Suppr超能文献

探索沙特阿拉伯医生应对机上医疗紧急情况的本质与挑战:一项横断面调查。

Exploring the Nature and Challenges Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia Responding to an Inflight Medical Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

作者信息

Khalil Hussien Adil, Ali Aljaghwani Saif, Mohammed Albarrak Ibrahim, Rodaini Alanazi Abdullah, Mohammed Althubaiti Marwan, Abdullah Alqahtani Faisal, Abdullah Alharthi Ibrahim, Abdullah Alqahtani Hussain, Saeed Alshalawi Khalid, Faris Alanazi Mohammed

机构信息

Basic Medical Science Department, College of Medicine, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, SAU.

College of Medicine, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 26;16(12):e76420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76420. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background  Inflight medical emergencies (IMEs) present a challenging situation due to the availability of limited medical resources and a complex cabin environment. The physicians have an ethical responsibility to aid in such situations. This study aims to assess the attitudes of Saudi physicians regarding IMEs. Methods  A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical interns and postgraduate physicians in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via a structured online questionnaire distributed through professional networks and social media. The survey evaluated physicians' confidence, preparedness, and barriers to volunteering in an IME.  Results  A total of 368 respondents were included in the study, with a plurality (42.4%, n = 156) in the 30-39 years age group. The proportion of males was 55.2% (n = 203). Among participants, 67.1% (n = 247) had encountered an IME, and 62% (n = 228) had assisted in such a situation. Regarding the nature of IME, 17.9% (n = 66) of the respondents reported respiratory emergency (e.g., bronchospasm). Participants with prior medical emergency experience showed significantly higher scores than those without (54.64 ± 7.81 vs. 49.30 ± 7.10, p < 0.001). Younger physicians (<30 years) displayed the highest confidence scores (54.85 ± 7.03), while those ≥60 years reported the lowest (46.50 ± 4.94, p < 0.01). Physicians with less experience (less than five years) had higher scores compared to their more experienced counterparts (54.69 ± 7.16 vs. 52.25 ± 5.75, p = 0.039). Barriers to volunteering included lack of training (58.6%, n = 215) and legal concerns (61.1%, n = 227), while 67.6% (n = 249) highlighted the need for additional training as a potential motivator.  Conclusion  Overall, the majority of the participants included in our study were willing to aid in an IME. Furthermore, being younger, less experienced, and having prior emergency experience were significant factors in determining the decision to aid in an IME.

摘要

背景 由于医疗资源有限以及机舱环境复杂,飞行中的医疗紧急情况(IME)带来了具有挑战性的局面。医生在这种情况下负有道德责任提供援助。本研究旨在评估沙特医生对飞行中医疗紧急情况的态度。方法 在沙特阿拉伯的医学实习生和研究生医生中进行了一项横断面调查。通过专业网络和社交媒体分发的结构化在线问卷收集数据。该调查评估了医生在飞行中医疗紧急情况中志愿服务的信心、准备情况和障碍。结果 共有368名受访者纳入研究,30 - 39岁年龄组的人数最多(42.4%,n = 156)。男性比例为55.2%(n = 203)。在参与者中,67.1%(n = 247)曾遇到过飞行中医疗紧急情况,62%(n = 228)曾在这种情况下提供过协助。关于飞行中医疗紧急情况的性质,17.9%(n = 66)的受访者报告为呼吸紧急情况(如支气管痉挛)。有过医疗紧急情况经验的参与者得分显著高于没有经验的参与者(54.64 ± 7.81对49.30 ± 7.10,p < 0.001)。年轻医生(<30岁)的信心得分最高(54.85 ± 7.03),而60岁及以上的医生得分最低(46.50 ± 4.94,p < 0.01)。经验较少(少于五年)的医生得分高于经验更丰富的医生(54.69 ± 7.16对52.25 ± 5.75,p = 0.039)。志愿服务的障碍包括缺乏培训(58.6%,n = 215)和法律问题(61.1%,n = 227),而67.6%(n = 249)强调需要额外培训作为潜在的激励因素。结论 总体而言,我们研究中的大多数参与者愿意在飞行中医疗紧急情况中提供援助。此外,年轻、经验较少以及有过紧急情况经验是决定是否在飞行中医疗紧急情况中提供援助的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a86/11670824/393591968ca0/cureus-0016-00000076420-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验