African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
Unhealthy food environments drive the increase of diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
We aimed to examine healthy food environment policies in Kenya and identify priorities for future action.
Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) we collected evidence on the extent of government action to create healthy food environments across 13 policy and infrastructure support domains and 43 related good practice indicators between 2017 and 2018. A panel of 15 national experts rated the extent of government action on each indicator compared to the policy development cycle and international best practice respectively. Based on gaps found, actions to improve food environments in Kenya were identified and prioritized.
In the policy development cycle, 16/43 (37%) of good practice policy indicators were judged to be in 'implementation' phase, including: food composition targets, packaged foods' ingredient lists/nutrient declarations; systems regulating health claims; restrictions on marketing breast milk substitutes; and school nutrition policies. Infrastructure support actions in 'implementation' phase included: food-based dietary guidelines; strong political support to reduce NCDs; comprehensive NCD action plan; transparency in developing food policies; and surveys monitoring nutritional status. Half (22/43) of the indicators were judged to be 'in development'. Compared to international best practice, the Kenyan Government was judged to be performing relatively well ('medium' implementation) in one policy (restrictions on marketing breast milk substitutes) and three infrastructure support areas (political leadership; comprehensive implementation plan; and ensuring all food policies are sensitive to nutrition). Implementation for 36 (83.7%) indicators were rated as 'low' or 'very little'. Taking into account importance and feasibility, seven actions within the areas of leadership, food composition, labelling, promotion, prices and health-in-all-policies were prioritized.
This baseline assessment is important in creating awareness to address gaps in food environment policy. Regular monitoring using Food-EPI may contribute to addressing the burden of diet-related NCDs in Kenya.
不健康的食品环境导致与饮食相关的非传染性疾病(NCDs)不断增加。
我们旨在研究肯尼亚的健康食品环境政策,并确定未来行动的优先事项。
使用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI),我们收集了 2017 年至 2018 年期间政府在 13 个政策和基础设施支持领域以及 43 个相关良好实践指标方面采取行动以创造健康食品环境的证据。一个由 15 名国家专家组成的小组根据每个指标相对于政策制定周期和国际最佳实践的程度对政府采取的行动进行了评分。基于发现的差距,确定并优先考虑了肯尼亚改善食品环境的行动。
在政策制定周期中,43 个良好实践政策指标中有 16 个(37%)被认为处于“实施”阶段,包括:食品成分目标、包装食品成分清单/营养声明;监管健康声称的系统;限制营销母乳代用品;以及学校营养政策。处于“实施”阶段的基础设施支持行动包括:基于食物的膳食指南;强有力的政治支持以减少非传染性疾病;全面的非传染性疾病行动计划;制定食品政策的透明度;以及监测营养状况的调查。一半(22/43)的指标被认为处于“发展中”阶段。与国际最佳实践相比,肯尼亚政府在一项政策(限制营销母乳代用品)和三个基础设施支持领域(政治领导、全面实施计划和确保所有食品政策对营养敏感)的表现被认为相对较好(“中等”实施)。36 个(83.7%)指标的实施情况被评为“低”或“非常低”。考虑到重要性和可行性,在领导、食品成分、标签、促销、价格和全政策健康等领域确定了七个优先行动。
这项基线评估对于提高对食品环境政策差距的认识很重要。使用 Food-EPI 进行定期监测可能有助于解决肯尼亚与饮食相关的非传染性疾病负担。