Suppr超能文献

非增强磁共振成像与钆塞酸增强简化方案在检测结直肠癌肝转移中的对比评估

Comparative evaluation of non-contrast MRI versus gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated protocols in detecting colorectal liver metastases.

作者信息

Dai Haoran, Yan Cheng, Jia Xi, Xiao Yuyao, Liang Xinyue, Yang Chun, Liu Kai, Zeng Mengsu

机构信息

School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai For Science and Technolgy, Shanghai, China.

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2025 Jan 2;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01886-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compares the diagnostic efficacy of non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocols with Gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated MRI for detecting colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), focusing on lesion characterization and surveillance.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients, including 55 with pathologically verified CRLM, were enrolled, totaling 422 lesions (287 metastatic, 135 benign). Two independent readers assessed three MRI protocols per patient: Protocol 1 included non-contrast sequences (T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, T1-weighted Dixon, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and ADC mapping). Protocol 2 included gadoxetic acid enhancement with hepatobiliary phase imaging, T2 TSE, DWI, and ADC maps. Protocol 3 utilized the standard Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI sequence, which included pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging, T1-weighted Dixon sequences, post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (including arterial, portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases), and additional T2-weighted and DWI sequences. Diagnoses were scored on a 5-point scale (benign = 1; malignant = 5), with scores ≥ 3 indicating CRLM. ROC curves analyzed diagnostic accuracy, comparing area under the curve (AUC) values across protocols.

RESULTS

No significant difference in AUCs was observed between Protocol 1 (0.899-0.909) and Protocol 2 (0.906-0.931) versus Protocol 3 (0.935-0.939) (p = 0.091-0.195). For lesions ≤ 10 mm, Protocol 1 was slightly inferior to Protocol 3 (p = 0.002-0.032), while Protocol 2 remained comparably effective (p = 0.096-0.179). These findings held when using a threshold of ≥ 4 to define CRLM.

CONCLUSION

The non-enhanced abbreviated MRI protocol is as effective as the gadoxetic acid-enhanced protocol in identifying CRLM. The proposed Ab-MRI approach may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) protocol is as effective as the gadoxetic acid-enhanced protocol in identifying colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The proposed Ab-MRI approach may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.

KEY POINTS

Two abbreviated protocols are proposed for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) surveillance. The non-enhanced protocol showed equivalent efficacy and was more cost-effective. The non-enhanced protocol may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.

摘要

目的

本研究比较非增强简化MRI方案与钆塞酸增强简化MRI在检测结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)方面的诊断效能,重点关注病变特征及监测情况。

方法

纳入94例患者,其中55例经病理证实为CRLM,共计422个病灶(287个转移灶,135个良性病灶)。两名独立阅片者对每位患者的三种MRI方案进行评估:方案1包括非增强序列(T2加权快速自旋回波序列、T1加权狄克逊序列、扩散加权成像(DWI)及表观扩散系数(ADC)图)。方案2包括钆塞酸增强及肝胆期成像、T2加权快速自旋回波序列、DWI及ADC图。方案3采用标准钆塞酸增强MRI序列,包括增强前T1加权成像、T1加权狄克逊序列、增强后T1加权成像(包括动脉期、门静脉期、移行期及肝胆期),以及额外的T2加权和DWI序列。诊断结果按5分制评分(良性=1分;恶性=5分),评分≥3分表明为CRLM。绘制ROC曲线分析诊断准确性,比较各方案的曲线下面积(AUC)值。

结果

方案1(0.899 - 0.909)和方案2(0.906 - 0.931)与方案3(0.935 - 0.939)之间的AUC无显著差异(p = 0.091 - 0.195)。对于直径≤10 mm的病灶,方案1略逊于方案3(p = 0.002 -  0.032),而方案2的有效性相当(p = 0.096 - 0.179)。当使用≥4分的阈值定义CRLM时,这些结果依然成立。

结论

非增强简化MRI方案在识别CRLM方面与钆塞酸增强方案同样有效。所提出的简化MRI方法可能是CRLM监测的一种可行替代方案。

关键相关性声明

非增强简化MRI(Ab-MRI)方案在识别结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)方面与钆塞酸增强方案同样有效。所提出的Ab-MRI方法可能是CRLM监测的一种可行替代方案。

要点

提出了两种用于结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)监测的简化方案。非增强方案显示出同等效能且更具成本效益。非增强方案可能是CRLM监测的一种可行替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b291/11695540/5397352ee82e/13244_2024_1886_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验