• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Experience of conductive hearing loss and impacts of hearing aid use throughout life.传导性听力损失的经历及终生使用助听器的影响。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Dec 11;5:1491473. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1491473. eCollection 2024.
2
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.用于单侧耳聋及传导性或混合性听力损失的植入式设备:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020.
3
Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the lived experience of hearing loss and patient reported experience in the UK: the HeLP study.一项探索英国听力损失患者生活体验和患者报告体验的定性研究方案:HeLP 研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e069363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069363.
4
Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids Enable and Empower Self-Management of Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Interview Study Underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel.智能手机连接的助听器促进并增强听力损失的自我管理:一项基于行为改变轮的定性访谈研究
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):921-932. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001143.
5
Lived experiences: Growing up with a seriously mentally ill parent.生活经历:与患有严重精神疾病的父母一起成长。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2024 May;56(3):357-370. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12955. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
7
Parents' experiences of remote microphone systems for children with hearing loss.家长对用于听力损失儿童的远程麦克风系统的体验。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):831-840. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2128443. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
8
Community Perspectives on Hearing Loss in Rural Alaska.农村阿拉斯加地区听力损失的社区观点。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1078-1087. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001348. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
9
The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.耳聋的(不可见性):身份、污名、生活质量和完全可植入人工耳蜗的潜在作用。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14060. doi: 10.1111/hex.14060.
10
What Are Parents' Experiences With Their Child's Hearing Aid Use in the First 5 Years?家长在孩子使用助听器的前 5 年中有哪些体验?
Ear Hear. 2023;44(4):816-828. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001332. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.耳聋的(不可见性):身份、污名、生活质量和完全可植入人工耳蜗的潜在作用。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14060. doi: 10.1111/hex.14060.
2
To tell or not to tell? Exploring the social process of stigma for adults with hearing loss and their families: introduction to the special issue.告知还是不告知?探索成年听力损失者及其家庭的耻辱感社会过程:特刊引言
Int J Audiol. 2023 Dec 28:1-11. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2293651.
3
Cultural competence in NHS hearing aid clinics: a mixed-methods case study of services for Deaf British sign language users in the UK.NHS 助听器诊所的文化能力:英国为聋人英国手语使用者提供服务的混合方法案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):1440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10339-4.
4
Factors Impacting the Use or Rejection of Hearing Aids-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.影响助听器使用或弃用的因素——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 13;12(12):4030. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124030.
5
Exploring the relationship between planned behavior and self-determination theory on health-seeking behavior among older adults with hearing impairment.探索计划行为理论与自我决定理论在听力受损老年人求医行为上的关系。
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Jul-Aug;52:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 13.
6
Technology challenges among deaf and hard of hearing elders in China during COVID-19 pandemic emergency isolation: A qualitative study.中国 COVID-19 疫情紧急隔离期间聋人和重听老年人面临的技术挑战:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;10:1017946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1017946. eCollection 2022.
7
A qualitative investigation of the hearing and hearing-aid related emotional states experienced by adults with hearing loss.成人听力损失患者的听力和助听器相关情绪状态的定性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Oct;62(10):973-982. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2111373. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
8
Prevalence of Tympanic Membrane Perforations Among Adolescents, Adults, and Older Adults in the United States.美国青少年、成年和老年人群中鼓膜穿孔的患病率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):356-358. doi: 10.1177/01945998211062153. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
Assistive Hearing Technology for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Spoken Language Learners.面向失聪及听力障碍口语学习者的辅助听力技术
Educ Sci (Basel). 2019 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.3390/educsci9020153. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Development of a public audiology service in Southern Malawi: profile of patients across two years.马拉维南部公共听力学服务的发展:两年间患者概况。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Oct;60(10):789-796. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1864486. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

传导性听力损失的经历及终生使用助听器的影响。

Experience of conductive hearing loss and impacts of hearing aid use throughout life.

作者信息

Hampton Thomas, Loureiro Manuel, Mortimer Kevin, Nyirenda Deborah

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Dec 11;5:1491473. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1491473. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1491473
PMID:39723158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11668742/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hearing loss and Deafness/deafness affects as much as 5% of the world's population and has a considerable health and economic burden. We explored the relationship with hearing and hearing aids as well as other assistive technology for health in general with a cohort of UK adults who have conductive hearing loss. We anticipated that insights could lead to greater understanding for the delivery of assistive technology (AT) for conductive hearing loss and the participant's lived experience related to technology and society.

METHODS

This study presents the qualitative findings from a mixed methods study exploring the story of each participant's hearing, the impact on their lives and their experience and use of AT. A purposive sample of 33 adults with conductive hearing loss took part in semi-structured interviews. Participants were aged ≥18 years and had previously attended outpatient ENT or audiology clinic at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust. Transcripts underwent thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The overarching theme was "A changing relationship over time with deafness, themselves and society". The three principle sub-themes of the interviews were "a technological world" describing the necessity of interaction with people & technology' both as children and adults, then the concept of "Normalised Marginalisation"-the struggle of childhood and school in the face of social norms' and typicality. Finally, there were issues raised about visibility and "the visible display of D/deafness", tied to aesthetics, vanity and traditional ideas about masculinity. Many participants described their adoption of new technology or devices as "" and their quality of life without assistive technology as significantly impaired.

CONCLUSION

Insights from this study described the experiences of adults with conductive hearing loss and the ways in which they have a difficult relationship with their deafness, including how they felt and viewed themselves and how they interacted with society, particularly as children and young adults. The potential for benefit of assistive technology for hearing health was deemed by many participants to be a necessary bridge integrating them in relationships with other people in society. Early notions of disability, typicality and social norms frequently persisted into adulthood and these insights should be considered by all those professional seeking to provided hearing health assistance to individuals with conductive hearing loss.

摘要

引言

听力损失及失聪影响着全球多达5%的人口,带来了相当大的健康和经济负担。我们对一群患有传导性听力损失的英国成年人进行了研究,探讨了听力与助听器以及其他辅助技术对整体健康的关系。我们预计,这些见解能增进对传导性听力损失辅助技术(AT)的提供以及参与者与技术和社会相关生活经历的理解。

方法

本研究展示了一项混合方法研究的定性结果,该研究探索了每位参与者的听力情况、听力对其生活的影响以及他们对辅助技术的体验和使用。33名患有传导性听力损失的成年人组成的目的样本参与了半结构化访谈。参与者年龄≥18岁,且此前曾在苏塞克斯大学医院国民保健服务信托基金的耳鼻喉科或听力学门诊就诊。访谈记录进行了主题分析。

结果

总体主题是“随着时间推移,与失聪、自身及社会的关系不断变化”。访谈的三个主要子主题分别是“技术世界”,描述了儿童和成年人与人和技术互动的必要性;“常态化边缘化”概念,即儿童和学校在面对社会规范和典型性时的挣扎;最后是关于可见性以及“失聪的可见表现”的问题,这与美学、虚荣心和关于男子气概的传统观念相关。许多参与者将他们采用新技术或设备描述为“……”,并表示没有辅助技术时他们的生活质量会显著受损。

结论

本研究的见解描述了患有传导性听力损失的成年人的经历,以及他们与失聪存在艰难关系的方式,包括他们的感受和自我认知,以及他们与社会的互动方式,尤其是在儿童和青年时期。许多参与者认为辅助技术对听力健康有益,是将他们融入与社会中其他人关系的必要桥梁。早期的残疾、典型性和社会规范观念常常持续到成年,所有寻求为传导性听力损失患者提供听力健康援助的专业人员都应考虑这些见解。