• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的初步测试,以增加政府为营造健康食品环境而采取的行动。

Pilot test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to increase government actions for creating healthy food environments.

机构信息

University of Auckland, School of Population Health, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 9;5(1):e006194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194
PMID:25575874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4289721/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Effective government policies are essential to increase the healthiness of food environments. The International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) has developed a monitoring tool (the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)) and process to rate government policies to create healthy food environments against international best practice. The aims of this study were to pilot test the Food-EPI, and revise the tool and process for international implementation.

SETTING

New Zealand.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-nine informed, independent public health experts and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Evidence on the extent of government implementation of different policies on food environments and infrastructure support was collected in New Zealand and validated with government officials. Two whole-day workshops were convened of public health experts and NGO representatives who rated performance of their government for seven policy and seven infrastructure support domains against international best practice. In addition, the raters evaluated the level of difficulty of rating, and appropriateness and completeness of the evidence presented for each indicator.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88; Gwet's AC2) using quadratic weights, and increased to 0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92) after deletion of the problematic indicators. Based on raters' assessments and comments, major changes to the Food-EPI tool include strengthening the leadership domain, removing the workforce development domain, a stronger focus on equity, and adding community-based programmes and government funding for research on obesity and diet-related NCD prevention, as good practice indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The resulting tool and process will be promoted and offered to countries of varying size and income globally. International benchmarking of the extent of government policy implementation on food environments has the potential to catalyse greater government action to reduce obesity and NCDs, and increase civil society's capacity to advocate for healthy food environments.

摘要

目的

有效的政府政策对于改善食品环境的健康状况至关重要。国际食品与肥胖/非传染性疾病(NCD)研究、监测和行动支持网络(INFORMAS)开发了一种监测工具(健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI))和流程,以根据国际最佳实践对政府政策进行评级,以创建健康的食品环境。本研究的目的是对 Food-EPI 进行试点测试,并对该工具和流程进行修订,以在国际上实施。

背景

新西兰。

参与者

39 名知识渊博、独立的公共卫生专家和非政府组织(NGO)代表。

主要和次要结果测量

在新西兰收集了有关政府实施不同食品环境政策和基础设施支持的程度的证据,并与政府官员进行了验证。召集了两次为期一天的研讨会,由公共卫生专家和 NGO 代表参加,他们根据国际最佳实践,对其政府在七个政策和七个基础设施支持领域的表现进行了评估。此外,评估人员评估了评分的难度级别、以及每个指标所提供证据的适当性和完整性。

结果

使用二次权重,评分者之间的可靠性为 0.85(95%置信区间 0.81 至 0.88;Gwet 的 AC2),在删除有问题的指标后增加到 0.89(95%置信区间 0.85 至 0.92)。根据评分者的评估和意见,对 Food-EPI 工具的主要更改包括加强领导力领域、删除劳动力发展领域、更加关注公平、并添加基于社区的计划和政府为肥胖和与饮食相关的 NCD 预防研究提供的资金,作为良好实践指标。

