Chakravarthula Puneeth N, Soni Ansh K, Eckstein Miguel P
Department of Psychological and Brain Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Vis. 2024 Dec 2;24(13):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.13.15.
Humans consistently land their first saccade to a face at a preferred fixation location (PFL). Humans also typically process faces as wholes, as evidenced by perceptual effects such as the composite face effect (CFE). However, not known is whether an individual's tendency to process faces as wholes varies with their gaze patterns on the face. Here, we investigated variation of the CFE with the PFL. We compared the strength of the CFE for two groups of observers who were screened to have their PFLs either higher up, closer to the eyes, or lower on the face, closer to the tip of the nose. During the task, observers maintained their gaze at either their own group's mean PFL or at the other group's mean PFL. We found that the top half of the face elicits a stronger CFE than the bottom half. Further, the strength of the CFE was modulated by the distance of the PFL from the eyes, such that individuals with a PFL closer to the eyes had a stronger CFE than those with a PFL closer to the mouth. Finally, the top-half CFE for both upper-lookers and lower-lookers was abolished when they fixated at a non-preferred location on the face. Our findings show that the CFE relies on internal face representations shaped by the long-term use of a consistent oculomotor strategy to view faces.
人类的首次扫视总是落在面部的一个偏好注视位置(PFL)上。人类通常也会将面部作为一个整体来处理,复合面部效应(CFE)等感知效应就证明了这一点。然而,个体将面部作为一个整体来处理的倾向是否会随着他们在面部上的注视模式而变化,这一点尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了CFE随PFL的变化情况。我们比较了两组观察者的CFE强度,这两组观察者经过筛选,一组的PFL较高,更靠近眼睛,另一组的PFL较低,更靠近鼻尖。在任务过程中,观察者将目光保持在自己组的平均PFL或另一组的平均PFL上。我们发现,面部上半部分引发的CFE比下半部分更强。此外,CFE的强度受到PFL与眼睛距离的调节,即PFL更靠近眼睛的个体比PFL更靠近嘴巴的个体具有更强的CFE。最后,当向上注视者和向下注视者注视面部上的非偏好位置时,他们上半部分的CFE都消失了。我们的研究结果表明,CFE依赖于由长期使用一致的眼球运动策略来观察面部所塑造的内部面部表征。