de Queiroz Lucas Tavares, Baptista Barbara de Oliveira, de Abreu-Fernandes Rebecca, Pereira Carolina de Souza Faria, Lemos Juliana Aline de Souza, de Souza Hugo Amorim Dos Santos, Martorano Rodrigo Medeiros, Riccio Evelyn Kety Pratt, Totino Paulo Renato Rivas, Oliveira-Ferreira Joseli, Lima-Junior Josué da Costa, Daniel-Ribeiro Cláudio Tadeu, Pratt-Riccio Lilian Rose
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Centro de Pesquisa, Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária, Fiocruz and Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 27;108(1):544. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13357-2.
Malaria, a parasitic disease caused by Plasmodium spp. and transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes, remains a major global health issue, with an estimated 249 million cases and 608,000 deaths in 2022. Rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for malaria control and elimination. However, limited access to sensitive molecular tests means that microscopic examination and rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are the most used methods in endemic areas, despite their lower diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, there is a need for developing sensitive, simple, accurate, and rapid diagnostic tools suitable for field conditions. Herein, we aimed to explore the potential of the enzymatic recombinase amplification assay (ERA® Technology) as a remote laboratory test by evaluating and validating the GENEYE® ERA Plasmodium detection kit in Brazilian endemic areas. A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted between June and August of 2023 in the Brazilian Amazon. The study enrolled 323 participants residing in three malaria-affected regions: Cruzeiro do Sul and Mâncio Lima (Acre State) and Guajará (Amazonas State). The participants were tested for malaria by microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), nested PCR (nPCR), quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and ERA. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed using nPCR as a gold standard. Plasmodium prevalence was 21.7%, 18.8%, 19.2%, 21.7%, and 21.7% by nPCR, microscopy, RDT, qPCR, and ERA respectively. Using nPCR as the standard, qPCR, and ERA showed a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, microscopy and RDT showed a sensitivity of 87.1% and 88.6%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.56 and 96.93, and kappa values of 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. For Plasmodium falciparum, the sensitivity of qPCR and ERA was 100% while the sensitivity of microscopy and RDT was 96.9% and 93.7%, and the NPV was 99.66 and 99.32, respectively. For Plasmodium vivax, only ERA showed the same sensitivity of nPCR. The sensitivity, NPV, and kappa values were 78.85%, 97.27, and 0.87 for qPCR and microscopy, and 84.21%, 97.94, and 0.9 for RDT. The data presented here show that the GENEYE® ERA Plasmodium detection kit offers a promising alternative to traditional malaria diagnostic methods. Its high sensitivity, specificity, fast processing time, and operational simplicity position it as a valuable point-of-care diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited and remote malaria-endemic areas. KEY POINTS: • GENEYE® ERA kit detects Plasmodium in under 25 min, no DNA purification needed. • The kit matches or exceeds the compared methods in sensitivity and specificity. • The kit is suitable for accurate testing in low-infrastructure, point-of-care settings.
疟疾是一种由疟原虫属寄生虫引起、通过按蚊传播的疾病,仍然是一个重大的全球健康问题,2022年估计有2.49亿病例和60.8万人死亡。快速准确的诊断和治疗对于疟疾的控制和消除至关重要。然而,由于难以获得灵敏的分子检测方法,在疟疾流行地区,显微镜检查和快速诊断检测(RDT)仍是最常用的方法,尽管其诊断准确性较低。因此,需要开发适用于现场条件的灵敏、简单、准确和快速的诊断工具。在此,我们旨在通过在巴西疟疾流行地区评估和验证GENEYE® ERA疟原虫检测试剂盒,探索酶促重组酶扩增检测法(ERA®技术)作为远程实验室检测方法的潜力。2023年6月至8月在巴西亚马逊地区进行了一项横断面队列研究。该研究招募了居住在三个疟疾流行地区的323名参与者:南克鲁塞罗和曼西奥·利马(阿克里州)以及瓜贾拉(亚马孙州)。通过显微镜检查、快速诊断检测(RDT)、巢式聚合酶链反应(nPCR)、定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和ERA对参与者进行疟疾检测。以nPCR作为金标准评估敏感性、特异性和预测值。通过nPCR、显微镜检查、RDT、qPCR和ERA检测到的疟原虫患病率分别为21.7%、18.8%、19.2%、21.7%和21.7%。以nPCR为标准,qPCR和ERA的敏感性为100%。相比之下,显微镜检查和RDT的敏感性分别为87.1%和88.6%,阴性预测值(NPV)分别为96.56和96.93,kappa值分别为0.91和0.92。对于恶性疟原虫,qPCR和ERA的敏感性为100%,而显微镜检查和RDT的敏感性分别为96.9%和93.7%,NPV分别为99.66和99.32。对于间日疟原虫,只有ERA显示出与nPCR相同的敏感性。qPCR和显微镜检查的敏感性、NPV和kappa值分别为78.85%、97.27和0.87,RDT的分别为84.21%、97.94和0.9。此处呈现的数据表明,GENEYE® ERA疟原虫检测试剂盒为传统疟疾诊断方法提供了一种有前景的替代方案。其高敏感性、特异性、快速处理时间和操作简便性使其成为一种有价值的即时诊断工具,特别是在资源有限和偏远的疟疾流行地区。要点:• GENEYE® ERA试剂盒在不到25分钟内检测疟原虫,无需DNA纯化。• 该试剂盒在敏感性和特异性方面与所比较的方法相当或更优。• 该试剂盒适用于在低基础设施的即时诊断环境中进行准确检测。