• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗医疗服务提供者使用的跨专业团队协作量表II(P-AITCS-II)波斯语改编版的效度和信度评估

Validation and reliability assessment of the Persian Adaptation of the Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (P-AITCS-II) for Iranian healthcare providers.

作者信息

Norouzinia Roohangiz, Saeieh Sara Esmaelzadeh, Orchard Carole, Mirzaei Samaneh, Jelodar Mohsen Gholinataj

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

Deputy of Research and Technology, Saffarian St. 45 Metri Golshahr, Karaj, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12192-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-12192-5
PMID:39754155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697801/
Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to perform a psychometric evaluation of the Persian adaptation of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (P-AITCS-II). This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the AITCS-II for practitioners within the Iranian healthcare context. Data were collected from a sample of 230 Iranian healthcare providers between May and June 2024. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good model fit indices (χ2 = 540.20, df = 224, χ2/df = 2.41, CFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.918, TLI = 0.907, PNFI = 0.768, PCFI = 0.812, and RMSEA = 0.079 [CI90% 0.070-0.087]). These results confirm the validity of the P-AITCS-II model. Additionally, the internal consistency and composite reliability of the three factors were higher than 0.7. Convergent validity was considered acceptable for the P-AITCS-II, as the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) was greater than 0.5. The Persian adaptation of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (P-AITC-II), consisting of 23 items within three factors-partnership, cooperation, and coordination-demonstrated good validity and reliability. However, further research is needed to confirm its robustness and usefulness for improving interprofessional team collaboration.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是对跨专业团队协作评估量表(P-AITCS-II)的波斯语改编版进行心理测量学评估。这项方法学研究旨在评估AITCS-II在伊朗医疗环境中对从业者的有效性和可靠性。数据于2024年5月至6月从230名伊朗医疗服务提供者的样本中收集。验证性因素分析显示出良好的模型拟合指数(χ2 = 540.20,df = 224,χ2/df = 2.41,CFI = 0.917,IFI = 0.918,TLI = 0.907,PNFI = 0.768,PCFI = 0.812,RMSEA = 0.079 [CI90% 0.070 - 0.087])。这些结果证实了P-AITCS-II模型的有效性。此外,三个因素的内部一致性和组合信度均高于0.7。由于平均提取方差(AVE)大于0.5,P-AITCS-II的收敛效度被认为是可接受的。跨专业团队协作评估量表II(P-AITC-II)的波斯语改编版由三个因素(伙伴关系、合作和协调)中的23个项目组成,显示出良好的效度和信度。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实其在改善跨专业团队协作方面的稳健性和实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/11697801/e0f142ec0299/12913_2024_12192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/11697801/e0f142ec0299/12913_2024_12192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eca/11697801/e0f142ec0299/12913_2024_12192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation and reliability assessment of the Persian Adaptation of the Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (P-AITCS-II) for Iranian healthcare providers.伊朗医疗服务提供者使用的跨专业团队协作量表II(P-AITCS-II)波斯语改编版的效度和信度评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12192-5.
2
Italian version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (I-AITCS II): a multiphase study of validity and reliability amongst healthcare providers.《跨专业团队协作评估量表II(意大利语版)》(I-AITCS II):医疗服务提供者有效性和可靠性的多阶段研究
Med Lav. 2018 Aug 28;109(4):316-324. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v109i4.7101.
3
Assessment of the Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale for Students-AITCS-II (Student): Development and Testing.学生跨专业团队协作量表评估-AITCS-II(学生):编制与检验。
J Allied Health. 2021 Spring;50(1):e1-e7.
4
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): Further Testing and Instrument Revision.跨专业团队协作量表(AITCS)评估:进一步测试与量表修订
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Winter;38(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000193.
5
Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): development and testing of the instrument.跨专业团队协作量表(AITCS)的评估:该工具的开发与测试
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Winter;32(1):58-67. doi: 10.1002/chp.21123.
6
Preliminary testing of the Swedish version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS-S).跨专业团队协作评估量表瑞典语版(AITCS-S)的初步测试。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):499-504. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159184. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
7
Psychometric properties of the educational leadership scale for nursing students.护理专业学生教育领导力量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 6;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07269-6.
8
Bullying behaviors in nursing education (BBNE) scale: a psychometric study among Iranian nursing students.护理教育中的欺凌行为(BBNE)量表:伊朗护理专业学生的一项心理测量学研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1500. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06504-w.
9
Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Assessment of Inter professional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS-S) for use in occupational health services.瑞典版跨专业团队合作评估量表(AITCS-S)在职业健康服务中的适应和心理计量学评估。
J Interprof Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):908-915. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1971637. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
Persian version of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief): the evaluation of the psychometric properties.简要老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL-brief)的波斯语版本:心理测量特性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01586-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of Emergency Medical Services- Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (EMS-SAQ).《紧急医疗服务-安全态度问卷(EMS-SAQ)波斯语版的心理计量学评估》。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00941-y.
2
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II (J-AITCS-II).《跨专业团队协作评估量表-II(日本版)》(J-AITCS-II)的翻译与跨文化调适
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Oct 23;8:195. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000195.1. eCollection 2019.
3
A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitude and Barriers to Interprofessional Collaboration in Hospitals Among Health Care Professionals.
横断面研究医院卫生保健专业人员之间的态度和跨专业合作障碍。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231171014. doi: 10.1177/00469580231171014.
4
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Family Caregivers' Hardiness Scale: A Sequential-Exploratory Mixed-Method Study.家庭照顾者心理韧性量表的编制与心理测量学评价:一项序列探索性混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:807049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807049. eCollection 2022.
5
Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Assessment of Inter professional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS-S) for use in occupational health services.瑞典版跨专业团队合作评估量表(AITCS-S)在职业健康服务中的适应和心理计量学评估。
J Interprof Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):908-915. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1971637. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Attitudes and Behavior towards Interprofessional Collaboration among Healthcare Professionals in a Large Academic Medical Center.大型学术医疗中心医护人员对跨专业协作的态度与行为
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 6;8(3):323. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030323.
7
Building great health care teams: enhancing interprofessional work readiness skills, knowledge and values for undergraduate health care students.建设优秀的医疗团队:提高本科医学生的跨专业工作准备技能、知识和价值观。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):272-275. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1686348. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
A culture of caring: the essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration.关爱文化:医疗保健跨专业合作的精髓。
J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):324-331. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
9
Individual-level determinants of interprofessional team collaboration in healthcare.医疗保健中跨专业团队协作的个体层面决定因素。
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):762-767. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1594732. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
10
Italian version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (I-AITCS II): a multiphase study of validity and reliability amongst healthcare providers.《跨专业团队协作评估量表II(意大利语版)》(I-AITCS II):医疗服务提供者有效性和可靠性的多阶段研究
Med Lav. 2018 Aug 28;109(4):316-324. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v109i4.7101.