Suppr超能文献

我们如何才能判断糖尿病护理与技术的进步是否有助于人们减少受限感呢?介绍糖尿病受限感量表。

How Might We Tell if Advances in Diabetes Care and Technology are Helping People to Feel Less Constrained? Introducing the Diabetes Constraints Scale.

作者信息

Polonsky William H, Soriano Emily C, Strycker Lisa A, Fisher Lawrence

机构信息

Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Dec 26:19322968241308269. doi: 10.1177/19322968241308269.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in diabetes care and technology, such as real-time continuous glucose monitoring, can help people live more freely, with more flexibility and fewer constraints, thereby enhancing quality of life (QOL). To date, there has been no validated means for measuring this key psychological dimension. We developed the Diabetes Constraints Scale (DCS) to assess perceived constraints pertaining to diabetes self-management.

METHODS

Six items were developed from qualitative interviews (20 adults with type 2 diabetes [T2D], 8 adults with type 1 diabetes [T1D]). Items were included in one study with T2D adults (N = 458) and one with T1D adults (N = 574). Scale reliability was analyzed for each study using exploratory factor analyses. Associations between DCS and key psychosocial and glycemic variables were assessed.

RESULTS

In both studies, factor analyses revealed a single factor, with adequate internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha >.80). Both studies demonstrated significant associations in the expected direction between DCS and overall well-being, diabetes-specific QOL, and diabetes distress (all < .001). In both studies, DCS was positively linked with the number of missed insulin boluses and the frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes (T1D both < .001; T2D both < .005) and-in the T1D group only-with HbA ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DCS is a reliable and valid method to determine the degree to which adults with diabetes feel constrained or limited by the disease. It may serve as a useful tool for assessing how new interventions can help individuals feel freer in the face of the demands of diabetes.

摘要

背景

糖尿病护理与技术的最新进展,如实吋连续血糖监测,可帮助人们更自由地生活,拥有更多灵活性且限制更少,从而提高生活质量(QOL)。迄今为止,尚无经过验证的方法来衡量这一关键心理维度。我们开发了糖尿病限制量表(DCS),以评估与糖尿病自我管理相关的感知限制。

方法

通过定性访谈(20名2型糖尿病[T2D]成人、8名1型糖尿病[T1D]成人)制定了6个条目。这些条目被纳入一项针对T2D成人的研究(N = 458)和一项针对T1D成人的研究(N = 574)。使用探索性因素分析对每项研究的量表信度进行分析。评估DCS与关键心理社会和血糖变量之间的关联。

结果

在两项研究中,因素分析均揭示了一个单一因素,具有足够的内部信度(Cronbach's alpha>.80)。两项研究均表明,DCS与总体幸福感、糖尿病特异性生活质量和糖尿病困扰之间在预期方向上存在显著关联(均P<.001)。在两项研究中,DCS均与错过的胰岛素推注次数和严重低血糖发作频率呈正相关(T1D两者均P<.001;T2D两者均P<.005),并且仅在T1D组中与糖化血红蛋白呈正相关(P<.001)。

结论

DCS是一种可靠且有效的方法,可确定糖尿病成人感到受疾病限制或约束的程度。它可能是一种有用的工具,用于评估新的干预措施如何帮助个体在面对糖尿病需求时感觉更自由。

相似文献

3
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;2016(6):CD005542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005542.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
The Hypoglycemic Fear Syndrome: Understanding and Addressing This Common Clinical Problem in Adults With Diabetes.
Clin Diabetes. 2023 Fall;41(4):502-509. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0131. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
4
Effect of diabetes technologies on the fear of hypoglycaemia among people living with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 4;62:102119. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102119. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the emotional side of type 2 diabetes: A re-envisioning of the assessment of diabetes distress.
J Diabetes Complications. 2022 Jan;36(1):108103. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108103. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
7
Quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes after switching to insulin degludec: results from a cross-sectional survey.
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1629-1640. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02753-6. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
9
Psychosocial Aspects of Diabetes Technology: Adult Perspective.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;49(1):143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
10
Assessing the impact of diabetes on quality of life: what have the past 25 years taught us?
Diabet Med. 2020 Mar;37(3):483-492. doi: 10.1111/dme.14196. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验