Strawley Catherine E, Adler-Milstein Julia, Holmgren A Jay, Everson Jordan
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC 20201, United States.
Division of Clinical Informatics & Digital Transformation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Feb 1;32(2):318-327. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae289.
To develop indices of US hospital interoperability to capture the current state and assess progress over time.
A Technical Expert Panel (TEP) informed selection of items from the American Hospital Association Health IT Supplement survey, which were aggregated into interoperability concepts (components) and then further combined into indices. Indices were refined through psychometric analysis and additional TEP input. Final indices included a "Core Index" measuring adoption of foundational interoperability capabilities, a "Pathfinder Index" representing adoption of advanced interoperability technologies and auxiliary exchange activities, and a "Friction Index" quantifying barriers. The first 2 indices were scored from 0 (no interoperability) to 100 (full interoperability); the Friction Index was scored 0 (no friction) to 100 (maximum friction). We calculated indices annually from 2021 to 2023, stratifying by hospital characteristics.
Items within components created reliable and meaningful measures, and associations between components within indices followed the TEP's expectations. Weighted mean scores for the Core (2023), Pathfinder (2022), and Friction (2023) Indices were 61, 57, and 30, respectively. Hospitals with 500+ beds (large), not designated as critical access, in metropolitan areas, and using market leading electronic health records had statistically significant higher mean scores on all indices. Index values also improved modestly over time.
Hospitals performed best on the Core Index. Given recent policy and programmatic initiatives, we anticipate continued improvement across all indices.
Ongoing index tracking can inform policy impact evaluations and highlight persistent interoperability disparities across hospitals.
制定美国医院互操作性指标,以反映当前状况并评估随时间推移的进展。
一个技术专家小组(TEP)为从美国医院协会健康信息技术补充调查中选取项目提供了指导,这些项目被汇总为互操作性概念(组件),然后进一步组合成指标。指标通过心理测量分析和TEP的额外意见进行完善。最终指标包括一个“核心指标”,用于衡量基础互操作性能力的采用情况;一个“探索者指标”,代表先进互操作性技术和辅助交换活动的采用情况;以及一个“摩擦指标”,用于量化障碍。前两个指标的得分范围是0(无互操作性)至100(完全互操作性);摩擦指标的得分范围是0(无摩擦)至100(最大摩擦)。我们在2021年至2023年每年计算指标,并按医院特征进行分层。
组件内的项目产生了可靠且有意义的测量结果,指标内组件之间的关联符合TEP的预期。核心指标(2023年)、探索者指标(2022年)和摩擦指标(2023年)的加权平均得分分别为61、57和30。床位超过500张(大型)、未被指定为急救医院、位于大都市地区且使用市场领先电子健康记录的医院,在所有指标上的平均得分在统计学上显著更高。指标值也随时间略有改善。
医院在核心指标上表现最佳。鉴于近期的政策和计划举措,我们预计所有指标都将持续改善。
持续的指标跟踪可为政策影响评估提供信息,并突出不同医院之间持续存在的互操作性差距。