• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习算法预测 ICU 死亡率和住院时间。

Prediction algorithm for ICU mortality and length of stay using machine learning.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.

Smart 119 Inc., 7th floor, Chiba Chuo Twin Building No. 2, 2-5-1 Chuo, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5
PMID:35902633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9334583/
Abstract

Machine learning can predict outcomes and determine variables contributing to precise prediction, and can thus classify patients with different risk factors of outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the predictive accuracy for mortality and length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) patients using machine learning, and to identify the variables contributing to the precise prediction or classification of patients. Patients (n = 12,747) admitted to the ICU at Chiba University Hospital were randomly assigned to the training and test cohorts. After learning using the variables on admission in the training cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) was analyzed in the test cohort to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the supervised machine learning classifiers, including random forest (RF) for outcomes (primary outcome, mortality; secondary outcome, length of ICU stay). The rank of the variables that contributed to the machine learning prediction was confirmed, and cluster analysis of the patients with risk factors of mortality was performed to identify the important variables associated with patient outcomes. Machine learning using RF revealed a high predictive value for mortality, with an AUC of 0.945 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.922-0.977). In addition, RF showed high predictive value for short and long ICU stays, with AUCs of 0.881 (95% CI 0.876-0.908) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.849-0.936), respectively. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was identified as a variable contributing to the precise prediction in machine learning for both mortality and length of ICU stay. LDH was also identified as a contributing variable to classify patients into sub-populations based on different risk factors of mortality. The machine learning algorithm could predict mortality and length of stay in ICU patients with high accuracy. LDH was identified as a contributing variable in mortality and length of ICU stay prediction and could be used to classify patients based on mortality risk.

