• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于后续研究的常见疾病遗传风险变异优先级排序的贝叶斯效应大小排名

Bayesian Effect Size Ranking to Prioritise Genetic Risk Variants in Common Diseases for Follow-Up Studies.

作者信息

Crouch Daniel J M, Inshaw Jamie R J, Robertson Catherine C, Ng Esther, Zhang Jia-Yuan, Chen Wei-Min, Onengut-Gumuscu Suna, Cutler Antony J, Sidore Carlo, Cucca Francesco, Pociot Flemming, Concannon Patrick, Rich Stephen S, Todd John A

机构信息

JDRF/Wellcome Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Human Genetics, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22608. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22608.

DOI:10.1002/gepi.22608
PMID:39749473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11696485/
Abstract

Biological datasets often consist of thousands or millions of variables, e.g. genetic variants or biomarkers, and when sample sizes are large it is common to find many associated with an outcome of interest, for example, disease risk in a GWAS, at high levels of statistical significance, but with very small effects. The False Discovery Rate (FDR) is used to identify effects of interest based on ranking variables according to their statistical significance. Here, we develop a complementary measure to the FDR, the priorityFDR, that ranks variables by a combination of effect size and significance, allowing further prioritisation among a set of variables that pass a significance or FDR threshold. Applying to the largest GWAS of type 1 diabetes to date (15,573 cases and 158,408 controls), we identified 26 independent genetic associations, including two newly-reported loci, with qualitatively lower priorityFDRs than the remaining 175 signals. We detected putatively causal type 1 diabetes risk genes using Mendelian Randomisation, and found that these were located disproportionately close to low priorityFDR signals (p = 0.005), as were genes in the IL-2 pathway (p = 0.003). Selecting variables on both effect size and significance can lead to improved prioritisation for mechanistic follow-up studies from genetic and other large biological datasets.

摘要

生物数据集通常包含成千上万或数百万个变量,例如基因变异或生物标志物。当样本量很大时,常常会发现许多与感兴趣的结果相关的变量,例如在全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中与疾病风险相关的变量,这些变量具有很高的统计显著性,但效应非常小。错误发现率(FDR)用于根据变量的统计显著性对其进行排序,从而识别感兴趣的效应。在此,我们开发了一种FDR的补充指标——优先FDR,它通过效应大小和显著性的组合对变量进行排序,从而能够在一组通过显著性或FDR阈值的变量中进一步进行优先级排序。将其应用于迄今为止最大的1型糖尿病GWAS(15573例病例和158408例对照),我们确定了26个独立的基因关联,包括两个新报道的基因座,其优先FDR在质量上低于其余175个信号。我们使用孟德尔随机化检测了可能导致1型糖尿病风险的基因,发现这些基因不成比例地靠近低优先FDR信号(p = 0.005),白细胞介素-2途径中的基因也是如此(p = 0.003)。在效应大小和显著性两方面选择变量,可以提高从遗传和其他大型生物数据集中进行机制后续研究的优先级排序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/52bafbb9fce5/GEPI-49-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/fce611b20186/GEPI-49-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/82c757b17131/GEPI-49-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/db7f4407a777/GEPI-49-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/52bafbb9fce5/GEPI-49-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/fce611b20186/GEPI-49-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/82c757b17131/GEPI-49-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/db7f4407a777/GEPI-49-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f13/11696485/52bafbb9fce5/GEPI-49-0-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian Effect Size Ranking to Prioritise Genetic Risk Variants in Common Diseases for Follow-Up Studies.用于后续研究的常见疾病遗传风险变异优先级排序的贝叶斯效应大小排名
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22608. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22608.
2
A pleiotropy-informed Bayesian false discovery rate adapted to a shared control design finds new disease associations from GWAS summary statistics.一种适应共享对照设计的多效性信息贝叶斯错误发现率可从全基因组关联研究汇总统计数据中发现新的疾病关联。
PLoS Genet. 2015 Feb 6;11(2):e1004926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004926. eCollection 2015 Feb.
3
Based on systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for diabetes.基于系统药物基因组全基因组孟德尔随机化鉴定糖尿病治疗靶点。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 10;15:1366290. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1366290. eCollection 2024.
4
Genome-wide genetic analyses highlight mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.全基因组遗传分析突出了丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路在子宫内膜异位症发病机制中的作用。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):780-793. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex024.
5
Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.帕金森病的新风险基因座鉴定、因果关系洞察和遗传风险:全基因组关联研究的荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Dec;18(12):1091-1102. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30320-5.
6
Identification of genetic association between mitochondrial dysfunction and knee osteoarthritis through integrating multi-omics: a summary data-based Mendelian randomization study.通过整合多组学技术识别线粒体功能障碍与膝骨关节炎的遗传关联:基于汇总数据的孟德尔随机化研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;43(11):3487-3496. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07136-7. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
7
SNP-based pathway enrichment analysis for genome-wide association studies.基于 SNP 的通路富集分析在全基因组关联研究中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 15;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-99.
8
Mendelian Randomization and Bayesian Colocalization Analysis Implicate Glycoprotein VI as a Potential Drug Target for Cardioembolic Stroke in South Asian Populations.孟德尔随机化和贝叶斯共定位分析提示糖蛋白 VI 可能成为南亚人群心源性栓塞性卒中的潜在药物靶点。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e035008. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035008. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies three novel loci for circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析确定了女性循环抗苗勒管激素水平的三个新基因座。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):1069-1082. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac028.
10
Exploring new drug treatment targets for immune related bone diseases using a multi omics joint analysis strategy.使用多组学联合分析策略探索免疫相关骨疾病的新药治疗靶点。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94053-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify drug targets for heart failure.全基因组关联分析和孟德尔随机化蛋白质组学鉴定心力衰竭的药物靶点。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 10;14(1):3826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39253-3.
2
Proteogenomic links to human metabolic diseases.与人类代谢疾病相关的蛋白质基因组学联系。
Nat Metab. 2023 Mar;5(3):516-528. doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00753-7. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height.与人类身高相关的常见遗传变异的饱和图谱。
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7933):704-712. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05275-y. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Discovery and implications of polygenicity of common diseases.常见疾病多基因遗传的发现及其意义。
Science. 2021 Sep 24;373(6562):1468-1473. doi: 10.1126/science.abi8206. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression.大规模顺式和反式 eQTL 分析确定了数千个调节血液基因表达的遗传位点和多基因评分。
Nat Genet. 2021 Sep;53(9):1300-1310. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
The distribution of common-variant effect sizes.常见变异效应大小的分布。
Nat Genet. 2021 Aug;53(8):1243-1249. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00901-3. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Fine-mapping, trans-ancestral and genomic analyses identify causal variants, cells, genes and drug targets for type 1 diabetes.精细映射、跨祖先和基因组分析确定了 1 型糖尿病的因果变异、细胞、基因和药物靶点。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jul;53(7):962-971. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00880-5. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
8
Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics.用遗传学和单细胞表观基因组学解读 1 型糖尿病风险。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):398-402. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03552-w. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Analysis of overlapping genetic association in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.1 型和 2 型糖尿病重叠遗传关联分析。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1342-1347. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05428-0. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS.重新审视常见变异 GWAS 的全基因组显著阈值。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Feb 9;11(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa056.