Jenkins Holly E, de Graaf Ysanne, Smith Faye, Riches Nick, Wilson Benjamin
Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1497201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497201. eCollection 2024.
Implicit statistical learning is, by definition, learning that occurs without conscious awareness. However, measures that putatively assess implicit statistical learning often require explicit reflection, for example, deciding if a sequence is 'grammatical' or 'ungrammatical'. By contrast, 'processing-based' tasks can measure learning without requiring conscious reflection, by measuring processes that are facilitated by implicit statistical learning. For example, when multiple stimuli consistently co-occur, it is efficient to 'chunk' them into a single cognitive unit, thus reducing working memory demands. Previous research has shown that when sequences of phonemes can be chunked into 'words', participants are better able to recall these sequences than random ones. Here, in two experiments, we investigated whether serial visual recall could be used to effectively measure the learning of a more complex artificial grammar that is designed to emulate the between-word relationships found in language.
We adapted the design of a previous Artificial Grammar Learning (AGL) study to use a visual serial recall task, as well as more traditional reflection-based grammaticality judgement and sequence completion tasks. After exposure to "grammatical" sequences of visual symbols generated by the artificial grammar, the participants were presented with novel testing sequences. After a brief pause, participants were asked to recall the sequence by clicking on the visual symbols on the screen in order.
In both experiments, we found no evidence of artificial grammar learning in the Visual Serial Recall task. However, we did replicate previously reported learning effects in the reflection-based measures.
In light of the success of serial recall tasks in previous experiments, we discuss several methodological factors that influence the extent to which implicit statistical learning can be measured using these tasks.
根据定义,内隐统计学习是在没有意识觉知的情况下发生的学习。然而,那些被认为用于评估内隐统计学习的测量方法通常需要外显的思考,例如,判断一个序列是“符合语法的”还是“不符合语法的”。相比之下,“基于加工的”任务可以通过测量那些因内隐统计学习而得到促进的加工过程,在不需要意识思考的情况下测量学习。例如,当多个刺激持续共同出现时,将它们“组块”成一个单一的认知单元是高效的,从而减少工作记忆的需求。先前的研究表明,当音素序列可以被组块成“单词”时,与随机序列相比,参与者能够更好地回忆这些序列。在此,我们通过两个实验研究了序列视觉回忆是否可以有效地测量一种更复杂的人工语法的学习,这种人工语法旨在模拟语言中单词间的关系。
我们改编了先前一项人工语法学习(AGL)研究的设计,以使用视觉序列回忆任务,以及更传统的基于思考的语法性判断和序列完成任务。在接触由人工语法生成的视觉符号的“符合语法的”序列后,向参与者呈现新颖的测试序列。短暂停顿后,要求参与者按顺序点击屏幕上的视觉符号来回忆序列。
在两个实验中,我们在视觉序列回忆任务中均未发现人工语法学习的证据。然而,我们确实在基于思考的测量中重复了先前报道的学习效应。
鉴于先前实验中序列回忆任务的成功,我们讨论了几个影响使用这些任务测量内隐统计学习程度的方法学因素。