Bhattacharyya Parthasarathi, Sen Srijita, Ghosh Shuvam, Dey Debkanya, Sengupta Sayoni, Karmakar Sayanti, Saha Dipanjan, Kar Avishek, Banerjee Rajat
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Pulmocare & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Department of Airway Diseases, Institute of Pulmocare & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Nov;160(5):439-447. doi: 10.25259/ijmr_2404_23.
Background & objectives Spirometric glycopyrronium responsiveness, a new advent, needs to be examined at in terms of degree and frequency in different obstructive-airway diseases diagnosed in real world practise. Methods Serial and willing symptomatic affected individuals of suspected airway disease underwent a pragmatic post-consultation spirometry-protocol on the same day with salbutamol followed by glycopyrronium bromide. The diagnosis of asthma (FEV1-reversibility ≥ 200 ml + 12%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1/FVC<0.7 and FEV1-reversibility <200 ml and/or 12%), and 'unclassified' (neither asthma nor COPD) were determined on post-salbutamol changes. The performances of the two classes of bronchodilators were compared on FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEV1, and FEF-25-75 while the relative frequency of significant responsiveness for salbutamol (≥200 ml) and glycopyrronium (≥100 ml) were noted. Results Fifteen hundred and eighty study participants consisting of asthma (n=329; 21%), COPD (n=641; 40%), and 'unclassified' (n=610; 39%) were included. Both salbutamol and glycopyrronium had demonstrated improvement across the spirometric parameters. The salbutamol responsiveness was statistically significant in all but COPD in terms of absolute values of FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 and the glycopyrronium responsiveness was significant in all plus COPD in FVC, FEV1, and FEF25-75 values. While all the asthmatics, 9.83 per cent of 'unclassified' study participants, and none of the COPD affected individuals had significant FEV1 responsiveness to salbutamol, the glycopyrronium responsiveness for the three conditions were 38.3, 40.25 and 24.26 per cent, respectively. The combined reversibility for asthma, COPD, and unclassified were 401.5±173.9, 119.5±109.3, and 158.7±136.3 ml, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions Spirometry with serial salbutamol and glycopyrronium responsiveness may prove helpful in identifying syndromic diagnosis and choosing the bronchodilator treatment of airway diseases.
作为一项新进展,需要在现实世界实践中诊断出的不同阻塞性气道疾病中,从程度和频率方面对肺量计测定的格隆溴铵反应性进行研究。方法:对疑似气道疾病的有症状且愿意配合的连续个体,在同一天按照实用的会诊后肺量计方案,先使用沙丁胺醇,随后使用格隆溴铵。根据沙丁胺醇使用后的变化确定哮喘(第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]可逆性≥200 ml + 12%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(FEV1/用力肺活量[FVC]<0.7且FEV1可逆性<200 ml和/或12%)以及“未分类”(既不是哮喘也不是COPD)的诊断。比较这两类支气管扩张剂在FVC、FEV1/FVC、FEV1和呼气流量峰值(FEF)-25%-75%方面的表现,同时记录沙丁胺醇(≥200 ml)和格隆溴铵(≥100 ml)显著反应性的相对频率。结果:纳入了1580名研究参与者,其中哮喘患者329名(21%)、COPD患者641名(40%)、“未分类”患者610名(39%)。沙丁胺醇和格隆溴铵在所有肺量计参数方面均显示出改善。就FEV1、FEV1/FVC和FEF25 - 75%的绝对值而言,除COPD外,沙丁胺醇反应性在其他所有疾病中均具有统计学意义;格隆溴铵反应性在FVC、FEV1和FEF25 - 75%值方面,在所有疾病包括COPD中均具有统计学意义。所有哮喘患者、9.83%的“未分类”研究参与者以及没有COPD患者对沙丁胺醇有显著的FEV1反应性,而这三种情况对格隆溴铵的反应性分别为38.3%、40.25%和24.26%。哮喘、COPD和未分类患者的联合可逆性分别为401.5±173.9、119.5±109.3和158.7±136.3 ml。解读与结论:连续使用沙丁胺醇和格隆溴铵进行肺量计测定,可能有助于气道疾病的综合征诊断及选择支气管扩张剂治疗。