95%CrI = 0.319-0.711; HR = 0.489, 95%CrI = 0.293-0.797) compared with nonuser controls. Remdesivir users were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization (HR = 0.367, 95%CrI = 0.147-0.868) but not mortality. Molnupiravir and bebtelovimab showed no significant benefits for these outcomes. In conclusion, among individuals infected with COVID-19 during the Omicron wave, mortality risk was lower with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or sotrovimab use, whereas hospitalization was reduced with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, or sotrovimab. Sotrovimab and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were effective against Omicron B.1.1.529/BA.1 and BA.2/BA.4/BA.5 subvariants, respectively. A key limitation is that findings rely on data from the last search and may be impacted by potential changes in mortality risk due to immune evasion by emerging variants, highlighting the need for ongoing randomized trials across variants and populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022351508.

摘要

抗病毒药物可能对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎变异株仍然有效,而单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法的中和能力有所下降。本系统评价和网状Meta分析旨在评估抗病毒药物和mAb疗法治疗感染奥密克戎的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的相对疗效,主要关注急性结局。我们在2022年7月4日至7月19日检索了多个数据库,并于2022年11月4日进行了更新。纳入了比较抗病毒药物或mAb与未使用者对照或其他治疗效果的研究。使用Cochrane RoB 2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。数据提取和核查由五名独立研究人员进行。在39项研究(727,893例COVID-19患者,包括38项非随机试验)中,与未使用者对照相比,奈玛特韦/利托那韦和索托维单抗与较低的死亡风险(风险比[HR]=0.317,95%可信区间[CrI]=0.144-0.678;HR=0.176,95%CrI=0.052-0.527)和住院风险(HR=0.479,95%CrI=0.319-0.711;HR=0.489,95%CrI=0.293-0.797)相关。使用瑞德西韦的患者住院风险较低(HR=0.367,95%CrI=0.147-0.868),但死亡风险未降低。莫努匹拉韦和贝博特洛维单抗在这些结局方面未显示出显著益处。总之,在奥密克戎流行期间感染COVID-19的个体中,使用奈玛特韦/利托那韦或索托维单抗可降低死亡风险,而使用奈玛特韦/利托那韦、瑞德西韦或索托维单抗可降低住院风险。索托维单抗和奈玛特韦/利托那韦分别对奥密克戎B.1.1.529/BA.1和BA.2/BA.4/BA.5亚变异株有效。一个关键限制是,研究结果依赖于上次检索的数据,可能会受到新出现变异株免疫逃逸导致的死亡风险潜在变化的影响,这突出了对不同变异株和人群进行持续随机试验的必要性。试验注册:该研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42022351508。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413c/11669747/1b2842154350/IRV-18-e70065-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验