Suppr超能文献

参与者效应:一项基于社区的研究中的死亡率与生命统计数据的比较

The participant effect: mortality in a community-based study compared to vital statistics.

作者信息

Wing S, Tyroler H A, Manton K G

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(2):135-44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90086-4.

Abstract

The 20-year mortality experience of the community-based Evans County Heart Study population is compared to local, regional and national vital statistics. Deficit mortality occurred in the study population at younger ages while at older ages mortality was similar to or greater than vital statistics. This was particularly true for white and nonwhite males, whose mortality patterns were statistically significantly different from Evans Co. vital statistics (P less than 0.005). Nonwhite/white mortality ratios in the study were close to those observed in local vital statistics, particularly for males. Sex mortality ratios in the study population were lower than in vital statistics due to a stronger participant effect (lower mortality) in males. Evans Co. was an area of particularly high mortality for whites in the period 1960-1980 compared to other parts of Georgia and the U.S. Results of this study are similar to other reports of participant effects in epidemiologic follow-up studies; implications for bias in estimates of population levels of disease and of disease/exposure relationships are discussed.

摘要

将基于社区的伊文斯县心脏研究人群的20年死亡率情况与当地、地区和国家的人口统计数据进行了比较。在研究人群中,较年轻年龄段出现了死亡不足的情况,而在较年长年龄段,死亡率与人口统计数据相似或更高。对于白人男性和非白人男性来说尤其如此,他们的死亡率模式与伊文斯县的人口统计数据在统计学上有显著差异(P小于0.005)。该研究中的非白人/白人死亡率之比与当地人口统计数据中观察到的情况相近,尤其是对于男性。由于男性参与者效应更强(死亡率更低),研究人群中的性别死亡率之比低于人口统计数据中的情况。与佐治亚州其他地区和美国相比,伊文斯县在1960年至1980年期间是白人死亡率特别高的地区。本研究结果与流行病学随访研究中其他关于参与者效应的报告相似;讨论了对疾病人群水平估计以及疾病/暴露关系估计中偏差的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验