Suppr超能文献

几种根管锉消毒方法有效性的体外比较研究

A Comparative In-Vitro Study of the Effectiveness of Several Methods of Sterilizing Endodontic Files.

作者信息

AlBaghdadi Moayad, Khaddam Maysam, Zainab Asmahan

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Operative and Endodontics, Tishreen University, Latakia, SYR.

Faculty of health and medical technology, Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Al-Ayen University, Nasiriyah, IRQ.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):e74473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74473. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background Successful endodontic treatment depends on several elements. The most important of which is the elimination of microorganisms within the root canal system. To achieve this, sterility must be maintained during all steps of the treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure the sterility of the tools used in endodontic treatment, whether new or reused. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of several methods for sterilizing endodontic files by evaluating their ability to eliminate a specific type of bacteria. Methods Twenty stainless steel K files were divided into four groups. Files were contaminated with a strain of , and then groups were sterilized using different methods (group A: autoclave; group B: chemical solution; group C: no sterilization; group D: diode laser). After sterilization, files were placed in test tubes containing nutrient broth and then were incubated for 24 hours. After incubation, test tubes were monitored for turbidity, and a sample was taken from each tube to detect bacterial growth on plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar. After 24 hours of incubation, bacterial growth on plates and turbidity in test tubes were registered. Results Bacterial growth was registered on groups C and D plates, while no bacterial growth was registered on groups A and B plates. Turbidity was shown in groups C and D test tubes, while no turbidity was shown in groups A and B test tubes. Conclusions Within the limitation of this study, diode laser was not able to eliminate the bacteria, and thus cannot be used to sterilize endodontic files. The autoclave and the chemical solution were able to eliminate the specified bacteria.

摘要

背景 成功的牙髓治疗取决于多个因素。其中最重要的是消除根管系统内的微生物。要实现这一点,在治疗的所有步骤中都必须保持无菌状态。因此,有必要确保牙髓治疗中使用的工具(无论是新的还是重复使用的)的无菌性。本研究旨在通过评估几种消毒牙髓锉的方法对一种特定类型细菌的消除能力,来评价其有效性。方法 将20根不锈钢K锉分为四组。锉被一种 菌株污染,然后各组采用不同方法进行消毒(A组:高压灭菌;B组:化学溶液;C组:不消毒;D组:二极管激光)。消毒后,将锉放入含有营养肉汤的试管中,然后孵育24小时。孵育后,监测试管的浑浊度,并从每个试管中取样,以检测在含有穆勒-欣顿琼脂的平板上的细菌生长情况。孵育24小时后,记录平板上的细菌生长情况和试管中的浑浊度。结果 C组和D组平板上记录到细菌生长,而A组和B组平板上未记录到细菌生长。C组和D组试管出现浑浊,而A组和B组试管未出现浑浊。结论 在本研究的局限性内,二极管激光无法消除细菌,因此不能用于牙髓锉的消毒。高压灭菌和化学溶液能够消除指定的细菌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c50/11670008/36daa8442ed5/cureus-0016-00000074473-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验