Wu Di, Yao Ye, Cifuentes-Jimenez Carolina Cecilia, Sano Hidehiko, Álvarez-Lloret Pedro, Yamauti Monica, Tomokiyo Atsushi
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan.
Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18011 Granada, Spain.
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Dec 16;15(12):379. doi: 10.3390/jfb15120379.
This study investigated the effects of resin composites (RCs) containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) filler on the dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing universal adhesives (UAs). Water sorption (WS) and solubility (SL), degree of conversion (DC), and ion release were measured. The UAs BeautiBond Xtreme (BBX; 0% HEMA), Modified Adhesive-1 (E-BBX1; 5% HEMA), Modified Adhesive-2 (E-BBX2; 10% HEMA), and two 2-step self-etch adhesives (2-SEAs): FL-BOND II (FBII; with S-PRG filler) and silica-containing adhesive (E-FBII) were used. Teeth were restored with Beautifil Flow Plus F00 with S-PRG filler (BFP) and flowable resin composite with silica filler (E-BFP). μTBS was evaluated after 24 h and 6 months of water storage. WS and SL measurement followed ISO 4049:2019; spectroscopy measured DC; ICP-MS evaluated ion release. BBX and FBII presented the highest DC. The adhesives did not comply with the WS ISO requirements, but the bonding resin of 2-SEAs complied with the SL threshold. BFP released more ions than E-BFP. BFP positively affected the μTBS of UAs, regardless of HEMA concentration after 24 h, comparable to the 2-SEAs. The 6 months μTBS decrease depended on the adhesive and RC combination. HEMA did not affect the μTBS of UAs, while bioactive resins had a positive impact.
本研究调查了含有表面预反应玻璃离子体(S-PRG)填料的树脂复合材料(RCs)对不含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)和含HEMA的通用粘合剂(UAs)牙本质微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。测量了吸水率(WS)和溶解度(SL)、转化率(DC)以及离子释放量。使用了通用粘合剂BeautiBond Xtreme(BBX;0% HEMA)、改良粘合剂-1(E-BBX1;5% HEMA)、改良粘合剂-2(E-BBX2;10% HEMA)以及两种两步自酸蚀粘合剂(two 2-step self-etch adhesives,2-SEAs):FL-BOND II(FBII;含S-PRG填料)和含二氧化硅粘合剂(E-FBII)。用含S-PRG填料的Beautifil Flow Plus F00(BFP)和含二氧化硅填料的流动树脂复合材料(E-BFP)修复牙齿。在水储存24小时和6个月后评估μTBS。WS和SL测量遵循ISO 4049:2019;光谱法测量DC;电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)评估离子释放。BBX和FBII的DC最高。这些粘合剂不符合WS的ISO要求,但2-SEAs的粘结树脂符合SL阈值。BFP比E-BFP释放更多离子。BFP对UAs的μTBS有积极影响,无论24小时后的HEMA浓度如何,与2-SEAs相当。6个月时μTBS的降低取决于粘合剂和RC的组合。HEMA不影响UAs的μTBS,而生物活性树脂有积极影响。