Eddy Ethan, Campbell Evan, Bateman Scott, Scheme Erik
Institute of Biomedical Engineering and the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Faculty of Computer Science, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
J Neural Eng. 2025 Jan 17;22(1). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ada4df.
While myoelectric control has been commercialized in prosthetics for decades, its adoption for more general human-machine interaction has been slow. Although high accuracies can be achieved across many gestures, current control approaches are prone to false activations in real-world conditions. This is because the same electromyogram (EMG) signals generated during the elicitation of gestures are also naturally activated when performing activities of daily living (ADLs), such as when driving to work or while typing on a keyboard. This can lead the myoelectric control system, which is trained on a closed set of gestures and thus unaware of the muscle activity associated with these ADLs, to be falsely activated, leading to erroneous inputs and user frustration.To overcome this problem, the concept of wake gestures, whereby users could switch between a dedicated control mode and a sleep mode by snapping their fingers, was explored. Using a simple dynamic time warping model, the real-world user-in-the-loop efficacy of wake gestures as a toggle for myoelectric interfaces was demonstrated through two online ubiquitous control tasks with varying levels of difficulty: (1) dismissing an alarm and (2) controlling a robot.During these online evaluations, the designed system ignored almost all (>99.9%) non-target EMG activity generated during a set of ADLs (i.e. walking, typing, writing, phone use, and driving), ignored all control gestures (i.e. wrist flexion, wrist extension, hand open, and hand close), and enabled reliable mode switching during intentional wake gesture elicitation. Additionally, questionnaires revealed that participants responded well to the use of wake gestures and generally preferred false negatives over false positives, providing valuable insights into the future design of these systems.These results highlight the real-world viability of wake gestures for enabling the intermittent use of myoelectric control, opening up new interaction possibilities for EMG-based inputs.
虽然肌电控制在假肢领域已经商业化应用了几十年,但在更广泛的人机交互中的应用却进展缓慢。尽管在许多手势上都能实现高精度,但当前的控制方法在实际应用中容易出现误激活。这是因为在做出手势时产生的相同肌电图(EMG)信号,在进行日常生活活动(ADL)时,如开车上班或在键盘上打字时,也会自然激活。这可能导致肌电控制系统被误激活,该系统是在一组特定手势上进行训练的,因此对与这些日常生活活动相关的肌肉活动并不了解,从而导致错误输入并让用户感到沮丧。为了克服这个问题,人们探索了唤醒手势的概念,即用户可以通过打响指在专用控制模式和睡眠模式之间切换。使用一个简单的动态时间规整模型,通过两个难度不同的在线普适控制任务,展示了唤醒手势作为肌电接口切换开关在实际用户参与情况下的有效性:(1)关闭闹钟和(2)控制机器人。在这些在线评估中,设计的系统几乎忽略了在一组日常生活活动(即行走、打字、书写、使用手机和开车)中产生的所有(>99.9%)非目标EMG活动,忽略了所有控制手势(即手腕弯曲、手腕伸展、手张开和手闭合),并在有意做出唤醒手势时实现了可靠的模式切换。此外,问卷调查显示,参与者对唤醒手势的使用反应良好,并且通常更倾向于误报为否而不是误报为是,这为这些系统的未来设计提供了有价值的见解。这些结果突出了唤醒手势在实现肌电控制间歇性使用方面的实际可行性,为基于EMG的输入开辟了新的交互可能性。