Walter Yohan A, Wang Chiachien J, Speir Daniel B, Burrell William E, Palomeque Carlos D, Henry James C, Rodrigues Megan M, Jacobs Troy D, Broekhoven Bethany L, Dugas Joseph P, Hubbard Anne N, Durham Philip F, Wu Hsinshun T
Department of Clinical Research, University of Jamestown, Fargo, North Dakota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2025 May-Jun;15(3):253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Motion management presents a significant challenge in thoracic stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Currently, a 5.0-mm standard planning target volume (PTV) margin is widely used to ensure adequate dose to the tumor. Considering recent advancements in tumor localization and motion management, there is merit to reassessing the necessary PTV margins for modern techniques. This work presents a large-scale analysis of intrafraction repositioning for lung SABR under forced shallow breathing to determine the margin requirements for modern delivery techniques.
Treatment data for 124 lung SABR patients treated in 607 fractions on a linear accelerator were retrospectively collected for analysis. All patients were treated using pneumatic abdominal compression and intrafraction 4-dimensional (4D) cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT)-guided repositioning halfway through treatment. Executed repositioning shifts were collected and used to calculate margin requirements using the 2-SD method and an analytical model which accounts for systematic and random errors in treatment.
A total of 85.7% of treated fractions had 3-dimensional repositioning shifts under 5.0 mm. Fifty-three fractions (8.7%) had shifts ≥ 5.0 mm in at least 1 direction. Margins in the right-left, inferior-superior, and posterior-anterior directions were 3.62 mm, 4.34 mm, and 3.50 mm, respectively, calculated using the 2-SD method. The analytical approach estimated that 4.01 mm, 4.37 mm, and 3.95 mm margins were appropriate for our workflow. Executing intrafraction repositioning reduced margin requirements by 0.73 ± 0.07 mm.
Clinical data suggest that the uniform 5.0-mm margin is conservative for our workflow. Using modern techniques such as 4D CT, 4D CBCT, and effective motion management can significantly reduce required margins, and therefore necessary healthy tissue dose. However, the limitations of margin calculation models must be considered, and margin reduction must be approached with caution. Users should conduct a formal risk assessment prior to adopting new standard PTV margins.
在胸部立体定向消融放疗(SABR)中,运动管理是一项重大挑战。目前,5.0毫米的标准计划靶区(PTV)边界被广泛用于确保肿瘤获得足够剂量。鉴于肿瘤定位和运动管理方面的最新进展,重新评估现代技术所需的PTV边界是有价值的。这项工作对在强制浅呼吸下进行肺部SABR时的分次内重新定位进行了大规模分析,以确定现代放疗技术的边界要求。
回顾性收集了124例肺部SABR患者在直线加速器上接受607次分次治疗的数据进行分析。所有患者均采用气动腹部压迫,并在治疗中途使用分次内四维(4D)锥形束计算机断层扫描(4D CBCT)引导重新定位。收集执行的重新定位位移,并使用2标准差方法和一个考虑治疗中系统误差和随机误差的分析模型来计算边界要求。
总共85.7%的治疗分次在5.0毫米以下有三维重新定位位移。53次分次(8.7%)在至少一个方向上的位移≥5.0毫米。使用2标准差方法计算,左右、上下和前后方向的边界分别为3.62毫米、4.34毫米和3.50毫米。分析方法估计,对于我们的工作流程,4.01毫米、4.37毫米和3.95毫米的边界是合适的。执行分次内重新定位使边界要求降低了0.73±0.07毫米。
临床数据表明,对于我们的工作流程,统一的5.0毫米边界是保守的。使用现代技术(如4D CT、4D CBCT和有效的运动管理)可以显著减少所需边界,从而减少对健康组织的必要剂量。然而,必须考虑边界计算模型的局限性,并且边界减少必须谨慎进行。在采用新的标准PTV边界之前,使用者应进行正式的风险评估。