Klotz Susanne G R, Begerow Anke, Girdauskas Evaldas
Department of Physiotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Patient and Care Management, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae218.
A core outcome set (COS) giving indicators of the quality of the process for minimally invasive valve surgery embedded into enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols should be developed.
Using web-based questionnaires, a Delphi process with three rounds was conducted from January to December 2022. Prior to the rounds, a systematic database search was performed identifying potential quality parameters. Experts for the panel were selected reflecting the interprofessional nature of the ERAS protocol. In the first round, participants could make suggestions of indicators in the pre-, intra- or postoperative and rehabilitative phase. These suggestions form together with the indicators of the literature a first indicator list. In the second round, participants could rate the relevance of the indicators resulting in a condensed indicator list. The third round was performed for further condensation based on importance ranking of the remaining indicators.
Three studies could be included in the systematic literature search providing a list of 22 indicators. Twenty-one experts participated in the Delphi survey. The experts named 315 indicators in the first round. After condensation in two further rounds, the final COS consisted of 24 indicators in the categories structure, process, outcome and complications.
A consensual minimum set of quality measurements during pre-, intra- and postoperative and rehabilitation phase for patients with minimally invasive heart surgery is now available for enhancing the quality of clinical practice and facilitating comparisons across different ERAS programs.
应制定一个核心结局集(COS),给出纳入手术后加速康复(ERAS)方案的微创瓣膜手术过程质量指标。
2022年1月至12月,通过基于网络的问卷进行三轮德尔菲法。在各轮之前,进行系统的数据库检索以确定潜在的质量参数。根据ERAS方案的跨专业性质选择专家小组。第一轮,参与者可就术前、术中和术后及康复阶段的指标提出建议。这些建议与文献中的指标共同构成首个指标清单。第二轮,参与者可对指标的相关性进行评分,从而得出精简后的指标清单。第三轮基于剩余指标的重要性排序进行进一步精简。
系统文献检索纳入三项研究,提供了一份包含22项指标的清单。21名专家参与了德尔菲调查。专家在第一轮中提出315项指标。经过两轮进一步精简后,最终的核心结局集由结构、过程、结局和并发症类别中的24项指标组成。
现在有了一个针对微创心脏手术患者术前、术中和术后及康复阶段的共识性最小质量测量集,可用于提高临床实践质量并便于比较不同的ERAS方案。