Polonsky William H, Soriano Emily C, Strycker Lisa A, Fisher Lawrence
Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Dec 26:19322968241308269. doi: 10.1177/19322968241308269.
Recent advances in diabetes care and technology, such as real-time continuous glucose monitoring, can help people live more freely, with more flexibility and fewer constraints, thereby enhancing quality of life (QOL). To date, there has been no validated means for measuring this key psychological dimension. We developed the Diabetes Constraints Scale (DCS) to assess perceived constraints pertaining to diabetes self-management.
Six items were developed from qualitative interviews (20 adults with type 2 diabetes [T2D], 8 adults with type 1 diabetes [T1D]). Items were included in one study with T2D adults (N = 458) and one with T1D adults (N = 574). Scale reliability was analyzed for each study using exploratory factor analyses. Associations between DCS and key psychosocial and glycemic variables were assessed.
In both studies, factor analyses revealed a single factor, with adequate internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha >.80). Both studies demonstrated significant associations in the expected direction between DCS and overall well-being, diabetes-specific QOL, and diabetes distress (all < .001). In both studies, DCS was positively linked with the number of missed insulin boluses and the frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes (T1D both < .001; T2D both < .005) and-in the T1D group only-with HbA ( < .001).
The DCS is a reliable and valid method to determine the degree to which adults with diabetes feel constrained or limited by the disease. It may serve as a useful tool for assessing how new interventions can help individuals feel freer in the face of the demands of diabetes.
糖尿病护理与技术的最新进展,如实吋连续血糖监测,可帮助人们更自由地生活,拥有更多灵活性且限制更少,从而提高生活质量(QOL)。迄今为止,尚无经过验证的方法来衡量这一关键心理维度。我们开发了糖尿病限制量表(DCS),以评估与糖尿病自我管理相关的感知限制。
通过定性访谈(20名2型糖尿病[T2D]成人、8名1型糖尿病[T1D]成人)制定了6个条目。这些条目被纳入一项针对T2D成人的研究(N = 458)和一项针对T1D成人的研究(N = 574)。使用探索性因素分析对每项研究的量表信度进行分析。评估DCS与关键心理社会和血糖变量之间的关联。
在两项研究中,因素分析均揭示了一个单一因素,具有足够的内部信度(Cronbach's alpha>.80)。两项研究均表明,DCS与总体幸福感、糖尿病特异性生活质量和糖尿病困扰之间在预期方向上存在显著关联(均P<.001)。在两项研究中,DCS均与错过的胰岛素推注次数和严重低血糖发作频率呈正相关(T1D两者均P<.001;T2D两者均P<.005),并且仅在T1D组中与糖化血红蛋白呈正相关(P<.001)。
DCS是一种可靠且有效的方法,可确定糖尿病成人感到受疾病限制或约束的程度。它可能是一种有用的工具,用于评估新的干预措施如何帮助个体在面对糖尿病需求时感觉更自由。