• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钻井作业中漏失强度特征描述:利用机器学习和测井数据

Lost circulation intensity characterization in drilling operations: Leveraging machine learning and well log data.

作者信息

Azadivash Ahmad

机构信息

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Dec 9;11(1):e41059. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41059. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41059
PMID:39758384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11699355/
Abstract

Lost circulation is one of the important challenges in drilling operations and bears financial losses and operational risks. The prime causes of lost circulation are related to several geological parameters, especially in problem-prone formations. Herein, the approach of applying machine learning models to forecast the intensity of lost circulation using well-log data is presented in this work. It concerns a gas field in northern Iran and contains nine well logs with lost circulation incidents categorized into six intensity classes. After rigorous exploratory analysis and preprocessing of the data, seven machine learning methods are applied: Random Forest, Extra Trees, Decision Tree, XGBoost, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, and Hard Voting. Random Forest, Extra Trees, and Hard Voting are the best-performing methods. These models attained the most robust results on both key performance metrics and, hence, can predict the intensity of lost circulation quite well. Models of Extra Trees and Hard Voting show very high predictive performance values. On the other hand, their limitations in some intensity classes suggest further refinement. In this regard, the ensemble methods are highly effective for managing the multivariate nature of the task. Hard Voting aggregates multiple classifiers, becoming superior to individual models like support vector machines. This paper offers new insight into integrating machine learning to well-log data toward enhancing lost circulation prediction by offering a dependable foundation for real-time drilling decision-making. These results show that the models have the potential to lower operational risks, improve drilling safety, and minimize nonproductive time; hence, they form a quantum leap in lost circulation control.

摘要

漏失是钻井作业中的重要挑战之一,会造成经济损失和作业风险。漏失的主要原因与多个地质参数有关,尤其是在易出现问题的地层中。本文提出了一种利用测井数据应用机器学习模型预测漏失强度的方法。该研究涉及伊朗北部的一个气田,包含9口发生过漏失事件的测井数据,这些漏失事件被分为六个强度等级。在对数据进行严格的探索性分析和预处理之后,应用了七种机器学习方法:随机森林、极端随机树、决策树、XGBoost、k近邻、支持向量机和硬投票。随机森林、极端随机树和硬投票是表现最佳的方法。这些模型在两个关键性能指标上都取得了最稳健的结果,因此能够很好地预测漏失强度。极端随机树和硬投票模型显示出非常高的预测性能值。另一方面,它们在某些强度等级上的局限性表明需要进一步改进。在这方面,集成方法对于处理该任务的多变量性质非常有效。硬投票聚合了多个分类器,比支持向量机等单个模型更具优势。本文通过为实时钻井决策提供可靠基础,为将机器学习与测井数据集成以增强漏失预测提供了新的见解。这些结果表明,这些模型有潜力降低作业风险、提高钻井安全性并最大限度地减少非生产时间;因此,它们在漏失控制方面实现了巨大飞跃。

相似文献

1
Lost circulation intensity characterization in drilling operations: Leveraging machine learning and well log data.钻井作业中漏失强度特征描述:利用机器学习和测井数据
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 9;11(1):e41059. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41059. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation.机器学习方法在钻井作业中循环速率损失建模中的应用
ACS Omega. 2022 Jun 8;7(24):20696-20709. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00970. eCollection 2022 Jun 21.
3
Machine learning model optimization for compressional sonic log prediction using well logs in Shahd SE field, Western Desert, Egypt.利用埃及西部沙漠Shahd SE油田的测井资料对压缩声波测井预测进行机器学习模型优化
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97938-9.
4
[Construction of a machine learning ensemble prediction model for gas chromatographic retention index on stationary phases with different polarities].[基于不同极性固定相的气相色谱保留指数构建机器学习集成预测模型]
Se Pu. 2025 Apr 8;43(4):355-362. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.07014.
5
An ensemble-based machine learning solution for imbalanced multiclass dataset during lithology log generation.一种用于岩性测井生成过程中不平衡多类数据集的基于集成的机器学习解决方案。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):21622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49080-7.
6
Enhancing stroke disease classification through machine learning models via a novel voting system by feature selection techniques.通过特征选择技术的新型投票系统,利用机器学习模型增强中风疾病分类。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0312914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312914. eCollection 2025.
7
Performance of Machine Learning-Based Multi-Model Voting Ensemble Methods for Network Threat Detection in Agriculture 4.0.基于机器学习的多模型投票集成方法在农业 4.0 网络威胁检测中的性能。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 10;21(22):7475. doi: 10.3390/s21227475.
8
Research Progress of High-Temperature Resistant Functional Gel Materials and Their Application in Oil and Gas Drilling.耐高温功能凝胶材料的研究进展及其在油气钻井中的应用
Gels. 2022 Dec 30;9(1):34. doi: 10.3390/gels9010034.
9
Real-Time Prediction of Petrophysical Properties Using Machine Learning Based on Drilling Parameters.基于钻井参数的机器学习岩石物理性质实时预测
ACS Omega. 2024 Apr 8;9(15):17066-17075. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08795. eCollection 2024 Apr 16.
10
Optimizing early diagnosis by integrating multiple classifiers for predicting brain stroke and critical diseases.通过整合多个分类器来优化脑卒中和危急疾病的早期诊断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):28429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80129-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep dive into net pay layers: An in-depth study in Abadan Plain, South Iran.深入探讨净支付层:伊朗南部阿巴丹平原的深入研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 10;9(7):e17204. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17204. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification.马修斯相关系数(MCC)应取代受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC),作为评估二元分类的标准指标。
BioData Min. 2023 Feb 17;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00322-4.
3
Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation.
机器学习方法在钻井作业中循环速率损失建模中的应用
ACS Omega. 2022 Jun 8;7(24):20696-20709. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00970. eCollection 2022 Jun 21.
4
A Comparison of Random Forest Variable Selection Methods for Classification Prediction Modeling.用于分类预测建模的随机森林变量选择方法比较
Expert Syst Appl. 2019 Nov 15;134:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.028. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory and Practice When Evaluating With Dice Score or Jaccard Index.使用骰子分数或杰卡德指数评估时医学图像分割的优化:理论与实践
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Nov;39(11):3679-3690. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3002417. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
A comparison of random forest regression and multiple linear regression for prediction in neuroscience.随机森林回归与多元线性回归在神经科学预测中的比较。
J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Oct 30;220(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.024. Epub 2013 Sep 6.