Vartian C, Lerner P I, Shlaes D M, Gopalakrishna K V
Medicine (Baltimore). 1985 Mar;64(2):75-88. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198503000-00001.
The group G streptococcus has surfaced in the past 10 to 15 years as an important opportunistic and nosocomial pathogen. Although more precise organism recognition accounts for a portion of these cases, there can be little doubt that the group G streptococcus has become a more prevalent pathogen. Commercial kits, utilizing staphylococcal coagglutination or latex agglutination, are now available, affording all clinical laboratories the opportunity to identify this organism easily. Published reviews encompassing the experiences of a single institution or even several institutions affiliated with a single medical center, particularly as they were influenced by referral patterns, did not reflect the broad scope of infections that we discovered by extending our survey into the community, beyond the medical center complex and its immediate affiliated hospitals. Although malignancy is the single most obvious background factor, alcoholism and diabetes are also important host determinants of infection. Skin and soft-tissue infections (and surface sources of infection) are equally important among patients with or without the element of malignancy. Polymicrobial infection, including polymicrobial bacteremia, is an important feature, with S. aureus infections accounting for most of these cases, relating to the skin and soft tissue sources of infections so commonly seen. We saw a panorama of problems including endocarditis, septic arthritis, pleuropulmonary infections, bone and joint infections, puerperal sepsis and neonatal infection, peritonitis and ophthalmitis; we also saw a significant number of patients with bacteremia and no apparent primary source of infection. Response to antibiotic therapy was dictated by the nature of the underlying diseases, and individuals without a background of malignant disease did well, particularly those with skin and soft-tissue infections. While the literature suggests that patients with endocarditis and septic arthritis due to this organism respond poorly to antibiotic therapy, implying that such failures relate to in vitro antibiotic phenomena, we preferred to examine the problem from the viewpoint of the host(s) involved. Subacute endocarditis and acute endocarditis due to the group G streptococcus may be clinically separable, and thus require separate therapeutic approaches. In patients with septic arthritis, prosthetic devices, prior joint disease and immunosuppressive diseases and therapy often adversely influence the response to antibiotic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在过去10到15年中,G群链球菌已成为一种重要的机会性和医院病原体。尽管更精确的病原体识别解释了部分此类病例,但毫无疑问,G群链球菌已成为一种更普遍的病原体。现在有利用葡萄球菌协同凝集或乳胶凝集的商业试剂盒,这使所有临床实验室都有机会轻松鉴定这种病原体。已发表的综述涵盖单个机构甚至与单一医疗中心相关的几个机构的经验,特别是受转诊模式影响的经验,但并未反映出我们通过将调查扩展到社区、医疗中心综合设施及其直属附属医院之外所发现的广泛感染范围。尽管恶性肿瘤是最明显的单一背景因素,但酗酒和糖尿病也是感染的重要宿主决定因素。在有或没有恶性肿瘤因素的患者中,皮肤和软组织感染(以及感染的表面来源)同样重要。包括多微生物菌血症在内的多微生物感染是一个重要特征,其中大多数病例为金黄色葡萄球菌感染,这与常见的皮肤和软组织感染源有关。我们看到了一系列问题,包括心内膜炎、化脓性关节炎、胸膜肺部感染、骨和关节感染、产褥期败血症和新生儿感染、腹膜炎和眼炎;我们还看到大量菌血症患者且无明显的原发性感染源。对抗生素治疗的反应取决于潜在疾病的性质,没有恶性疾病背景的个体情况良好,尤其是那些患有皮肤和软组织感染的患者。虽然文献表明,由这种病原体引起的心内膜炎和化脓性关节炎患者对抗生素治疗反应不佳,这意味着此类治疗失败与体外抗生素现象有关,但我们更倾向于从所涉及宿主的角度来审视这个问题。由G群链球菌引起的亚急性心内膜炎和急性心内膜炎在临床上可能有所不同,因此需要不同的治疗方法。在化脓性关节炎患者中,假体装置、既往关节疾病以及免疫抑制性疾病和治疗常常会对抗生素治疗的反应产生不利影响。(摘要截取自400字)