Suppr超能文献

使用带有SwiftScan的碲化镉锌探测器提高短时骨SPECT的图像质量。

Improving the image quality of short-time bone SPECT using cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors with SwiftScan.

作者信息

Funakoshi Kazuto, Yamane Tomohiko, Kozawa Eito, Matsunari Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Molecular Imaging Research, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2025;13(1):87-93. doi: 10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.

METHODS

Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.

RESULTS

The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUV changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.

CONCLUSION

With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUV and CNR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用配备碲化镉锌探测器的半导体相机,评估采用和不采用SwiftScan技术的骨单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的质量及相关定量值。

方法

10例前列腺癌骨转移患者使用全身半导体相机进行列表模式SPECT/计算机断层扫描,参与了本研究。对10例患者的总共130个转移病灶进行了分析。大约3小时后获取标准SPECT图像,并在有和没有SwiftScan技术的情况下构建图像。

结果

对三维最大强度投影图像的视觉评估显示,当图像质量评分4(良好)或更高被临床认为可接受时,在使用SwiftScan技术的75%和50%扫描中该评分维持在4或更高,而在不使用SwiftScan技术时只有75%的扫描被认为可接受。在不使用SwiftScan技术的标准时间下,组内相关系数在5%时为0.952,使用SwiftScan技术时为0.990。在不使用SwiftScan技术时,最大标准化摄取值(SUV)变化在75%时为0至9.5(中位数1.1),50%时为0.1至11.5(1.65),25%时为0至15.7(2.1),10%时为0.1至33.2(4.2),5%时为0.2至8.9(5.65)。相反,使用SwiftScan技术时,SUV变化的绝对值在75%时为0至5.4(中位数0.8),50%时为0至6.5(1.4),25%时为0至19.1(1.7),10%时为0至24.2(2.8),5%时为0至29.9(2.6)。不使用SwiftScan技术时,对比噪声比(CNR)在75%时为95.3,50%时为88.3,25%时为69.2,10%时为45.7,5%时为31.6,使用SwiftScan技术时分别为96.9、91.7、78.0、71.6和62.0。

结论

使用SwiftScan技术时,采集时间减少50%对于图像质量以及SUV和CNR等可重复定量指标而言被认为是可接受的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01eb/11682469/fed2b7accd71/AOJNMB-13-87-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验