Suppr超能文献

用于识别ICU药物使用模式以预测液体超负荷的无监督机器学习分析。

Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.

作者信息

Henry Kelli, Deng Shiyuan, Chen Xianyan, Zhang Tianyi, Devlin John W, Murphy David J, Smith Susan E, Murray Brian, Kamaleswaran Rishikesan, Most Amoreena, Sikora Andrea

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Wellstar MCG Health, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Statistics, University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Athens, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Feb;45(2):76-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.4642. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common, serious, and may be preventable. Intravenous medications (including administered volume) are a primary cause for FO but are challenging to evaluate as a FO predictor given the high frequency and time-dependency of their use and other factors affecting FO. We sought to employ unsupervised machine learning methods to uncover medication administration patterns correlating with FO.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 927 adults admitted to an ICU for ≥72 h. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight. After reviewing medication administration record data in 3-h periods, medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess their temporal association with FO.

RESULTS

FO occurred in 127 (13.7%) of 927 included patients. Patients received a median (interquartile range) of 31(13-65) discrete intravenous medication administrations over the 72-h period. Across all 47,803 intravenous medication administrations, 10 unique medication clusters, containing 121 to 130 medications per cluster, were identified. The mean number of Cluster 7 medications administered was significantly greater in the FO cohort compared with patients without FO (25.6 vs.10.9, p < 0.0001). A total of 51 (40.2%) of 127 unique Cluster 7 medications were administered in more than five different 3-h periods during the 72-h study window. The most common Cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of Cluster 7 medications to an FO prediction model including the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and receipt of diuretics improved model predictiveness from an Area Under the Receiver Operation Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.719 to 0.741 (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Using machine learning approaches, a unique medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict FO compared to traditional prediction models. Integration of this approach into real-time clinical applications may improve early detection of FO to facilitate timely intervention.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)中的液体超负荷(FO)很常见且严重,并且可能是可预防的。静脉用药(包括给药量)是FO的主要原因,但鉴于其使用频率高、具有时间依赖性以及影响FO的其他因素,将其作为FO的预测指标具有挑战性。我们试图采用无监督机器学习方法来发现与FO相关的用药模式。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了927名入住ICU≥72小时的成年人。FO被定义为液体平衡为入院体重的≥7%。在回顾3小时时间段内的用药记录数据后,使用主成分分析(PCA)和受限玻尔兹曼机(RBM)将用药暴露分类为不同类别。在不同类别中比较有FO和无FO患者的用药方案,以评估它们与FO的时间关联。

结果

927名纳入患者中有127名(13.7%)发生了FO。患者在72小时内接受的离散静脉用药中位数(四分位间距)为31次(13 - 65次)。在所有47,803次静脉用药中,识别出10个独特的用药类别,每个类别包含121至130种药物。与无FO的患者相比,FO队列中第7类药物的平均给药次数显著更多(25.6次对10.9次,p < 0.0001)。在72小时的研究窗口内,127种独特的第7类药物中有51种(40.2%)在超过五个不同的3小时时间段内给药。最常见的第7类药物包括持续输注药物、抗生素和镇静剂/镇痛药。将第7类药物添加到包括急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分和使用利尿剂的FO预测模型中,可使受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)从0.719提高到0.741(p = 0.027),从而改善模型预测能力。

结论

使用机器学习方法,一个独特的用药类别与FO密切相关。与传统预测模型相比,纳入该类别提高了预测FO的能力。将这种方法整合到实时临床应用中可能会改善FO的早期检测,以便及时进行干预。

相似文献

1
Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.
Pharmacotherapy. 2025 Feb;45(2):76-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.4642. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 22:2024.03.21.24304663. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304663.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A common data model for the standardization of intensive care unit medication features.
JAMIA Open. 2024 May 2;7(2):ooae033. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae033. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 10;13(1):19654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46735-3.
5
Evaluation of medication regimen complexity as a predictor for mortality.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 4;13(1):10784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37908-1.
7
Prediction algorithm for ICU mortality and length of stay using machine learning.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5.
8
Early Diuretics for De-resuscitation in Septic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction.
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2022 May 13;16:11795468221095875. doi: 10.1177/11795468221095875. eCollection 2022.
9
Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness-A Machine Learning Approach.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 11;11(2):336. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020336.
10
From theory to bedside: Implementation of fluid stewardship in a medical ICU pharmacy practice.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jun 7;79(12):984-992. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab453.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验