Sjöblom Linnea, Hantikainen Essi, Dahlgren Anna, Trolle Lagerros Ylva, Bonn Stephanie E
Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Eugeniahemmet T2:02, Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden.
Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, 39100, Italy.
Nutr J. 2025 Jan 4;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01069-2.
mHealth, i.e. mobile-health, strategies may be used as a complement to regular care to support healthy dietary habits in primary care patients. We evaluated the effect of a 12-week smartphone-based dietary education on overall diet quality (primary outcome), and dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers (secondary outcomes) in people with type 2 diabetes.
In this two-armed randomized clinical trial, people with type 2 diabetes were recruited within a primary care setting and randomized 1:1 to a smartphone-delivered dietary education for 12 weeks or a control group receiving regular care only. Dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk markers were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Diet was assessed using a 4-day dietary record and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Overall diet quality was estimated with a Nordic Nutrition Recommendation (NNR) score and specific dietary intake was estimated for 13 food groups/nutrients. We used linear regression models to examine differences in change from baseline to the 3-month follow-up between the intervention and control group, adjusted for baseline values of each outcome variable.
The study included 129 participants (67 in the intervention group and 62 controls), of whom 61% were men. At baseline, mean age was 63.0 years and mean body mass index was 29.8 kg/m. When analyzing dietary record data, we found no effect of the intervention on diet quality or intake, however, the control group had increased their score by 1.6 points (95%CI: -2.9, -0.26) compared to the intervention group. In the analyses of FFQ data, the intervention group had lowered their daily intake in grams of saturated (β = -4.1, 95%CI: -7.9, -0.2) and unsaturated (mono- and polyunsaturated) (β = -6.9, 95%CI: -13.5, -0.4) fat more than the control group. The intervention group also presented lower serum triglycerides levels than the controls (β = -0.33, 95%CI: -0.60, -0.05). No statistical differences were found in any other dietary variables or cardiometabolic risk markers.
While we found no effect on overall diet quality, our findings suggest that a smartphone-based dietary education might impact dietary fat intake and corresponding cardiometabolic risk markers in people with type 2 diabetes. Our results should be considered hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in future studies.
Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03784612 ). Registered 24 December 2018.
移动健康(mHealth)策略,即移动医疗策略,可作为常规护理的补充,以支持初级保健患者养成健康的饮食习惯。我们评估了一项为期12周的基于智能手机的饮食教育对2型糖尿病患者总体饮食质量(主要结局)、饮食摄入量和心血管代谢风险标志物(次要结局)的影响。
在这项双臂随机临床试验中,2型糖尿病患者在初级保健机构中招募,并按1:1随机分为接受为期12周的智能手机饮食教育组或仅接受常规护理的对照组。在基线和3个月后测量饮食摄入量和心血管代谢风险标志物。使用4天饮食记录和食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估饮食。用北欧营养建议(NNR)评分估计总体饮食质量,并估计13个食物组/营养素的特定饮食摄入量。我们使用线性回归模型来检验干预组和对照组从基线到3个月随访的变化差异,并根据每个结局变量的基线值进行调整。
该研究纳入了129名参与者(干预组67名,对照组62名),其中61%为男性。基线时,平均年龄为63.0岁,平均体重指数为29.8kg/m²。在分析饮食记录数据时,我们发现干预对饮食质量或摄入量没有影响,然而,与干预组相比,对照组的得分增加了1.6分(95%CI:-2.9,-0.26)。在FFQ数据分析中,干预组的饱和脂肪(β=-4.1,95%CI:-7.9,-0.2)和不饱和脂肪(单不饱和和多不饱和脂肪)(β=-6.9,95%CI:-13.5,-0.4)每日摄入量下降幅度大于对照组。干预组的血清甘油三酯水平也低于对照组(β=-0.33,95%CI:-0.60,-0.05)。在任何其他饮食变量或心血管代谢风险标志物方面均未发现统计学差异。
虽然我们发现对总体饮食质量没有影响,但我们的研究结果表明,基于智能手机的饮食教育可能会影响2型糖尿病患者的饮食脂肪摄入量和相应的心血管代谢风险标志物。我们的结果应被视为产生假设,需要在未来的研究中得到证实。
在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03784612)。2018年12月24日注册。