结论

由此产生的工具和流程将在全球不同规模和收入的国家中得到推广和提供。对政府在食品环境政策实施程度方面的国际基准测试有可能促进政府采取更多行动来减少肥胖和 NCD,并增强民间社会倡导健康食品环境的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/ea23db852ecf/bmjopen2014006194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/02652078fc02/bmjopen2014006194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/b12db169d6a0/bmjopen2014006194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/ea23db852ecf/bmjopen2014006194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/02652078fc02/bmjopen2014006194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/b12db169d6a0/bmjopen2014006194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34e/4289721/ea23db852ecf/bmjopen2014006194f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Pilot test of the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) to increase government actions for creating healthy food environments.健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)的初步测试,以增加政府为营造健康食品环境而采取的行动。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 9;5(1):e006194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006194.
2
Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy Food Environment Policy Index.监测和基准化政府政策和行动,以改善食品环境的健康程度:拟议的政府健康食品环境政策指数。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:24-37. doi: 10.1111/obr.12073.
3
Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study.衡量和推动广泛推荐的食品环境政策实施进展:新西兰案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jan 25;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0278-0.
4
Benchmarking food environment policies for the prevention of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Kenya: National expert panel's assessment and priority recommendations.肯尼亚预防与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的食品环境政策基准测试:国家专家小组的评估和重点建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0236699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236699. eCollection 2020.
5
Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala.与最佳实践相比,对公共政策进行基准测试以创建健康食品环境:危地马拉的健康食品环境政策指数
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;80(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w.
6
Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction.在新西兰实施健康食品环境政策:九年无所作为。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 15;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8.
7
Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations.马来西亚政府实施食品环境政策的程度:差距和优先建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3395-3406. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002379. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
8
Towards global benchmarking of food environments and policies to reduce obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: design and methods for nation-wide surveys.迈向全球食物环境与政策基准设定以减少肥胖及与饮食相关的非传染性疾病:全国性调查的设计与方法
BMJ Open. 2014 May 15;4(5):e005339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005339.
9
The INFORMAS healthy food environment policy index (Food-EPI) in Mexico: An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations.墨西哥的 INFORMAS 健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI):实施差距评估和优先建议。
Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:67-77. doi: 10.1111/obr.12814. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Implementation of healthy food environment policies to prevent nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana: National experts' assessment of government action.加纳实施健康食品环境政策以预防营养相关非传染性疾病:国家专家对政府行动的评估
Food Policy. 2020 May;93:101907. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101907.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the implementation of governmental policies and actions to create healthy food environments in Burkina Faso.对布基纳法索政府为营造健康食品环境而实施的政策和行动的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 2;28(1):e31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002568.
2
Working young adults' engagement with public and workplace health promotion efforts in Singapore: A qualitative study.工作年轻成年人在新加坡参与公共和工作场所健康促进工作:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0309983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309983. eCollection 2024.
3
Food environment in Burkina Faso: priority actions recommended to the government using Food-EPI tool.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking government action for obesity prevention--an innovative advocacy strategy.对政府预防肥胖行动进行基准评估——一种创新的宣传策略。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jul-Aug;8(4):e388-98. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Symposium report: the prevention of obesity and NCDs: challenges and opportunities for governments.专题研讨会报告:肥胖与非传染性疾病的预防——政府面临的挑战与机遇
Obes Rev. 2014 Aug;15(8):630-9. doi: 10.1111/obr.12193. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Large reductions in child overweight and obesity in intervention and comparison communities 3 years after a community project.
布基纳法索的食物环境:使用食物环境政策指数工具向政府推荐的优先行动。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 18;11:1420323. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1420323. eCollection 2024.
4
Policy implementation and recommended actions to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): a comparative analysis in South Asia.利用健康食品环境政策指数(Food-EPI)创建健康食品环境的政策实施及建议行动:南亚的比较分析
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Jun 26;26:100428. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100428. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Academy of Plant-based Physical Therapy: overdue to address a nutrition crisis with a transformative population approach.植物性物理治疗学会:早就应该采用变革性的人群方法来应对营养危机了。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2023 Sep;35(9):645-658. doi: 10.1589/jpts.35.645. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
6
Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala.与最佳实践相比,对公共政策进行基准测试以创建健康食品环境:危地马拉的健康食品环境政策指数
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;80(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w.
7
Evaluation and prioritisation of actions on food environments to address the double burden of malnutrition in Senegal: perspectives from a national expert panel.塞内加尔应对营养不良双重负担的食物环境行动评估与优先排序:国家专家小组的观点
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2043-2055. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000702. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
8
Implementing healthy food environment policies in New Zealand: nine years of inaction.在新西兰实施健康食品环境政策:九年无所作为。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 15;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00809-8.
9
The European Food Regulatory Environment Index: a tool to monitor progress in implementing food environment policies.欧洲食品监管环境指数:监测食品环境政策实施进展的工具。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):261-266. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab106.
10
An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations on food environment policies: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Japan.评估食品环境政策的实施差距和优先建议:日本健康食品环境政策指数。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jun;25(6):1720-1732. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004900. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
社区项目开展三年后,干预社区和对照社区儿童超重和肥胖情况大幅下降。
Pediatr Obes. 2014 Dec;9(6):455-62. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00201.x. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
4
Dietary inequalities: what is the evidence for the effect of the neighbourhood food environment?饮食不平等:邻里食物环境影响的证据有哪些?
Health Place. 2014 May;27:229-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
5
A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework.健康饮食与肥胖及饮食相关非传染性疾病预防的食品政策方案:滋养框架。
Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14 Suppl 2:159-68. doi: 10.1111/obr.12098.
6
Trade policy and obesity prevention: challenges and innovation in the Pacific Islands.贸易政策与肥胖预防:太平洋岛屿面临的挑战与创新
Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14 Suppl 2:150-8. doi: 10.1111/obr.12090.
7
A proposed approach to monitor private-sector policies and practices related to food environments, obesity and non-communicable disease prevention.一种旨在监测私营部门与食品环境、肥胖和非传染性疾病预防相关政策和做法的建议方法。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:38-48. doi: 10.1111/obr.12074.
8
Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: a proposed Government Healthy Food Environment Policy Index.监测和基准化政府政策和行动,以改善食品环境的健康程度:拟议的政府健康食品环境政策指数。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:24-37. doi: 10.1111/obr.12073.
9
INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles.INFORMAS(国际食物和肥胖/非传染性疾病研究、监测和行动支持网络):概述和主要原则。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:1-12. doi: 10.1111/obr.12087.
10
Latin American countries crack down on junk food.拉丁美洲国家打击垃圾食品。
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):385-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61657-8.