• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对有关青少年心理健康服务中共同生产的文献进行的快速实证综述。

A rapid realist review of literature examining Co-production in mental health services for youth.

作者信息

Jones Verity Rose, Waring Justin, Wright Nicola, Fenton Sarah-Jane

机构信息

University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.

University of Nottingham Birmingham UK.

出版信息

JCPP Adv. 2024 Aug 21;4(4):e12272. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12272. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12272
PMID:39734930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11669775/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An overview of internationally published literature on what works for co-production in youth mental health services is missing, despite a practice and policy context strongly recommending this approach. This rapid realist review develops a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work, for whom and in which circumstances.

METHODS

Relevant evidence was synthesised to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) that can inform policy and practice. Stakeholders were iteratively involved by engaging an expert panel including young people and a separate youth advisory group. Searches across eight databases and expert panel suggestions identified 5716 documents which were screened at abstract level, 532 at full-text and 57 documents were included in the review.

RESULTS

Data extracted from 57 papers contributed to five CMO configurations to describe the generative mechanisms by which co-production in youth mental health services are linked to outcomes and influenced by context. The final programme theory is: Youth experts by experience (YEBE), particularly those from minoritised communities, provided with a supportive organisational culture can experience authentic engagement where their knowledge is perceived as credible by wider stakeholders. This leads to personal development for participating YEBE as well as service improvements from their input.

CONCLUSIONS

Rich data from a heterogenous sample of papers along with stakeholder consultation enabled this review to refine a clear programme theory for co-production in mental health services for young people. Nevertheless, further information is needed to identify what constitutes a supportive organisational culture and to explore rival theories or under-evidenced areas.

摘要

背景

尽管实践和政策背景强烈推荐这种方法,但目前缺少对国际上已发表的关于青年心理健康服务中共同生产有效方法的文献综述。本快速实证综述提出了一种理论,阐述青年心理健康服务中的共同生产方法如何、为何起作用,对谁起作用以及在何种情况下起作用。

方法

综合相关证据以构建情境 - 机制 - 结果配置(CMO),为政策和实践提供参考。通过组建包括年轻人在内的专家小组和一个单独的青年咨询小组,让利益相关者反复参与进来。在八个数据库中进行检索,并参考专家小组的建议,共识别出5716篇文献,经摘要筛选后有532篇进入全文筛选,最终57篇文献纳入综述。

结果

从57篇论文中提取的数据形成了五个CMO配置,以描述青年心理健康服务中共同生产与结果相联系并受情境影响的生成机制。最终的项目理论是:有生活经验的青年专家(YEBE),特别是来自少数族裔社区的青年专家,在支持性的组织文化中能够获得真实的参与感,其知识能被更广泛的利益相关者视为可信。这会为参与的YEBE带来个人发展,并因他们的投入使服务得到改善。

结论

来自不同论文样本的丰富数据以及利益相关者的咨询,使本综述能够完善针对青年心理健康服务共同生产的清晰项目理论。然而,仍需要进一步信息来确定什么构成支持性的组织文化,并探索对立理论或证据不足的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/9624ab7187ea/JCV2-4-e12272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/c28479feab7e/JCV2-4-e12272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/1389cc391654/JCV2-4-e12272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/9624ab7187ea/JCV2-4-e12272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/c28479feab7e/JCV2-4-e12272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/1389cc391654/JCV2-4-e12272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4b7/11669775/9624ab7187ea/JCV2-4-e12272-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A rapid realist review of literature examining Co-production in mental health services for youth.一项对有关青少年心理健康服务中共同生产的文献进行的快速实证综述。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Aug 21;4(4):e12272. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12272. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
3
Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review.远程心理健康中对谁有效证据的综合:快速实在论综述。
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Sep 29;11(2):e38239. doi: 10.2196/38239.
4
Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.将姑息治疗与心力衰竭相结合:PalliatHeartSynthesis 真实综合。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(34):1-128. doi: 10.3310/FTRG5628.
5
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
6
Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience: (RReHOPE) findings from a realist review.基于新冠疫情经历的英国健康访视:(RReHOPE)一项实在论综述的结果
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-50. doi: 10.3310/MYRT5921.
7
Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: a realist review.用于预防和减少对学习障碍成年人使用限制措施的方法:一项现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(14):1-64. doi: 10.3310/PGAS1755.
8
Why do acute healthcare staff behave unprofessionally towards each other and how can these behaviours be reduced? A realist review.医护人员之间为何会出现不专业的行为,又应如何减少此类行为?一项现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(25):1-195. doi: 10.3310/PAMV3758.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review.护士、助产士和护理人员工作场所心理不健康的原因和解决办法:压力下护理 2 真实审查。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(9):1-171. doi: 10.3310/TWDU4109.

本文引用的文献

1
'Just because we're younger doesn't mean our opinions should be any less valued': A qualitative study of youth perspectives on a Youth Advisory Council in a mental healthcare context.“我们年轻并不意味着我们的意见应该被轻视”:一项关于青年对心理健康服务中青少年咨询委员会看法的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1883-1894. doi: 10.1111/hex.13794. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews.在真实主义评价中应用和报告相关性、丰富性和严谨性:推进真实主义综述的关键概念。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 May;14(3):504-514. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1630. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review.
青年参与精神健康研究:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):30-50. doi: 10.1111/hex.13650. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Participation of Children and Youth in Mental Health Policymaking: A Scoping Review [Part I].儿童和青少年参与精神卫生政策制定:范围综述 [第一部分]。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Jan;50(1):58-83. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01223-0. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Evaluating the strengths and challenges of PAX dream makers approach to mental health promotion: perspectives of youth and community members in indigenous communities in Manitoba, Canada.评估 PAX 梦想制造者在促进精神健康方面的优势和挑战:来自加拿大马尼托巴省土著社区的青年和社区成员的观点。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022 Dec;81(1):2089378. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2089378.
6
Participatory mental health interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol.参与式心理健康干预在中低收入国家的实施效果:一项真实世界研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):e057530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057530.
7
Who is @ease? Visitors' characteristics and working method of professionally supported peer-to-peer youth walk-in centres, anonymous and free of charge.@ease 是谁?专业支持的 peer-to-peer 青少年步行咨询中心(匿名且免费)的来访者特征和工作方式。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;16(12):1391-1397. doi: 10.1111/eip.13294. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
8
Designing and scaling up integrated youth mental health care.设计并扩大综合性青少年心理健康护理服务。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):61-76. doi: 10.1002/wps.20938.
9
Engaging young people within a collaborative knowledge mobilization network: Development and evaluation.参与协作知识转化网络的年轻人:发展与评估。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):617-627. doi: 10.1111/hex.13409. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
10
Youth-led resilience promotion during disaster recovery: A proposed framework, innovative program, and lessons learned.青年主导的灾后恢复韧性提升:一个提议的框架、创新项目及经验教训。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Apr;14(S1):S32-S40. doi: 10.1037/tra0001142. Epub 2021 Nov 29.