Bae Min
Busan University of Foreign Studies, Busan, South Korea.
Med Hist. 2025 Jan;69(1):39-58. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2024.42. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
This article primarily concentrates on the theoretical and intellectual dimensions of nature cure, particularly efforts to revive it during the second half of the nineteenth century. Little is known about specific medical professionals or theories concerning the Victorian philosophy of nature cure, although this philosophy is mentioned in general terms in studies on alternative medicine and hygiene. This article illuminates a Victorian nature cure philosophy through the works of Edward W. Lane (1823-1889). As a physician and hydropathist, Lane aspired to create a new form of medical system, 'hygienic medicine', seeking answers to the questions 'What is disease?' and 'What is medicine?' throughout his career. Lane was among many physicians interested in nature's healing power during his time. However, few undertook as thorough a theorisation of nature cure philosophy as Lane did in the latter half of the nineteenth century, a period that presented unprecedented challenges in reconciling medicine with nature. This study explores the subtle nuances of the concepts that Lane actively used in his theoretical explanations, including 'nature', 'laws of health' and 'vital force', interpreting his efforts as a reconciliation between Romantic naturalism and laboratory medicine. The aim of this study is not to re-evaluate the significance of Lane's medical theory itself. It rather uses Lane as a lens to reveal the intricacies of Victorian nature cure philosophy.
本文主要关注自然疗法的理论和知识层面,特别是19世纪下半叶复兴自然疗法的努力。尽管在替代医学和卫生学研究中曾一般性地提及维多利亚时代的自然疗法理念,但对于具体的医学专业人士或相关理论却知之甚少。本文通过爱德华·W·莱恩(1823 - 1889)的著作来阐释一种维多利亚时代的自然疗法理念。作为一名医生和水疗专家,莱恩毕生致力于创建一种新的医疗体系——“卫生医学”,探寻“疾病是什么?”以及“医学是什么?”这些问题的答案。莱恩是他那个时代众多对自然治愈力感兴趣的医生之一。然而,在19世纪后半叶,很少有人像莱恩那样对自然疗法理念进行如此深入的理论化阐释,这一时期在使医学与自然相协调方面呈现出前所未有的挑战。本研究探讨了莱恩在其理论阐释中积极运用的概念的细微差别,包括“自然”“健康法则”和“生命力”,将他的努力解读为浪漫主义自然主义与实验医学之间的一种调和。本研究的目的并非重新评估莱恩医学理论本身的重要性。而是以莱恩为视角,揭示维多利亚时代自然疗法理念的复杂性。