摘要

机器学习可以预测结果并确定导致精准预测的变量,从而对具有不同结果风险因素的患者进行分类。本研究旨在利用机器学习研究死亡率和重症监护病房(ICU)患者住院时间的预测准确性,并确定导致患者精准预测或分类的变量。将千叶大学医院 ICU 收治的患者(n=12747)随机分配到训练和测试队列中。在使用训练队列入院时的变量进行学习后,在测试队列中分析曲线下面积(AUC),以评估监督机器学习分类器的预测准确性,包括随机森林(RF)对结局(主要结局:死亡率;次要结局:ICU 住院时间)的预测。确认了对机器学习预测有贡献的变量的排名,并对具有死亡风险因素的患者进行聚类分析,以确定与患者结局相关的重要变量。使用 RF 的机器学习显示出对死亡率的高预测价值,AUC 为 0.945(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.922-0.977)。此外,RF 对短和长 ICU 住院时间也显示出较高的预测价值,AUC 分别为 0.881(95%CI 0.876-0.908)和 0.889(95%CI 0.849-0.936)。乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)被确定为在死亡率和 ICU 住院时间预测的机器学习中有助于精准预测的变量。LDH 也被确定为根据死亡率的不同风险因素对患者进行分类的变量。机器学习算法可以高精度预测 ICU 患者的死亡率和住院时间。LDH 被确定为死亡率和 ICU 住院时间预测的贡献变量,并可用于根据死亡率风险对患者进行分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/35fefa584033/41598_2022_17091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/c35dd9fd1df6/41598_2022_17091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/78d363406399/41598_2022_17091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/35fefa584033/41598_2022_17091_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/c35dd9fd1df6/41598_2022_17091_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/78d363406399/41598_2022_17091_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d027/9334583/35fefa584033/41598_2022_17091_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction algorithm for ICU mortality and length of stay using machine learning.使用机器学习算法预测 ICU 死亡率和住院时间。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 28;12(1):12912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17091-5.
2
Hospital Length of Stay and 30-Day Mortality Prediction in Stroke: A Machine Learning Analysis of 17,000 ICU Admissions in Brazil.医院住院时间和 30 天死亡率预测:巴西 17000 例 ICU 入院患者的机器学习分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01486-3. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
3
[Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay machine learning].[预测重症监护病房长期住院时间 机器学习]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Dec 18;53(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.026.
4
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Machine learning combining CT findings and clinical parameters improves prediction of length of stay and ICU admission in torso trauma.机器学习结合 CT 表现和临床参数可提高对胸腹部创伤患者住院时间和 ICU 入住的预测。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5434-5441. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07534-w. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Explainable time-series deep learning models for the prediction of mortality, prolonged length of stay and 30-day readmission in intensive care patients.用于预测重症监护患者死亡率、延长住院时间和30天再入院率的可解释时间序列深度学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:933037. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.933037. eCollection 2022.
8
Machine Learning-based Prediction of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay for Critical Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.基于机器学习对脊髓损伤重症患者重症监护病房长期住院情况的预测
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 May 1;47(9):E390-E398. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004267. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of generative artificial intelligence in outcome prediction in intensive care medicine-a scoping review.生成式人工智能在重症医学结局预测中的应用——一项范围综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 5;7:1633458. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1633458. eCollection 2025.
2
Trends and methods in intensive care unit (ICU) research using machine learning: latent dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based thematic literature review.使用机器学习的重症监护病房(ICU)研究的趋势与方法:基于潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)的主题文献综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 29;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03132-2.
3
AI-powered skin spectral imaging enables instant sepsis diagnosis and outcome prediction in critically ill patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Prediction of Mortality, Severity, and Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit of Sepsis Patients Based on Sepsis 3.0 by Machine Learning Models.基于脓毒症3.0,通过机器学习模型对脓毒症患者重症监护病房死亡率、严重程度及住院时间的早期预测
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 28;8:664966. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.664966. eCollection 2021.
2
Predicting the mortality risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome: radial basis function artificial neural network model versus logistic regression model.预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征的死亡率:径向基函数人工神经网络模型与逻辑回归模型。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Jun;36(3):839-848. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00716-x. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
人工智能驱动的皮肤光谱成像能够对重症患者进行败血症的即时诊断和预后预测。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 18;11(29):eadw1968. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw1968.
4
Advancing shock prediction: leveraging prior knowledge and self-controlled data for enhanced model accuracy and generalizability.推进休克预测:利用先验知识和自我控制的数据提高模型准确性和通用性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03108-2.
5
Combining Predictive Models of Mortality and Time-to-Discharge for Improved Outcome Assessment in Intensive Care Units.结合死亡率预测模型和出院时间预测模型以改善重症监护病房的预后评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4515. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134515.
6
Preoperative Indicators for 1-year Mortality in Elderly Individuals Following Hip Fracture Surgery Under A Multidisciplinary Team Co-Management Model: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.多学科团队共同管理模式下老年髋部骨折手术后1年死亡率的术前指标:一项单中心回顾性观察研究
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Jun 25;16:21514593251356135. doi: 10.1177/21514593251356135. eCollection 2025.
7
Toward Identifying New Risk Aversions and Subsequent Limitations and Biases When Making De-identified Structured Data Sets Openly Available in a Post-LLM world.在大语言模型时代,当使去识别化的结构化数据集公开可用时,致力于识别新的风险规避以及随之而来的限制和偏差。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:262-270. eCollection 2024.
8
A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records.一种使用纵向住院电子健康记录进行临床结局预测的深度学习模型。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Apr 10;8(2):ooaf026. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf026. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
A comparative study of neuro-fuzzy and neural network models in predicting length of stay in university hospital.神经模糊模型与神经网络模型在预测大学医院住院时间方面的比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12623-x.
10
A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records.一种使用纵向住院电子健康记录进行临床结局预测的深度学习模型。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 23:2025.01.21.25320916. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.21.25320916.
Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine.
重症监护医学中的人工智能
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;47(2):147-149. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06203-2. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
Prediction on critically ill patients: The role of "big data".危重症患者预测:“大数据”的作用。
J Crit Care. 2020 Dec;60:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
5
Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit.人工智能在重症监护病房中的应用。
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y.
6
Learning Latent Space Representations to Predict Patient Outcomes: Model Development and Validation.学习潜在空间表示以预测患者预后:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 23;22(3):e16374. doi: 10.2196/16374.
7
Length of stay prediction for ICU patients using individualized single classification algorithm.使用个体化单分类算法预测 ICU 患者的住院时间。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Apr;186:105224. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105224. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Use of machine learning to analyse routinely collected intensive care unit data: a systematic review.运用机器学习分析常规收集的重症监护病房数据:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2019 Aug 22;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2564-9.
9
Artificial intelligence in intensive care: are we there yet?重症监护中的人工智能:我们做到了吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1298-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05662-6. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Clinical differences between pulmonary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in Japan.肺内型与肺外型急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床差异:一项对日本前瞻性收集数据的回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(10):5796-5803. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.73.