Awad Emmanuelle, Malaeb Diana, Fawaz Mirna, Youssef Lara, Brytek-Matera Anna, Hallit Souheil, Obeid Sahar
Department of Psychology and Education, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Jan 3;38(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00334-x.
Dieting is a common practice around the world. People who wish to lose weight, improve their eating habits, or reach a desired level of health often diet. Rumination, a pattern of repetitive negative thoughts and emotions, is typically found when individuals diet. The current study aimed to identify physical and psychological differences between maladaptive and normative eating behaviors in a sample from Lebanon.
A cross-sectional design was adopted for the current study. It occurred between June and July 2022. Four hundred participants aged 18 and above participated. The research team used a snowball sampling method to recruit volunteers from all governorates of Lebanon.
Beta values were used to compare independent variables in order to infer those that have the strongest effect on the dependent ones. Higher Body Mass Index, and belonging to cluster 3 (restriction of food intake and rumination) and cluster 1 (maladaptive eating behavior and rumination) compared to cluster 2 (normative eating behavior and thought) were significantly related to more dieting. Higher physical activity index and belonging to cluster 3 (restriction of food intake and rumination) and cluster 1 (maladaptive eating behavior and rumination) compared to cluster 2 (normative eating behavior and thought) were significantly related to higher levels of orthorexia nervosa tendencies.
The current research demonstrated a relationship between Body Mass Index, physical activity, rumination, and maladaptive eating patterns including restriction of food intake, dieting, and orthorexia nervosa. These results can help with identifying physical and psychological factors associated with maladaptive eating patterns, as well as guide interventions within the Lebanese population.
节食在世界各地都是一种常见的行为。想要减肥、改善饮食习惯或达到理想健康水平的人经常会节食。反刍思维,即一种反复出现的消极想法和情绪模式,通常在个体节食时出现。本研究旨在确定黎巴嫩样本中适应不良与正常饮食行为之间的生理和心理差异。
本研究采用横断面设计。研究于2022年6月至7月进行。400名18岁及以上的参与者参与其中。研究团队采用滚雪球抽样方法从黎巴嫩所有省份招募志愿者。
使用β值比较自变量,以推断对因变量影响最强的因素。与第2组(正常饮食行为和思维)相比,较高的体重指数、属于第3组(食物摄入受限和反刍思维)和第1组(适应不良的饮食行为和反刍思维)与更多的节食显著相关。与第2组(正常饮食行为和思维)相比,较高的身体活动指数、属于第3组(食物摄入受限和反刍思维)和第1组(适应不良的饮食行为和反刍思维)与较高水平的健康饮食强迫症倾向显著相关。
当前研究表明体重指数、身体活动、反刍思维和适应不良的饮食模式(包括食物摄入受限、节食和健康饮食强迫症)之间存在关联。这些结果有助于识别与适应不良饮食模式相关的生理和心理因素,并指导黎巴嫩人群的干预措施。