• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.用于识别ICU药物使用模式以预测液体超负荷的无监督机器学习分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Feb;45(2):76-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.4642. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.用于识别ICU药物使用模式以预测液体超负荷的无监督机器学习分析。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 22:2024.03.21.24304663. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304663.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.用于哮喘加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
A common data model for the standardization of intensive care unit medication features.一种用于重症监护病房用药特征标准化的通用数据模型。
JAMIA Open. 2024 May 2;7(2):ooae033. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae033. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
3
Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU.机器学习与传统回归分析在 ICU 中预测液体超负荷的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 10;13(1):19654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46735-3.
4
Cluster analysis driven by unsupervised latent feature learning of medications to identify novel pharmacophenotypes of critically ill patients.基于药物无监督潜在特征学习的聚类分析,以确定危重症患者的新型药物表型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42657-2.
5
Evaluation of medication regimen complexity as a predictor for mortality.评估药物治疗方案的复杂性作为预测死亡率的指标。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37908-1.
6
Pharmacophenotype identification of intensive care unit medications using unsupervised cluster analysis of the ICURx common data model.使用 ICU Rx 通用数据模型的无监督聚类分析鉴定重症监护病房药物的药物表型。
Crit Care. 2023 May 2;27(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04437-2.
7
Prediction algorithm for ICU mortality and length of stay using machine learning.使用机器学习算法预测 ICU 死亡率和住院时间。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5.
8
Early Diuretics for De-resuscitation in Septic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction.早期使用利尿剂用于左心室功能不全的脓毒症患者的脱机治疗
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2022 May 13;16:11795468221095875. doi: 10.1177/11795468221095875. eCollection 2022.
9
Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness-A Machine Learning Approach.危重症中的液体超负荷表型——一种机器学习方法
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 11;11(2):336. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020336.
10
From theory to bedside: Implementation of fluid stewardship in a medical ICU pharmacy practice.从理论到床边:在医疗 ICU 药房实践中实施液体管理。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jun 7;79(12):984-992. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab453.

用于识别ICU药物使用模式以预测液体超负荷的无监督机器学习分析。

Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.

作者信息

Henry Kelli, Deng Shiyuan, Chen Xianyan, Zhang Tianyi, Devlin John W, Murphy David J, Smith Susan E, Murray Brian, Kamaleswaran Rishikesan, Most Amoreena, Sikora Andrea

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Wellstar MCG Health, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Statistics, University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Athens, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Feb;45(2):76-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.4642. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1002/phar.4642
PMID:39749877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11834896/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common, serious, and may be preventable. Intravenous medications (including administered volume) are a primary cause for FO but are challenging to evaluate as a FO predictor given the high frequency and time-dependency of their use and other factors affecting FO. We sought to employ unsupervised machine learning methods to uncover medication administration patterns correlating with FO.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 927 adults admitted to an ICU for ≥72 h. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight. After reviewing medication administration record data in 3-h periods, medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess their temporal association with FO.

RESULTS

FO occurred in 127 (13.7%) of 927 included patients. Patients received a median (interquartile range) of 31(13-65) discrete intravenous medication administrations over the 72-h period. Across all 47,803 intravenous medication administrations, 10 unique medication clusters, containing 121 to 130 medications per cluster, were identified. The mean number of Cluster 7 medications administered was significantly greater in the FO cohort compared with patients without FO (25.6 vs.10.9, p < 0.0001). A total of 51 (40.2%) of 127 unique Cluster 7 medications were administered in more than five different 3-h periods during the 72-h study window. The most common Cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of Cluster 7 medications to an FO prediction model including the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and receipt of diuretics improved model predictiveness from an Area Under the Receiver Operation Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.719 to 0.741 (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Using machine learning approaches, a unique medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict FO compared to traditional prediction models. Integration of this approach into real-time clinical applications may improve early detection of FO to facilitate timely intervention.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)中的液体超负荷(FO)很常见且严重,并且可能是可预防的。静脉用药(包括给药量)是FO的主要原因,但鉴于其使用频率高、具有时间依赖性以及影响FO的其他因素,将其作为FO的预测指标具有挑战性。我们试图采用无监督机器学习方法来发现与FO相关的用药模式。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了927名入住ICU≥72小时的成年人。FO被定义为液体平衡为入院体重的≥7%。在回顾3小时时间段内的用药记录数据后,使用主成分分析(PCA)和受限玻尔兹曼机(RBM)将用药暴露分类为不同类别。在不同类别中比较有FO和无FO患者的用药方案,以评估它们与FO的时间关联。

结果

927名纳入患者中有127名(13.7%)发生了FO。患者在72小时内接受的离散静脉用药中位数(四分位间距)为31次(13 - 65次)。在所有47,803次静脉用药中,识别出10个独特的用药类别,每个类别包含121至130种药物。与无FO的患者相比,FO队列中第7类药物的平均给药次数显著更多(25.6次对10.9次,p < 0.0001)。在72小时的研究窗口内,127种独特的第7类药物中有51种(40.2%)在超过五个不同的3小时时间段内给药。最常见的第7类药物包括持续输注药物、抗生素和镇静剂/镇痛药。将第7类药物添加到包括急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分和使用利尿剂的FO预测模型中,可使受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)从0.719提高到0.741(p = 0.027),从而改善模型预测能力。

结论

使用机器学习方法,一个独特的用药类别与FO密切相关。与传统预测模型相比,纳入该类别提高了预测FO的能力。将这种方法整合到实时临床应用中可能会改善FO的早期检测,以便及时进行干预。