Pokrywka Andrzej, Sitkowski Dariusz, Surała Olga, Gheddar Laurie, Kintz Pascal
Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Dec 11;6:1480373. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1480373. eCollection 2024.
The presence of a doping substance in an athlete's biological sample may not be only related to intentional pharmacological support. The unintended use of a prohibited substance may be due various reasons. This paper describes the case of a Polish canoeist preparing for the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris who presented a positive doping test result, as a consequence of administering medication to her injured dog. The athlete used a Trofodermin cutaneous spray (containing clostebol acetate) for pet treatment, which resulted in human transfer during close contact and subsequent detection by doping authorities. To bolster the athlete's defense, it was essential to substantiate the scenario of an unconscious violation of anti-doping rules with scientific evidence. Hence, the decision was made to analyze and compare samples of the athlete's hair and her dog's fur. This investigation confirmed that clostebol absorption occurred through the skin of the hands, transfer during sleeping with the dog on the same bedding and/or inhalation (during the application of the medication, which was dispensed to the animal's paws). This defense was accepted by the Court of Arbitration for the Sport Anti-Doping Division, which subsequently found that the athlete committed an anti-doping rule violation, but under circumstances that amounted to a "no fault" scenario.
运动员生物样本中出现禁用物质可能并非仅与故意的药物支持有关。禁用物质的意外使用可能有多种原因。本文描述了一名为备战2024年巴黎夏季奥运会的波兰皮划艇运动员的案例,她的兴奋剂检测呈阳性,原因是给受伤的狗用药。该运动员使用了含有醋酸氯睾酮的特罗福德明皮肤喷雾来治疗宠物,在密切接触过程中导致了药物转移至人体,随后被反兴奋剂机构检测到。为了加强运动员的辩护,必须用科学证据证实无意识违反反兴奋剂规则的情况。因此,决定对运动员的头发样本和她的狗的毛发进行分析和比较。这项调查证实,醋酸氯睾酮是通过手部皮肤吸收的,在与狗同睡在同一张床上时发生了转移和/或在给动物爪子用药时通过吸入进入人体。这一辩护被体育仲裁法庭反兴奋剂部门接受,该部门随后认定该运动员违反了反兴奋剂规则,但属于“无过错”情形。