• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对布基纳法索政府为营造健康食品环境而实施的政策和行动的评估。

Evaluation of the implementation of governmental policies and actions to create healthy food environments in Burkina Faso.

作者信息

Tapsoba Viviane Aurélie, Compaore Ella Wr, Zeba Augustin Nawidimbasba, Some Jerome Winbetourefa, Manga Julien Soliba, Diouf Adama, Moubarac Jean-Claude, Vandevijvere Stefanie, Dicko Mamoudou H

机构信息

Universite Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 BP 7021, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 2;28(1):e31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002568.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980024002568
PMID:39744843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11822587/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The creation of a healthy food environment is highly dependent on the policies that governments choose to implement. The objective of this study is to compare the level of implementation of current public policies aimed at creating healthy food environments in Burkina Faso with international good practice indicators.

DESIGN

This evaluation was carried out using the Food-EPI tool. The tool has two components (policy and infrastructure support), thirteen domains and fifty-six good practice indicators adapted to the Burkina Faso context.

SETTING

Burkina Faso.

PARTICIPANTS

Expert evaluators divided into two groups: the group of independent experts from universities, NGO and civil society and the group of experts from various government sectors.

RESULTS

Among the fifty-six indicators, it was assessed the level of implementation as 'high' for six indicators, 'medium' for twenty-four indicators, 'low' for twenty-two indicators and 'very low' for four indicators. High implementation level indicators include strong and visible political support, targets on exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding, strong and visible political support for actions to combat all forms of malnutrition, monitoring of exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding indicators, monitoring of promotion and growth surveillance programmes and coordination mechanism (national, state and local government). The indicators on menu labelling, reducing taxes on healthy foods, increasing taxes on unhealthy foods and dietary guidelines are the indicators with a 'very low' level of implementation in Burkina Faso.

CONCLUSIONS

The general results showed that there is a clear need for further improvements in policy and infrastructure support to promote healthy food environments.

摘要

目的

健康食品环境的创建高度依赖于政府选择实施的政策。本研究的目的是将布基纳法索目前旨在创建健康食品环境的公共政策的实施水平与国际良好实践指标进行比较。

设计

本评估使用了食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)工具。该工具包含两个部分(政策和基础设施支持)、13个领域以及56项根据布基纳法索情况调整的良好实践指标。

背景

布基纳法索。

参与者

专家评估人员分为两组:来自大学、非政府组织和民间社会的独立专家小组以及来自政府各部门的专家小组。

结果

在56项指标中,评估得出6项指标的实施水平为“高”,24项指标为“中”,22项指标为“低”,4项指标为“极低”。实施水平高的指标包括强有力且明显的政治支持、纯母乳喂养和辅食添加的目标、对防治各种形式营养不良行动的强有力且明显的政治支持、纯母乳喂养和辅食添加指标的监测、促进和生长监测计划的监测以及协调机制(国家、州和地方政府)。菜单标签、降低健康食品税收、提高不健康食品税收和膳食指南等指标在布基纳法索的实施水平为“极低”。

结论

总体结果表明,显然需要进一步改进政策和基础设施支持,以促进健康食品环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1311/11822587/b4459ee02ae2/S1368980024002568_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1311/11822587/c12febc9e7a5/S1368980024002568_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1311/11822587/b4459ee02ae2/S1368980024002568_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1311/11822587/c12febc9e7a5/S1368980024002568_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1311/11822587/b4459ee02ae2/S1368980024002568_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the implementation of governmental policies and actions to create healthy food environments in Burkina Faso.对布基纳法索政府为营造健康食品环境而实施的政策和行动的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 2;28(1):e31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002568.
2
Food Environment in Burkina Faso: Review of Public Policies and Government Actions Using the Food-EPI Tool.布基纳法索的食物环境:利用食物-EPI 工具审查公共政策和政府行动。
Food Nutr Bull. 2024 Jun;45(2-3):74-90. doi: 10.1177/03795721241248214. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel's assessment and priority recommendations.肯尼亚预防与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的食品环境政策基准测试:国家专家小组的评估和重点建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
4
Pilot test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to increase government actions for creating healthy food environments.健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的初步测试,以增加政府为营造健康食品环境而采取的行动。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 9;5(1):e006194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194.
5
Food environment in Burkina Faso: priority actions recommended to the government using Food-EPI tool.布基纳法索的食物环境:使用食物环境政策指数工具向政府推荐的优先行动。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 18;11:1420323. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1420323. eCollection 2024.
6
Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations.马来西亚政府实施食品环境政策的程度:差距和优先建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3395-3406. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002379. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts' Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).在加拿大创建更健康的食物环境的政策:使用健康食物环境政策指数(Food-EPI)评估专家和优先行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224473.
8
Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study.衡量和推动广泛推荐的食品环境政策实施进展:新西兰案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jan 25;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0278-0.
9
Evaluation and prioritization of food environment policies in Norway using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).使用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)对挪威的食品环境政策进行评估和优先排序。
Food Nutr Res. 2023 Apr 17;67. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v67.9117. eCollection 2023.
10
An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018.11 个国家使用健康食品环境政策指数对各国政府实施推荐营养政策的情况进行基准测试,2015-2018 年。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:57-66. doi: 10.1111/obr.12819. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Food environment in Burkina Faso: priority actions recommended to the government using Food-EPI tool.布基纳法索的食物环境:使用食物环境政策指数工具向政府推荐的优先行动。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 18;11:1420323. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1420323. eCollection 2024.
2
Food Environment in Burkina Faso: Review of Public Policies and Government Actions Using the Food-EPI Tool.布基纳法索的食物环境:利用食物-EPI 工具审查公共政策和政府行动。
Food Nutr Bull. 2024 Jun;45(2-3):74-90. doi: 10.1177/03795721241248214. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Policy implementation and priorities to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): A pooled level analysis across eleven European countries.
使用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)创建健康食品环境的政策实施与优先事项:对11个欧洲国家的汇总水平分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Nov 16;23:100522. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100522. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Evaluation and prioritisation of actions on food environments to address the double burden of malnutrition in Senegal: perspectives from a national expert panel.塞内加尔应对营养不良双重负担的食物环境行动评估与优先排序:国家专家小组的观点
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2043-2055. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000702. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Facilitating factors and challenges of the implementation of multisectoral nutrition programmes at the community level to improve optimal infant and young child feeding practices: a qualitative study in Burkina Faso.社区层面实施多部门营养方案以改善婴幼儿最佳喂养实践的促进因素和挑战:布基纳法索的一项定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3756-3767. doi: 10.1017/S136898002000347X. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel's assessment and priority recommendations.肯尼亚预防与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的食品环境政策基准测试:国家专家小组的评估和重点建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
7
Implementation of healthy food environment policies to prevent nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana: National experts' assessment of government action.加纳实施健康食品环境政策以预防营养相关非传染性疾病:国家专家对政府行动的评估
Food Policy. 2020 May;93:101907. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101907.
8
Policy overview of the multisectoral nutrition planning process: The progress, challenges, and lessons learned from Burkina Faso.多部门营养规划过程的政策概述:布基纳法索的进展、挑战及经验教训
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Jan;35(1):120-139. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2823. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
9
An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018.11 个国家使用健康食品环境政策指数对各国政府实施推荐营养政策的情况进行基准测试,2015-2018 年。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:57-66. doi: 10.1111/obr.12819. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Role of government policy in nutrition-barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating.政府政策在营养方面的作用——阻碍健康饮食的因素和促进健康饮食的机会。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2426.