Suppr超能文献

与微创电视辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)相比,经口内镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOEVA)用于单侧甲状腺切除术后急性期反应增加。

Increased acute-phase reaction after the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOEVA) compared with minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) for unilateral thyroidectomy.

作者信息

Zhang Daqi, Wan Lanlan, Frattini Francesco, Dionigi Gianlorenzo

机构信息

Division of Thyroid Surgery, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine On Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, China.

Department of Anesthesia, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2025 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02982-z.

Abstract

PURPOSES

We analyzed the acute-phase response in unilateral thyroidectomy by comparing the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOEVA) with the minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either TOEVA or MIVAT, after we obtained their written informed consent to participate in this study. Blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-) were measured before surgery and then 4, 24, and 48 h after surgery. The VAS pain score, analgesic utilization, and time to resume normal activities were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients who underwent TOETVA and 30 who underwent MIVAT. The groups were well balanced in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and preoperative values. There were no postoperative complications in this series. The operation time was longer in the TOETVA group (p < 0.001). Patients recommenced routine activities earlier after MIVAT (p < 0.05). The TOETVA group showed a greater drop in lymphocyte count 4 h (p < 0.01) and 24 h (p = 0.04) postoperatively, a higher ESR value 48 h postoperatively (p = 0.02), a longer increase in IL-6 (p = 0.05), 24 (p = 0.003) and 48 h postoperatively (p < 0.001), and a higher CRP 24 (p = 0.05) and 48 h postoperatively (p = 0.01) than the MIVAT group. There was no difference in postoperative IL-1β, TNF, total white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear cell count, and VAS or analgesic requirement between the groups, except on the day of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased inflammatory response in the acute phase was observed after TOETVA compared with MIVAT, suggesting that TOETVA is associated with increased tissue trauma. This may account for the earlier recovery after the MIVAT procedure.

摘要

目的

通过比较经口内镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOEVA)与微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT),分析单侧甲状腺切除术中的急性期反应。

方法

在获得患者参与本研究的书面知情同意后,将患者随机分配接受TOEVA或MIVAT。在手术前以及手术后4、24和48小时测量血常规、C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、IL-6和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-)。记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、镇痛药物使用情况以及恢复正常活动的时间。

结果

29例患者接受了TOETVA,30例接受了MIVAT。两组在年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和术前值方面均衡良好。本系列中无术后并发症。TOETVA组的手术时间更长(p < 0.001)。MIVAT术后患者恢复日常活动更早(p < 0.05)。TOETVA组术后4小时(p < 0.01)和24小时(p = 0.04)淋巴细胞计数下降幅度更大,术后48小时ESR值更高(p = 0.02),IL-6升高时间更长(p = 0.05),术后24小时(p = 0.003)和48小时(p < 0.001)更高,术后24小时(p = 0.05)和48小时CRP更高(p = 0.01),均高于MIVAT组。除手术当天外,两组术后IL-1β、TNF、白细胞总数、多形核细胞计数、VAS或镇痛需求无差异。

结论

与MIVAT相比,TOETVA术后急性期炎症反应增强,提示TOETVA与组织创伤增加有关。这可能解释了MIVAT术后恢复更快的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验