J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2025 Jan;39(1):e70109. doi: 10.1002/jbt.70109.
F. Zhang and H. Luo, "Diosmetin Inhibits the Growth and Invasion of Gastric Cancer by Interfering With M2 Phenotype Macrophage Polarization," Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology 37, no. 10 (2023): e23431, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23431. The above article, published online on 28 June 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Hari K. Bhat; and Wiley Periodicles LLC. A third party notified the publisher that an image in Figure 6 F in this article had been re-used and manipulated from another article by a diferent set of authors (Zhou, et. al. 2022 [https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2036914]). In addition, the third party reported that an image in Figure 3D in this article had been reused from another article by a different set of authors (Cui, et al 2022 [https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2022.2092001]). The authors responded to an inquiry by the publisher and provided what was labelled as original data. However, the data provided did not fully correspond to the images published in the article, and the authors did not provide an explanation for the evidence of image duplications with other articles. The retraction has been agreed to because the evidence of image duplications across different articles, each of which reports on different experimental conditions, fundamentally compromises the conclusions of this article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.
张F和罗H,“香叶木素通过干扰M2型巨噬细胞极化抑制胃癌的生长和侵袭”,《生化与分子毒理学杂志》37卷,第10期(2023年):e23431,https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23431。上述文章于2023年6月28日在线发表于威利在线图书馆(http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/),经期刊主编哈里·K·巴特博士与威利期刊有限责任公司协商后撤回。第三方通知出版商,本文图6F中的一幅图像被重新使用并从另一篇由不同作者组撰写的文章(周等人,2022年[https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2036914])中进行了处理。此外,第三方报告称,本文图3D中的一幅图像被从另一篇由不同作者组撰写的文章(崔等人,2022年[https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2022.2092001])中重新使用。作者回复了出版商的询问并提供了标记为原始数据的内容。然而,所提供的数据与文章中发表的图像并不完全相符,并且作者没有对与其他文章图像重复的证据作出解释。之所以同意撤回,是因为不同文章中图像重复的证据,每篇文章都报道了不同的实验条件,从根本上损害了本文的结论。作者未回复我们关于撤回的通知。